[PATCH] xfs: remove some EXPERIMENTAL warnings

["Darrick J. Wong" <djwong@kernel.org>]

From: Darrick J. Wong <djwong@kernel.org>

Online fsck was finished a year ago, in Linux 6.10.  The exchange-range
syscall and parent pointers were merged in the same cycle.  None of
these have encountered any serious errors in the year that they've been
in the kernel (or the many many years they've been under development) so
let's drop the shouty warnings.

Signed-off-by: "Darrick J. Wong" <djwong@kernel.org>
---
 fs/xfs/xfs_message.h |    3 ---
 fs/xfs/scrub/scrub.c |    2 --
 fs/xfs/xfs_message.c |   12 ------------
 fs/xfs/xfs_super.c   |    7 -------
 4 files changed, 24 deletions(-)

diff --git a/fs/xfs/xfs_message.h b/fs/xfs/xfs_message.h
index a92a4d09c8e9fa..bce9942f394a6f 100644
--- a/fs/xfs/xfs_message.h
+++ b/fs/xfs/xfs_message.h
@@ -92,12 +92,9 @@ void xfs_buf_alert_ratelimited(struct xfs_buf *bp, const char *rlmsg,
 
 enum xfs_experimental_feat {
 	XFS_EXPERIMENTAL_PNFS,
-	XFS_EXPERIMENTAL_SCRUB,
 	XFS_EXPERIMENTAL_SHRINK,
 	XFS_EXPERIMENTAL_LARP,
 	XFS_EXPERIMENTAL_LBS,
-	XFS_EXPERIMENTAL_EXCHRANGE,
-	XFS_EXPERIMENTAL_PPTR,
 	XFS_EXPERIMENTAL_METADIR,
 	XFS_EXPERIMENTAL_ZONED,
 
diff --git a/fs/xfs/scrub/scrub.c b/fs/xfs/scrub/scrub.c
index 9908850bf76f9e..76e24032e99a53 100644
--- a/fs/xfs/scrub/scrub.c
+++ b/fs/xfs/scrub/scrub.c
@@ -680,8 +680,6 @@ xfs_scrub_metadata(
 	if (error)
 		goto out;
 
-	xfs_warn_experimental(mp, XFS_EXPERIMENTAL_SCRUB);
-
 	sc = kzalloc(sizeof(struct xfs_scrub), XCHK_GFP_FLAGS);
 	if (!sc) {
 		error = -ENOMEM;
diff --git a/fs/xfs/xfs_message.c b/fs/xfs/xfs_message.c
index 15d410d16bb27c..54fc5ada519c43 100644
--- a/fs/xfs/xfs_message.c
+++ b/fs/xfs/xfs_message.c
@@ -145,10 +145,6 @@ xfs_warn_experimental(
 			.opstate	= XFS_OPSTATE_WARNED_PNFS,
 			.name		= "pNFS",
 		},
-		[XFS_EXPERIMENTAL_SCRUB] = {
-			.opstate	= XFS_OPSTATE_WARNED_SCRUB,
-			.name		= "online scrub",
-		},
 		[XFS_EXPERIMENTAL_SHRINK] = {
 			.opstate	= XFS_OPSTATE_WARNED_SHRINK,
 			.name		= "online shrink",
@@ -161,14 +157,6 @@ xfs_warn_experimental(
 			.opstate	= XFS_OPSTATE_WARNED_LBS,
 			.name		= "large block size",
 		},
-		[XFS_EXPERIMENTAL_EXCHRANGE] = {
-			.opstate	= XFS_OPSTATE_WARNED_EXCHRANGE,
-			.name		= "exchange range",
-		},
-		[XFS_EXPERIMENTAL_PPTR] = {
-			.opstate	= XFS_OPSTATE_WARNED_PPTR,
-			.name		= "parent pointer",
-		},
 		[XFS_EXPERIMENTAL_METADIR] = {
 			.opstate	= XFS_OPSTATE_WARNED_METADIR,
 			.name		= "metadata directory tree",
diff --git a/fs/xfs/xfs_super.c b/fs/xfs/xfs_super.c
index 696874e72eacf1..b4e830fe101b2f 100644
--- a/fs/xfs/xfs_super.c
+++ b/fs/xfs/xfs_super.c
@@ -1953,13 +1953,6 @@ xfs_fs_fill_super(
 		}
 	}
 
-
-	if (xfs_has_exchange_range(mp))
-		xfs_warn_experimental(mp, XFS_EXPERIMENTAL_EXCHRANGE);
-
-	if (xfs_has_parent(mp))
-		xfs_warn_experimental(mp, XFS_EXPERIMENTAL_PPTR);
-
 	/*
 	 * If no quota mount options were provided, maybe we'll try to pick
 	 * up the quota accounting and enforcement flags from the ondisk sb.