From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mgamail.intel.com (mgamail.intel.com [192.198.163.7]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 979001B87D5 for ; Wed, 7 May 2025 17:40:28 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=192.198.163.7 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1746639630; cv=none; b=W/v1SCoGuWT+P7EWBiOFrRF8VgDqZtuCMLSWfX5mRxYD+MyVk2hIiduXbRy1NGt6Uk2/Tl+FkaQRaziL+iVmApT2F9Q6iistYim/h7S5yCJFh6HvBichuHZqxIdnfgU5lAelzeEUgUK4u7cODJmkoyUZztLexpM7BtAkUSxS/CE= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1746639630; c=relaxed/simple; bh=XEU3JtVP0JCqEl1+ZIKdtCUKhyrQ/nzLh/xf7m7tLw0=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:MIME-Version:Content-Type: Content-Disposition; b=QhI0HVkV9e9lWMb/0nbkeBVkQE0QZcZK6l5kvyBIzQxIQkH/yHa9ZH+DVkf/TKU0+Fsg73RqVRtW1bCSOPFmkMtshsDejo7Hx524XTsMfnuMKYSbArFrZmtoR3x6wxFef8l3Z/pmarLZJpz2p72VDoCykuwzP9/YnIWmVkLVWJU= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=intel.com; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=intel.com; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=intel.com header.i=@intel.com header.b=jOKEeooJ; arc=none smtp.client-ip=192.198.163.7 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=intel.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=intel.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=intel.com header.i=@intel.com header.b="jOKEeooJ" DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=intel.com; i=@intel.com; q=dns/txt; s=Intel; t=1746639629; x=1778175629; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:mime-version; bh=XEU3JtVP0JCqEl1+ZIKdtCUKhyrQ/nzLh/xf7m7tLw0=; b=jOKEeooJGy5Yc57rrNAgaU1uBLJbUlZNtaMe0lzBrSGqOLCwkW1QP4Ho fZXgZ3U51XSGmhp4Hdt6zMMlWUBAbpyf5Fm4+YWPRL4/jPPxmLO9TSIdj NcBi0SqQnKkIk5/zYpLzPDOPZiF2ZLuDdhc0QQejVYGkrh+GVjzpHUYjH aIooeCKGaDrg9Y6A+62KF8PtGZTwZhCdX8eGLSADNbuavBamu7HRYI8JU eJd7JrU9xsj76qu/hbBiyR/4h17nI4OKzyllFsqzrvRirWZ4jlODbAg1o Yx+3rijSZtM1qXuQC39BzR+vst5I0brWC9fMWUV6lurNXlmjDA4OcrFUR A==; X-CSE-ConnectionGUID: r0MH7CsQT6S2KpkeTLzlwQ== X-CSE-MsgGUID: UdDqjsYmSRufzxJxehFrIQ== X-IronPort-AV: E=McAfee;i="6700,10204,11426"; a="73775041" X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="6.15,270,1739865600"; d="scan'208";a="73775041" Received: from orviesa003.jf.intel.com ([10.64.159.143]) by fmvoesa101.fm.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 07 May 2025 10:40:28 -0700 X-CSE-ConnectionGUID: vx4XmfbZQGatlWtX9JUseA== X-CSE-MsgGUID: dFNSfwh7S9S4YJGnl3pqQQ== X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="6.15,270,1739865600"; d="scan'208";a="140779312" Received: from lkp-server01.sh.intel.com (HELO 1992f890471c) ([10.239.97.150]) by orviesa003.jf.intel.com with ESMTP; 07 May 2025 10:40:26 -0700 Received: from kbuild by 1992f890471c with local (Exim 4.96) (envelope-from ) id 1uCikq-0008Ex-1r; Wed, 07 May 2025 17:40:24 +0000 Date: Thu, 8 May 2025 01:39:39 +0800 From: kernel test robot To: oe-kbuild@lists.linux.dev Cc: lkp@intel.com Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 2/2] arm64: dts: rockchip: Add rk3399-evb-ind board Message-ID: <202505080106.d5ZOICtU-lkp@intel.com> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: oe-kbuild@lists.linux.dev List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline :::::: :::::: Manual check reason: "dtcheck: binding changes may go via different trees" :::::: BCC: lkp@intel.com CC: oe-kbuild-all@lists.linux.dev In-Reply-To: <20250506034347.57-3-kernel@airkyi.com> References: <20250506034347.57-3-kernel@airkyi.com> TO: Chaoyi Chen TO: Heiko Stuebner CC: Andrew Lunn CC: Rob Herring CC: Krzysztof Kozlowski CC: Conor Dooley CC: Jonas Karlman CC: Kever Yang CC: Jianfeng Liu CC: Dragan Simic CC: Jimmy Hon CC: Quentin Schulz CC: FUKAUMI Naoki CC: Cristian Ciocaltea CC: Alexey Charkov CC: Geert Uytterhoeven CC: Sebastian Reichel CC: Chaoyi Chen CC: devicetree@vger.kernel.org CC: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org CC: linux-rockchip@lists.infradead.org CC: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Hi Chaoyi, kernel test robot noticed the following build warnings: [auto build test WARNING on rockchip/for-next] [also build test WARNING on robh/for-next linus/master v6.15-rc5 next-20250507] [If your patch is applied to the wrong git tree, kindly drop us a note. And when submitting patch, we suggest to use '--base' as documented in https://git-scm.com/docs/git-format-patch#_base_tree_information] url: https://github.com/intel-lab-lkp/linux/commits/Chaoyi-Chen/dt-bindings-arm-rockchip-Add-rk3399-industry-evaluation-board/20250506-151352 base: https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/mmind/linux-rockchip.git for-next patch link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20250506034347.57-3-kernel%40airkyi.com patch subject: [PATCH v3 2/2] arm64: dts: rockchip: Add rk3399-evb-ind board :::::: branch date: 34 hours ago :::::: commit date: 34 hours ago config: arm64-randconfig-052-20250507 (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20250508/202505080106.d5ZOICtU-lkp@intel.com/config) compiler: aarch64-linux-gcc (GCC) 8.5.0 dtschema version: 2025.3.dev21+ge6ea659 reproduce (this is a W=1 build): (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20250508/202505080106.d5ZOICtU-lkp@intel.com/reproduce) If you fix the issue in a separate patch/commit (i.e. not just a new version of the same patch/commit), kindly add following tags | Reported-by: kernel test robot | Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/r/202505080106.d5ZOICtU-lkp@intel.com/ dtcheck warnings: (new ones prefixed by >>) arch/arm64/boot/dts/rockchip/rk3399-base.dtsi:530.26-564.4: Warning (unit_address_vs_reg): /usb@fe800000: node has a unit name, but no reg or ranges property arch/arm64/boot/dts/rockchip/rk3399-base.dtsi:566.26-600.4: Warning (unit_address_vs_reg): /usb@fe900000: node has a unit name, but no reg or ranges property arch/arm64/boot/dts/rockchip/rk3399-base.dtsi:2063.25-2102.4: Warning (avoid_unnecessary_addr_size): /dsi@ff960000: unnecessary #address-cells/#size-cells without "ranges", "dma-ranges" or child "reg" property arch/arm64/boot/dts/rockchip/rk3399-base.dtsi:2104.26-2144.4: Warning (avoid_unnecessary_addr_size): /dsi@ff968000: unnecessary #address-cells/#size-cells without "ranges", "dma-ranges" or child "reg" property arch/arm64/boot/dts/rockchip/rk3399-evb-ind.dtb: /dp@fec00000: failed to match any schema with compatible: ['rockchip,rk3399-cdn-dp'] >> arch/arm64/boot/dts/rockchip/rk3399-evb-ind.dtb: regulator@10 (tcs,tcs4525): Unevaluated properties are not allowed ('regulator-compatible' was unexpected) from schema $id: http://devicetree.org/schemas/regulator/fcs,fan53555.yaml# >> arch/arm64/boot/dts/rockchip/rk3399-evb-ind.dtb: regulator@1c (tcs,tcs4525): Unevaluated properties are not allowed ('regulator-compatible' was unexpected) from schema $id: http://devicetree.org/schemas/regulator/fcs,fan53555.yaml# arch/arm64/boot/dts/rockchip/rk3399-evb-ind.dtb: /syscon@ff770000/pcie-phy: failed to match any schema with compatible: ['rockchip,rk3399-pcie-phy'] arch/arm64/boot/dts/rockchip/rk3399-evb-ind.dtb: /phy@ff7c0000: failed to match any schema with compatible: ['rockchip,rk3399-typec-phy'] arch/arm64/boot/dts/rockchip/rk3399-evb-ind.dtb: /phy@ff800000: failed to match any schema with compatible: ['rockchip,rk3399-typec-phy'] -- 0-DAY CI Kernel Test Service https://github.com/intel/lkp-tests/wiki