All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Tiffany Y. Yang" <ynaffit@google.com>
To: "Greg Kroah-Hartman" <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
	"Arve Hjønnevåg" <arve@android.com>,
	"Todd Kjos" <tkjos@android.com>,
	"Martijn Coenen" <maco@android.com>,
	"Joel Fernandes" <joel@joelfernandes.org>,
	"Christian Brauner" <brauner@kernel.org>,
	"Carlos Llamas" <cmllamas@google.com>,
	"Suren Baghdasaryan" <surenb@google.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, kernel-team@android.com
Subject: [PATCH v4 1/2] binder: Refactor binder_node print synchronization
Date: Sat, 10 May 2025 01:34:38 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20250510013435.1520671-5-ynaffit@google.com> (raw)

The binder driver outputs information about each dead binder node by
iterating over the dead nodes list, and it prints the state of each live
node in the system by traversing each binder_proc's proc->nodes tree.
Both cases require similar logic to maintain the global lock ordering
while accessing each node.

Create a helper function to synchronize around printing binder nodes in
a list. Opportunistically make minor cosmetic changes to binder print
functions.

Acked-by: Carlos Llamas <cmllamas@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Tiffany Y. Yang <ynaffit@google.com>
---
v2:
* Updated print_next_binder_node_ilocked function comment to reflect
  dropped locks
* Added acked-by tag
v4:
* Specify binder_proc to re-lock on instead of using node->proc to avoid
  error from race with binder_node_release that Alice pointed out

---
 drivers/android/binder.c | 119 ++++++++++++++++++++++-----------------
 1 file changed, 68 insertions(+), 51 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/android/binder.c b/drivers/android/binder.c
index 5fc2c8ee61b1..8e4912643749 100644
--- a/drivers/android/binder.c
+++ b/drivers/android/binder.c
@@ -6377,10 +6377,10 @@ static void print_binder_transaction_ilocked(struct seq_file *m,
 }
 
 static void print_binder_work_ilocked(struct seq_file *m,
-				     struct binder_proc *proc,
-				     const char *prefix,
-				     const char *transaction_prefix,
-				     struct binder_work *w)
+				      struct binder_proc *proc,
+				      const char *prefix,
+				      const char *transaction_prefix,
+				      struct binder_work *w)
 {
 	struct binder_node *node;
 	struct binder_transaction *t;
@@ -6430,7 +6430,7 @@ static void print_binder_work_ilocked(struct seq_file *m,
 
 static void print_binder_thread_ilocked(struct seq_file *m,
 					struct binder_thread *thread,
-					int print_always)
+					bool print_always)
 {
 	struct binder_transaction *t;
 	struct binder_work *w;
@@ -6505,8 +6505,53 @@ static void print_binder_ref_olocked(struct seq_file *m,
 	binder_node_unlock(ref->node);
 }
 
-static void print_binder_proc(struct seq_file *m,
-			      struct binder_proc *proc, int print_all)
+/**
+ * print_next_binder_node_ilocked() - Print binder_node from a locked list
+ * @m:          struct seq_file for output via seq_printf()
+ * @proc:       struct binder_proc we hold the inner_proc_lock to (if any)
+ * @node:       struct binder_node to print fields of
+ * @prev_node:	struct binder_node we hold a temporary reference to (if any)
+ *
+ * Helper function to handle synchronization around printing a struct
+ * binder_node while iterating through @proc->nodes or the dead nodes list.
+ * Caller must hold either @proc->inner_lock (for live nodes) or
+ * binder_dead_nodes_lock. This lock will be released during the body of this
+ * function, but it will be reacquired before returning to the caller.
+ *
+ * Return:	pointer to the struct binder_node we hold a tmpref on
+ */
+static struct binder_node *
+print_next_binder_node_ilocked(struct seq_file *m, struct binder_proc *proc,
+			       struct binder_node *node,
+			       struct binder_node *prev_node)
+{
+	/*
+	 * Take a temporary reference on the node so that isn't freed while
+	 * we print it.
+	 */
+	binder_inc_node_tmpref_ilocked(node);
+	/*
+	 * Live nodes need to drop the inner proc lock and dead nodes need to
+	 * drop the binder_dead_nodes_lock before trying to take the node lock.
+	 */
+	if (proc)
+		binder_inner_proc_unlock(proc);
+	else
+		spin_unlock(&binder_dead_nodes_lock);
+	if (prev_node)
+		binder_put_node(prev_node);
+	binder_node_inner_lock(node);
+	print_binder_node_nilocked(m, node);
+	binder_node_inner_unlock(node);
+	if (proc)
+		binder_inner_proc_lock(proc);
+	else
+		spin_lock(&binder_dead_nodes_lock);
+	return node;
+}
+
+static void print_binder_proc(struct seq_file *m, struct binder_proc *proc,
+			      bool print_all)
 {
 	struct binder_work *w;
 	struct rb_node *n;
@@ -6519,31 +6564,18 @@ static void print_binder_proc(struct seq_file *m,
 	header_pos = m->count;
 
 	binder_inner_proc_lock(proc);
-	for (n = rb_first(&proc->threads); n != NULL; n = rb_next(n))
+	for (n = rb_first(&proc->threads); n; n = rb_next(n))
 		print_binder_thread_ilocked(m, rb_entry(n, struct binder_thread,
 						rb_node), print_all);
 
-	for (n = rb_first(&proc->nodes); n != NULL; n = rb_next(n)) {
+	for (n = rb_first(&proc->nodes); n; n = rb_next(n)) {
 		struct binder_node *node = rb_entry(n, struct binder_node,
 						    rb_node);
 		if (!print_all && !node->has_async_transaction)
 			continue;
 
-		/*
-		 * take a temporary reference on the node so it
-		 * survives and isn't removed from the tree
-		 * while we print it.
-		 */
-		binder_inc_node_tmpref_ilocked(node);
-		/* Need to drop inner lock to take node lock */
-		binder_inner_proc_unlock(proc);
-		if (last_node)
-			binder_put_node(last_node);
-		binder_node_inner_lock(node);
-		print_binder_node_nilocked(m, node);
-		binder_node_inner_unlock(node);
-		last_node = node;
-		binder_inner_proc_lock(proc);
+		last_node = print_next_binder_node_ilocked(m, proc, node,
+							   last_node);
 	}
 	binder_inner_proc_unlock(proc);
 	if (last_node)
@@ -6551,12 +6583,10 @@ static void print_binder_proc(struct seq_file *m,
 
 	if (print_all) {
 		binder_proc_lock(proc);
-		for (n = rb_first(&proc->refs_by_desc);
-		     n != NULL;
-		     n = rb_next(n))
+		for (n = rb_first(&proc->refs_by_desc); n; n = rb_next(n))
 			print_binder_ref_olocked(m, rb_entry(n,
-							    struct binder_ref,
-							    rb_node_desc));
+							     struct binder_ref,
+							     rb_node_desc));
 		binder_proc_unlock(proc);
 	}
 	binder_alloc_print_allocated(m, &proc->alloc);
@@ -6696,7 +6726,7 @@ static void print_binder_proc_stats(struct seq_file *m,
 	count = 0;
 	ready_threads = 0;
 	binder_inner_proc_lock(proc);
-	for (n = rb_first(&proc->threads); n != NULL; n = rb_next(n))
+	for (n = rb_first(&proc->threads); n; n = rb_next(n))
 		count++;
 
 	list_for_each_entry(thread, &proc->waiting_threads, waiting_thread_node)
@@ -6710,7 +6740,7 @@ static void print_binder_proc_stats(struct seq_file *m,
 			ready_threads,
 			free_async_space);
 	count = 0;
-	for (n = rb_first(&proc->nodes); n != NULL; n = rb_next(n))
+	for (n = rb_first(&proc->nodes); n; n = rb_next(n))
 		count++;
 	binder_inner_proc_unlock(proc);
 	seq_printf(m, "  nodes: %d\n", count);
@@ -6718,7 +6748,7 @@ static void print_binder_proc_stats(struct seq_file *m,
 	strong = 0;
 	weak = 0;
 	binder_proc_lock(proc);
-	for (n = rb_first(&proc->refs_by_desc); n != NULL; n = rb_next(n)) {
+	for (n = rb_first(&proc->refs_by_desc); n; n = rb_next(n)) {
 		struct binder_ref *ref = rb_entry(n, struct binder_ref,
 						  rb_node_desc);
 		count++;
@@ -6756,29 +6786,16 @@ static int state_show(struct seq_file *m, void *unused)
 	spin_lock(&binder_dead_nodes_lock);
 	if (!hlist_empty(&binder_dead_nodes))
 		seq_puts(m, "dead nodes:\n");
-	hlist_for_each_entry(node, &binder_dead_nodes, dead_node) {
-		/*
-		 * take a temporary reference on the node so it
-		 * survives and isn't removed from the list
-		 * while we print it.
-		 */
-		node->tmp_refs++;
-		spin_unlock(&binder_dead_nodes_lock);
-		if (last_node)
-			binder_put_node(last_node);
-		binder_node_lock(node);
-		print_binder_node_nilocked(m, node);
-		binder_node_unlock(node);
-		last_node = node;
-		spin_lock(&binder_dead_nodes_lock);
-	}
+	hlist_for_each_entry(node, &binder_dead_nodes, dead_node)
+		last_node = print_next_binder_node_ilocked(m, NULL, node,
+							   last_node);
 	spin_unlock(&binder_dead_nodes_lock);
 	if (last_node)
 		binder_put_node(last_node);
 
 	mutex_lock(&binder_procs_lock);
 	hlist_for_each_entry(proc, &binder_procs, proc_node)
-		print_binder_proc(m, proc, 1);
+		print_binder_proc(m, proc, true);
 	mutex_unlock(&binder_procs_lock);
 
 	return 0;
@@ -6807,7 +6824,7 @@ static int transactions_show(struct seq_file *m, void *unused)
 	seq_puts(m, "binder transactions:\n");
 	mutex_lock(&binder_procs_lock);
 	hlist_for_each_entry(proc, &binder_procs, proc_node)
-		print_binder_proc(m, proc, 0);
+		print_binder_proc(m, proc, false);
 	mutex_unlock(&binder_procs_lock);
 
 	return 0;
@@ -6822,7 +6839,7 @@ static int proc_show(struct seq_file *m, void *unused)
 	hlist_for_each_entry(itr, &binder_procs, proc_node) {
 		if (itr->pid == pid) {
 			seq_puts(m, "binder proc state:\n");
-			print_binder_proc(m, itr, 1);
+			print_binder_proc(m, itr, true);
 		}
 	}
 	mutex_unlock(&binder_procs_lock);
-- 
2.49.0.1045.g170613ef41-goog


             reply	other threads:[~2025-05-10  1:35 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2025-05-10  1:34 Tiffany Y. Yang [this message]
2025-05-10  1:34 ` [PATCH v4 2/2] binder: Create safe versions of binder log files Tiffany Y. Yang
2025-05-19 17:47 ` [PATCH v4 1/2] binder: Refactor binder_node print synchronization Alice Ryhl

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20250510013435.1520671-5-ynaffit@google.com \
    --to=ynaffit@google.com \
    --cc=arve@android.com \
    --cc=brauner@kernel.org \
    --cc=cmllamas@google.com \
    --cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
    --cc=joel@joelfernandes.org \
    --cc=kernel-team@android.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=maco@android.com \
    --cc=surenb@google.com \
    --cc=tkjos@android.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.