From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from zeniv.linux.org.uk (zeniv.linux.org.uk [62.89.141.173]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5391318DF8D; Fri, 9 May 2025 16:11:14 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=62.89.141.173 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1746807078; cv=none; b=eO0k0q0EN+imxHuxVwUz89VyCx2+e1oBQQF5TJuDdFP/nGKKhQJoDlJJqz25IodmskiiyAkIkmtMP4BXw3WIuwNW5IwfrusY3tt+VcT+2UVNdqHGRpDN8BBkjgez/jH3OFZKxqkjFVpwXN4h9bs8Bdy42OON3j7e5dMUeAGv//8= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1746807078; c=relaxed/simple; bh=DkVPEwXq5LEd8phpizlGw24qYJuQeTZBQGQZxBGSslk=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:References:MIME-Version: Content-Type:Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To; b=cS3Y3D0Su6+wiohQQUQ9DtZp/V0oZUWR7FzgwyBVq31yqog5vrKkbxH9nthbZPPLei5+Vu7pK5kgb8hiTPgdXR6spoprKKaViiz45oBSVpbF1k9AirirvVaLWi0uPBGmdvKWrmJQ0RWIzMg13DeYLrzytMPVDsCgsyCLjjJF+ow= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=zeniv.linux.org.uk; spf=none smtp.mailfrom=ftp.linux.org.uk; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=linux.org.uk header.i=@linux.org.uk header.b=IYbqFhNL; arc=none smtp.client-ip=62.89.141.173 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=zeniv.linux.org.uk Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=none smtp.mailfrom=ftp.linux.org.uk Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=linux.org.uk header.i=@linux.org.uk header.b="IYbqFhNL" DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=linux.org.uk; s=zeniv-20220401; h=Sender:In-Reply-To:Content-Type: MIME-Version:References:Message-ID:Subject:Cc:To:From:Date:Reply-To: Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-ID:Content-Description; bh=Ru3Psh63tMF04aB59rcC/KiAWCC4Jih9Q0TM6aAwHQk=; b=IYbqFhNLlzZpJDoUGW4j7XFGr3 xYI3V6qewxfbX3/u4MmjmUmyzOJJSVza1ks8Ztd1EeYhHHY/F6VTl+OeM0ZfzY4TQN8+fZsa+fdYc IdXqdg3EEuoYURxD0jFITqcwTre1FwdnVq1GOochNthnq1eZbby8Jv+zhXxuCNIV/3wi/HNkyRvs2 dJKaQCa/cKaZVqvS70ZzABIDsYJjVhDEpEFm/g2ocf++zV5KyNbefaygRDTr9Y/XNkqKtmikaQZ3H vA60S64LSDCvXYqjCIRVzZ1xpW8IgDX9gVF2MlxdPVH/xUv+v/0KejMQULYLXZsJ+eEwt9skN+6T1 fGMjvmmg==; Received: from viro by zeniv.linux.org.uk with local (Exim 4.98.2 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1uDQJc-0000000ClvS-3a4Y; Fri, 09 May 2025 16:11:13 +0000 Date: Fri, 9 May 2025 17:11:12 +0100 From: Al Viro To: kernel test robot Cc: oe-kbuild-all@lists.linux.dev, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [viro-vfs:untested.securityfs 6/8] security/integrity/ima/ima_fs.c:524:27: error: 'ima_policy' undeclared; did you mean 'vma_policy'? Message-ID: <20250509161112.GW2023217@ZenIV> References: <202505092310.0UXOhVZP-lkp@intel.com> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: oe-kbuild-all@lists.linux.dev List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <202505092310.0UXOhVZP-lkp@intel.com> Sender: Al Viro On Fri, May 09, 2025 at 11:47:36PM +0800, kernel test robot wrote: > tree: https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/viro/vfs.git untested.securityfs > head: b0b8e25f92ec20e266859de5f823b4e39b8e2f9d > commit: 08433f2507554980bc891d8b17c1968c81cb144b [6/8] ima_fs: don't bother with removal of files in directory we'll be removing > config: i386-buildonly-randconfig-006-20250509 (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20250509/202505092310.0UXOhVZP-lkp@intel.com/config) > compiler: gcc-11 (Debian 11.3.0-12) 11.3.0 > reproduce (this is a W=1 build): (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20250509/202505092310.0UXOhVZP-lkp@intel.com/reproduce) > > If you fix the issue in a separate patch/commit (i.e. not just a new version of > the same patch/commit), kindly add following tags > | Reported-by: kernel test robot > | Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/oe-kbuild-all/202505092310.0UXOhVZP-lkp@intel.com/ > > All errors (new ones prefixed by >>): > > security/integrity/ima/ima_fs.c: In function 'ima_release_policy': > >> security/integrity/ima/ima_fs.c:524:27: error: 'ima_policy' undeclared (first use in this function); did you mean 'vma_policy'? > 524 | securityfs_remove(ima_policy); > | ^~~~~~~~~~ > | vma_policy > security/integrity/ima/ima_fs.c:524:27: note: each undeclared identifier is reported only once for each function it appears in Yeah, that line also needs to be removed - it's handled by securityfs_remove(ima_dir); a few lines later.