From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mgamail.intel.com (mgamail.intel.com [198.175.65.17]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 623EC1990A7 for ; Thu, 8 May 2025 18:27:32 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=198.175.65.17 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1746728854; cv=none; b=Y1gS+GVrCEfBk3clMtp5IAlqmm+XWJwCNodoOigVjz0SGKSWKGHI60EVorcrrM26hFOMji5kCVr3JpC7i7g1EJOoUb278e2m8JkSmKtgPbraEgwpfOmGQFA0MxfgFLBtfmvu4mKIFv70x32p+WWkG+tqgaknx55n6FgLGmNEdkM= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1746728854; c=relaxed/simple; bh=z+OH4Hix1u1hTfBauNd2rQQ9rkL4HlW6Io1I+ZdMeaI=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:MIME-Version:Content-Type: Content-Disposition; b=i7SYwz7/aQbmdDPM3bQOCnN6Nno6Hrhk68mVCQlZw9N6R+ppxTWQw/t/nWgsUX2Ys3DB5UGB29NIgTLICfgPLpzaoK+HHxi8bSFc2f5NBjq3UcF8ad0/kLXQEv1oITrJ9wqnZLNlwRFbw1rY2WDJFvg52wsnsT1u6s/v1TQUWMU= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=intel.com; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=intel.com; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=intel.com header.i=@intel.com header.b=cTPYUmXU; arc=none smtp.client-ip=198.175.65.17 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=intel.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=intel.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=intel.com header.i=@intel.com header.b="cTPYUmXU" DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=intel.com; i=@intel.com; q=dns/txt; s=Intel; t=1746728853; x=1778264853; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:mime-version; bh=z+OH4Hix1u1hTfBauNd2rQQ9rkL4HlW6Io1I+ZdMeaI=; b=cTPYUmXU/ExDpy1yQRP+PtKop2jRCajyUW5IE3EdtZBUSv/cEEp4OxSj e2G+ZxH4mrnm/ZokI1g+dUQUUE5ZC5syi9hSqPXUaMRgHPNqIBpCvwXbN as7lP3qlB3teHQuZ9MnGDnOqmCYWzuWFUCOhTToYbUZHQDqWu2G7gxR+O 4t8HSABOQVzUZYhGHikWmCLsMCEUQnX5psXVGKt3XLbeLbSWS07qvhMqG enfH/c9hRfPf2oTTkkXxgnWeHceFEw0jt+qIf9d4iEBhsloMXuaCBIS9e if/o4r5pKCzCW5CvXVISVc4DWnOFXk+pd739nEBaH2tMFaKo1cF8Mr5jF w==; X-CSE-ConnectionGUID: Kj4t/qOXSA61PC0jjIyQkw== X-CSE-MsgGUID: b8Q+M1jOTFepHjkib54fJw== X-IronPort-AV: E=McAfee;i="6700,10204,11427"; a="48544220" X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="6.15,272,1739865600"; d="scan'208";a="48544220" Received: from fmviesa004.fm.intel.com ([10.60.135.144]) by orvoesa109.jf.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 08 May 2025 11:27:32 -0700 X-CSE-ConnectionGUID: 2aRM4qelRXWfHtuPTDuT7A== X-CSE-MsgGUID: FBdZama9Tp630ciDV6F3Aw== X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="6.15,272,1739865600"; d="scan'208";a="141580936" Received: from lkp-server01.sh.intel.com (HELO 1992f890471c) ([10.239.97.150]) by fmviesa004.fm.intel.com with ESMTP; 08 May 2025 11:27:30 -0700 Received: from kbuild by 1992f890471c with local (Exim 4.96) (envelope-from ) id 1uD5xw-000BFl-16; Thu, 08 May 2025 18:27:28 +0000 Date: Fri, 9 May 2025 02:26:33 +0800 From: kernel test robot To: jason.zeng@intel.com, lin.x.wang@intel.com, pei.p.jia@intel.com Cc: oe-kbuild-all@lists.linux.dev Subject: [bytedance:5.15-velinux 0/350] mm/oom_kill.c:318:14: warning: no previous prototype for 'bpf_oom_evaluate_task' Message-ID: <202505090238.fChHRDLp-lkp@intel.com> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: oe-kbuild-all@lists.linux.dev List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Hi Chuyi, FYI, the error/warning still remains. tree: https://github.com/bytedance/kernel.git 5.15-velinux head: de277dab626c9ece4c9cf99ec9c56f23b298a042 commit: 9cffac2e6f2df386d7cf4c2cf90d5fe2c1d6b793 [0/350] bytedance: mm, oom: Introduce bpf_oom_evaluate_task config: arm64-allnoconfig (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20250509/202505090238.fChHRDLp-lkp@intel.com/config) compiler: aarch64-linux-gcc (GCC) 14.2.0 reproduce (this is a W=1 build): (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20250509/202505090238.fChHRDLp-lkp@intel.com/reproduce) If you fix the issue in a separate patch/commit (i.e. not just a new version of the same patch/commit), kindly add following tags | Reported-by: kernel test robot | Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/oe-kbuild-all/202505090238.fChHRDLp-lkp@intel.com/ All warnings (new ones prefixed by >>): >> mm/oom_kill.c:318:14: warning: no previous prototype for 'bpf_oom_evaluate_task' [-Wmissing-prototypes] 318 | noinline int bpf_oom_evaluate_task(struct task_struct *task, struct oom_control *oc) | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ vim +/bpf_oom_evaluate_task +318 mm/oom_kill.c 317 > 318 noinline int bpf_oom_evaluate_task(struct task_struct *task, struct oom_control *oc) 319 { 320 return NO_BPF_POLICY; 321 } 322 ALLOW_ERROR_INJECTION(bpf_oom_evaluate_task, ERRNO); 323 -- 0-DAY CI Kernel Test Service https://github.com/intel/lkp-tests/wiki