From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (aws-us-west-2-korg-mail-1.web.codeaurora.org [10.30.226.201]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E8D622309BD for ; Mon, 12 May 2025 15:14:31 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1747062872; cv=none; b=iXkTUTAoAkmgOTgTavlRplNLFbObaO6KMry4D/7jiAvTrRxTXYLd7+ePhpjhW5vhTe0W3sl1cv3nuM3bvYK+Rggc59GFkL15M/KKa7uBX9WJb5UFvO0OlSt1F+VDXS3EWMR0eDO5EamU/G6I/Hr2KrWEemHCL9Pae39+wTPo+f8= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1747062872; c=relaxed/simple; bh=rUdOmlSRphu5xLNAoKkNiQhyFSGkiO10hUWuen9gcwM=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:References:MIME-Version: Content-Type:Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To; b=BSf7e06P94BMh3uJbs2p616ARMptGmK64kGc0g+N7tolwIumKTQx682drPqfOFG003CLqtSnTZkZKMU9Pof3wfzT6BDqOcI5slfcHJlFJAS5G2YZqBH1Vzn3wD9RRk0xDP1jzn3SqMqpt9lXaqDiw5SFXE1s7sZYVvT1OnSPQ7Y= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b=dfqP+Vd1; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b="dfqP+Vd1" Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 3BBA7C4CEE7; Mon, 12 May 2025 15:14:31 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=k20201202; t=1747062871; bh=rUdOmlSRphu5xLNAoKkNiQhyFSGkiO10hUWuen9gcwM=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:From; b=dfqP+Vd1rO7D5iQ/6gjN35MtBxKh2xbB+0OE4UV5jv7fBb+toODAZ1Od6rzeg0qMl CBkAN7z2Laugx3hIZoZSAfF8MxWkBnvl/5YGFP2jyEiq3qrWjXK3q7pKbTMeFIoJnO pQstfm3x/75eflW033aCHnQCdmzck4chvKTnT3jOfLXpI3hIXl6a6DdtHS2ZZ3BuAk z57UT/yABPILn940+WjXalCycm0tjRNHg7rFElKmcXqMh44CI8stvMhrp+CLfYkZfU ztLsuClJFGMG5f0zlHlda9LQuMp+Fr4pOVv6RXI41BSBfs/cQM6OsQDrUlVK2BLWB/ uKiRMYi9FMh/A== Date: Mon, 12 May 2025 08:14:30 -0700 From: "Darrick J. Wong" To: Christoph Hellwig Cc: Carlos Maiolino , xfs Subject: Re: [PATCH] xfs: remove some EXPERIMENTAL warnings Message-ID: <20250512151430.GF2701446@frogsfrogsfrogs> References: <20250510155301.GC2701446@frogsfrogsfrogs> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: On Sun, May 11, 2025 at 09:34:24PM -0700, Christoph Hellwig wrote: > On Sat, May 10, 2025 at 08:53:01AM -0700, Darrick J. Wong wrote: > > From: Darrick J. Wong > > > > Online fsck was finished a year ago, in Linux 6.10. The exchange-range > > syscall and parent pointers were merged in the same cycle. None of > > these have encountered any serious errors in the year that they've been > > in the kernel (or the many many years they've been under development) so > > let's drop the shouty warnings. > > Looks good. Talking about experimental warnings, I'd also like to > drop the pnfs warning. The code has been around forever, and while > we found occasional issues in the nfsd side of it, they were quickly > fixed. I agree, let's drop the pnfs warning since warts or not the code has been stable for a long time. However, would you (hch) mind writing that patch since you're the author of xfs_pnfs.c and I've never even used it. --D