[PATCH 6.6.y 2/2] bpf, arm64: Fix address emission with tag-based KASAN enabled

[bin.lan.cn@windriver.com]

From: Peter Collingbourne <pcc@google.com>

[ Upstream commit a552e2ef5fd1a6c78267cd4ec5a9b49aa11bbb1c ]

When BPF_TRAMP_F_CALL_ORIG is enabled, the address of a bpf_tramp_image
struct on the stack is passed during the size calculation pass and
an address on the heap is passed during code generation. This may
cause a heap buffer overflow if the heap address is tagged because
emit_a64_mov_i64() will emit longer code than it did during the size
calculation pass. The same problem could occur without tag-based
KASAN if one of the 16-bit words of the stack address happened to
be all-ones during the size calculation pass. Fix the problem by
assuming the worst case (4 instructions) when calculating the size
of the bpf_tramp_image address emission.

Fixes: 19d3c179a377 ("bpf, arm64: Fix trampoline for BPF_TRAMP_F_CALL_ORIG")
Signed-off-by: Peter Collingbourne <pcc@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
Acked-by: Xu Kuohai <xukuohai@huawei.com>
Link: https://linux-review.googlesource.com/id/I1496f2bc24fba7a1d492e16e2b94cf43714f2d3c
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20241018221644.3240898-1-pcc@google.com
[Minor context change fixed.]
Signed-off-by: Bin Lan <bin.lan.cn@windriver.com>
Signed-off-by: He Zhe <zhe.he@windriver.com>
---
Build test passed.
---
 arch/arm64/net/bpf_jit_comp.c | 12 ++++++++++--
 1 file changed, 10 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/arm64/net/bpf_jit_comp.c b/arch/arm64/net/bpf_jit_comp.c
index 7c5156e7d31e..95724f58399b 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/net/bpf_jit_comp.c
+++ b/arch/arm64/net/bpf_jit_comp.c
@@ -1952,7 +1952,11 @@ static int prepare_trampoline(struct jit_ctx *ctx, struct bpf_tramp_image *im,
 	emit(A64_STR64I(A64_R(20), A64_SP, regs_off + 8), ctx);
 
 	if (flags & BPF_TRAMP_F_CALL_ORIG) {
-		emit_a64_mov_i64(A64_R(0), (const u64)im, ctx);
+		/* for the first pass, assume the worst case */
+		if (!ctx->image)
+			ctx->idx += 4;
+		else
+			emit_a64_mov_i64(A64_R(0), (const u64)im, ctx);
 		emit_call((const u64)__bpf_tramp_enter, ctx);
 	}
 
@@ -1996,7 +2000,11 @@ static int prepare_trampoline(struct jit_ctx *ctx, struct bpf_tramp_image *im,
 
 	if (flags & BPF_TRAMP_F_CALL_ORIG) {
 		im->ip_epilogue = ctx->image + ctx->idx;
-		emit_a64_mov_i64(A64_R(0), (const u64)im, ctx);
+		/* for the first pass, assume the worst case */
+		if (!ctx->image)
+			ctx->idx += 4;
+		else
+			emit_a64_mov_i64(A64_R(0), (const u64)im, ctx);
 		emit_call((const u64)__bpf_tramp_exit, ctx);
 	}
 
-- 
2.34.1