From: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
To: mm-commits@vger.kernel.org,ziy@nvidia.com,x86@kernel.org,richard@nod.at,muchun.song@linux.dev,johannes@sipsolutions.net,geert@linux-m68k.org,david@redhat.com,davem@davemloft.net,dave.hansen@linux.intel.com,anton.ivanov@cambridgegreys.com,andreas@gaisler.com,agordeev@linux.ibm.com,willy@infradead.org,akpm@linux-foundation.org
Subject: [merged mm-stable] mm-set-the-pte-dirty-if-the-folio-is-already-dirty.patch removed from -mm tree
Date: Sun, 11 May 2025 17:49:34 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20250512004935.8243AC4CEE4@smtp.kernel.org> (raw)
The quilt patch titled
Subject: mm: set the pte dirty if the folio is already dirty
has been removed from the -mm tree. Its filename was
mm-set-the-pte-dirty-if-the-folio-is-already-dirty.patch
This patch was dropped because it was merged into the mm-stable branch
of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/akpm/mm
------------------------------------------------------
From: "Matthew Wilcox (Oracle)" <willy@infradead.org>
Subject: mm: set the pte dirty if the folio is already dirty
Date: Wed, 2 Apr 2025 19:16:55 +0100
Patch series "Add folio_mk_pte()", v2.
Today if you have a folio and want to create a PTE that points to the
first page in it, you have to convert from a folio to a page. That's
zero-cost today but will be more expensive in the future.
I didn't want to add folio_mk_pte() to each architecture, and I didn't
want to lose any optimisations that architectures have from their own
implementation of mk_pte(). Fortunately, most architectures have by now
turned their mk_pte() into a fairly bland variant of pfn_pte(), but s390
has a special optimisation that needs to be moved into generic code in the
first patch.
At the end of this patch set, we have mk_pte() and folio_mk_pte() in mm.h
and each architecture only has to implement pfn_pte(). We've also
eliminated mk_huge_pte(), mk_huge_pmd() and mk_pmd().
This patch (of 11):
If the first access to a folio is a read that is then followed by a write,
we can save a page fault. s390 implemented this in their mk_pte() in
commit abf09bed3cce ("s390/mm: implement software dirty bits"), but other
architectures can also benefit from this.
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20250402181709.2386022-1-willy@infradead.org
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20250402181709.2386022-2-willy@infradead.org
Signed-off-by: Matthew Wilcox (Oracle) <willy@infradead.org>
Acked-by: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Alexander Gordeev <agordeev@linux.ibm.com> # for s390
Cc: Zi Yan <ziy@nvidia.com>
Cc: Andreas Larsson <andreas@gaisler.com>
Cc: Anton Ivanov <anton.ivanov@cambridgegreys.com>
Cc: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com>
Cc: "David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>
Cc: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@linux-m68k.org>
Cc: Johannes Berg <johannes@sipsolutions.net>
Cc: Muchun Song <muchun.song@linux.dev>
Cc: Richard Weinberger <richard@nod.at>
Cc: <x86@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
---
arch/s390/include/asm/pgtable.h | 7 +------
mm/memory.c | 2 ++
2 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
--- a/arch/s390/include/asm/pgtable.h~mm-set-the-pte-dirty-if-the-folio-is-already-dirty
+++ a/arch/s390/include/asm/pgtable.h
@@ -1450,12 +1450,7 @@ static inline pte_t mk_pte_phys(unsigned
static inline pte_t mk_pte(struct page *page, pgprot_t pgprot)
{
- unsigned long physpage = page_to_phys(page);
- pte_t __pte = mk_pte_phys(physpage, pgprot);
-
- if (pte_write(__pte) && PageDirty(page))
- __pte = pte_mkdirty(__pte);
- return __pte;
+ return mk_pte_phys(page_to_phys(page), pgprot);
}
#define pgd_index(address) (((address) >> PGDIR_SHIFT) & (PTRS_PER_PGD-1))
--- a/mm/memory.c~mm-set-the-pte-dirty-if-the-folio-is-already-dirty
+++ a/mm/memory.c
@@ -5245,6 +5245,8 @@ void set_pte_range(struct vm_fault *vmf,
if (write)
entry = maybe_mkwrite(pte_mkdirty(entry), vma);
+ else if (pte_write(entry) && folio_test_dirty(folio))
+ entry = pte_mkdirty(entry);
if (unlikely(vmf_orig_pte_uffd_wp(vmf)))
entry = pte_mkuffd_wp(entry);
/* copy-on-write page */
_
Patches currently in -mm which might be from willy@infradead.org are
reply other threads:[~2025-05-12 0:49 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: [no followups] expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20250512004935.8243AC4CEE4@smtp.kernel.org \
--to=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=agordeev@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=andreas@gaisler.com \
--cc=anton.ivanov@cambridgegreys.com \
--cc=dave.hansen@linux.intel.com \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=david@redhat.com \
--cc=geert@linux-m68k.org \
--cc=johannes@sipsolutions.net \
--cc=mm-commits@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=muchun.song@linux.dev \
--cc=richard@nod.at \
--cc=willy@infradead.org \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
--cc=ziy@nvidia.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.