From: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
To: mm-commits@vger.kernel.org,vbabka@suse.cz,tglx@linutronix.de,surenb@google.com,stable@vger.kernel.org,mhocko@suse.com,jackmanb@google.com,hannes@cmpxchg.org,bp@alien8.de,kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com,akpm@linux-foundation.org
Subject: [merged mm-hotfixes-stable] mm-page_alloc-fix-race-condition-in-unaccepted-memory-handling.patch removed from -mm tree
Date: Sun, 11 May 2025 17:26:57 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20250512002657.B2AB4C4CEEF@smtp.kernel.org> (raw)
The quilt patch titled
Subject: mm/page_alloc: fix race condition in unaccepted memory handling
has been removed from the -mm tree. Its filename was
mm-page_alloc-fix-race-condition-in-unaccepted-memory-handling.patch
This patch was dropped because it was merged into the mm-hotfixes-stable branch
of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/akpm/mm
------------------------------------------------------
From: "Kirill A. Shutemov" <kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com>
Subject: mm/page_alloc: fix race condition in unaccepted memory handling
Date: Tue, 6 May 2025 16:32:07 +0300
The page allocator tracks the number of zones that have unaccepted memory
using static_branch_enc/dec() and uses that static branch in hot paths to
determine if it needs to deal with unaccepted memory.
Borislav and Thomas pointed out that the tracking is racy: operations on
static_branch are not serialized against adding/removing unaccepted pages
to/from the zone.
Sanity checks inside static_branch machinery detects it:
WARNING: CPU: 0 PID: 10 at kernel/jump_label.c:276 __static_key_slow_dec_cpuslocked+0x8e/0xa0
The comment around the WARN() explains the problem:
/*
* Warn about the '-1' case though; since that means a
* decrement is concurrent with a first (0->1) increment. IOW
* people are trying to disable something that wasn't yet fully
* enabled. This suggests an ordering problem on the user side.
*/
The effect of this static_branch optimization is only visible on
microbenchmark.
Instead of adding more complexity around it, remove it altogether.
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20250506133207.1009676-1-kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com
Signed-off-by: Kirill A. Shutemov <kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com>
Fixes: dcdfdd40fa82 ("mm: Add support for unaccepted memory")
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/all/20250506092445.GBaBnVXXyvnazly6iF@fat_crate.local
Reported-by: Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>
Tested-by: Borislav Petkov (AMD) <bp@alien8.de>
Reported-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Cc: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz>
Cc: Suren Baghdasaryan <surenb@google.com>
Cc: Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com>
Cc: Brendan Jackman <jackmanb@google.com>
Cc: Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org>
Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org> [6.5+]
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
---
mm/internal.h | 1
mm/mm_init.c | 1
mm/page_alloc.c | 47 ----------------------------------------------
3 files changed, 49 deletions(-)
--- a/mm/internal.h~mm-page_alloc-fix-race-condition-in-unaccepted-memory-handling
+++ a/mm/internal.h
@@ -1590,7 +1590,6 @@ unsigned long move_page_tables(struct pa
#ifdef CONFIG_UNACCEPTED_MEMORY
void accept_page(struct page *page);
-void unaccepted_cleanup_work(struct work_struct *work);
#else /* CONFIG_UNACCEPTED_MEMORY */
static inline void accept_page(struct page *page)
{
--- a/mm/mm_init.c~mm-page_alloc-fix-race-condition-in-unaccepted-memory-handling
+++ a/mm/mm_init.c
@@ -1441,7 +1441,6 @@ static void __meminit zone_init_free_lis
#ifdef CONFIG_UNACCEPTED_MEMORY
INIT_LIST_HEAD(&zone->unaccepted_pages);
- INIT_WORK(&zone->unaccepted_cleanup, unaccepted_cleanup_work);
#endif
}
--- a/mm/page_alloc.c~mm-page_alloc-fix-race-condition-in-unaccepted-memory-handling
+++ a/mm/page_alloc.c
@@ -7172,16 +7172,8 @@ bool has_managed_dma(void)
#ifdef CONFIG_UNACCEPTED_MEMORY
-/* Counts number of zones with unaccepted pages. */
-static DEFINE_STATIC_KEY_FALSE(zones_with_unaccepted_pages);
-
static bool lazy_accept = true;
-void unaccepted_cleanup_work(struct work_struct *work)
-{
- static_branch_dec(&zones_with_unaccepted_pages);
-}
-
static int __init accept_memory_parse(char *p)
{
if (!strcmp(p, "lazy")) {
@@ -7206,11 +7198,7 @@ static bool page_contains_unaccepted(str
static void __accept_page(struct zone *zone, unsigned long *flags,
struct page *page)
{
- bool last;
-
list_del(&page->lru);
- last = list_empty(&zone->unaccepted_pages);
-
account_freepages(zone, -MAX_ORDER_NR_PAGES, MIGRATE_MOVABLE);
__mod_zone_page_state(zone, NR_UNACCEPTED, -MAX_ORDER_NR_PAGES);
__ClearPageUnaccepted(page);
@@ -7219,28 +7207,6 @@ static void __accept_page(struct zone *z
accept_memory(page_to_phys(page), PAGE_SIZE << MAX_PAGE_ORDER);
__free_pages_ok(page, MAX_PAGE_ORDER, FPI_TO_TAIL);
-
- if (last) {
- /*
- * There are two corner cases:
- *
- * - If allocation occurs during the CPU bring up,
- * static_branch_dec() cannot be used directly as
- * it causes a deadlock on cpu_hotplug_lock.
- *
- * Instead, use schedule_work() to prevent deadlock.
- *
- * - If allocation occurs before workqueues are initialized,
- * static_branch_dec() should be called directly.
- *
- * Workqueues are initialized before CPU bring up, so this
- * will not conflict with the first scenario.
- */
- if (system_wq)
- schedule_work(&zone->unaccepted_cleanup);
- else
- unaccepted_cleanup_work(&zone->unaccepted_cleanup);
- }
}
void accept_page(struct page *page)
@@ -7277,20 +7243,12 @@ static bool try_to_accept_memory_one(str
return true;
}
-static inline bool has_unaccepted_memory(void)
-{
- return static_branch_unlikely(&zones_with_unaccepted_pages);
-}
-
static bool cond_accept_memory(struct zone *zone, unsigned int order,
int alloc_flags)
{
long to_accept, wmark;
bool ret = false;
- if (!has_unaccepted_memory())
- return false;
-
if (list_empty(&zone->unaccepted_pages))
return false;
@@ -7328,22 +7286,17 @@ static bool __free_unaccepted(struct pag
{
struct zone *zone = page_zone(page);
unsigned long flags;
- bool first = false;
if (!lazy_accept)
return false;
spin_lock_irqsave(&zone->lock, flags);
- first = list_empty(&zone->unaccepted_pages);
list_add_tail(&page->lru, &zone->unaccepted_pages);
account_freepages(zone, MAX_ORDER_NR_PAGES, MIGRATE_MOVABLE);
__mod_zone_page_state(zone, NR_UNACCEPTED, MAX_ORDER_NR_PAGES);
__SetPageUnaccepted(page);
spin_unlock_irqrestore(&zone->lock, flags);
- if (first)
- static_branch_inc(&zones_with_unaccepted_pages);
-
return true;
}
_
Patches currently in -mm which might be from kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com are
reply other threads:[~2025-05-12 0:26 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: [no followups] expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20250512002657.B2AB4C4CEEF@smtp.kernel.org \
--to=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=bp@alien8.de \
--cc=hannes@cmpxchg.org \
--cc=jackmanb@google.com \
--cc=kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com \
--cc=mhocko@suse.com \
--cc=mm-commits@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=surenb@google.com \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=vbabka@suse.cz \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.