All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
To: mm-commits@vger.kernel.org,ziy@nvidia.com,willy@infradead.org,wangkefeng.wang@huawei.com,shaggy@kernel.org,jane.chu@oracle.com,donettom@linux.ibm.com,david@redhat.com,apopple@nvidia.com,shivankg@amd.com,akpm@linux-foundation.org
Subject: [merged mm-stable] mm-add-folio_expected_ref_count-for-reference-count-calculation.patch removed from -mm tree
Date: Mon, 12 May 2025 23:54:57 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20250513065458.17919C4CEE4@smtp.kernel.org> (raw)


The quilt patch titled
     Subject: mm: add folio_expected_ref_count() for reference count calculation
has been removed from the -mm tree.  Its filename was
     mm-add-folio_expected_ref_count-for-reference-count-calculation.patch

This patch was dropped because it was merged into the mm-stable branch
of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/akpm/mm

------------------------------------------------------
From: Shivank Garg <shivankg@amd.com>
Subject: mm: add folio_expected_ref_count() for reference count calculation
Date: Wed, 30 Apr 2025 10:01:51 +0000

Patch series " JFS: Implement migrate_folio for jfs_metapage_aops" v5.

This patchset addresses a warning that occurs during memory compaction due
to JFS's missing migrate_folio operation.  The warning was introduced by
commit 7ee3647243e5 ("migrate: Remove call to ->writepage") which added
explicit warnings when filesystem don't implement migrate_folio.

The syzbot reported following [1]:
  jfs_metapage_aops does not implement migrate_folio
  WARNING: CPU: 1 PID: 5861 at mm/migrate.c:955 fallback_migrate_folio mm/migrate.c:953 [inline]
  WARNING: CPU: 1 PID: 5861 at mm/migrate.c:955 move_to_new_folio+0x70e/0x840 mm/migrate.c:1007
  Modules linked in:
  CPU: 1 UID: 0 PID: 5861 Comm: syz-executor280 Not tainted 6.15.0-rc1-next-20250411-syzkaller #0 PREEMPT(full) 
  Hardware name: Google Google Compute Engine/Google Compute Engine, BIOS Google 02/12/2025
  RIP: 0010:fallback_migrate_folio mm/migrate.c:953 [inline]
  RIP: 0010:move_to_new_folio+0x70e/0x840 mm/migrate.c:1007

To fix this issue, this series implement metapage_migrate_folio() for JFS
which handles both single and multiple metapages per page configurations.

While most filesystems leverage existing migration implementations like
filemap_migrate_folio(), buffer_migrate_folio_norefs() or
buffer_migrate_folio() (which internally used folio_expected_refs()),
JFS's metapage architecture requires special handling of its private data
during migration.  To support this, this series introduce the
folio_expected_ref_count(), which calculates external references to a
folio from page/swap cache, private data, and page table mappings.

This standardized implementation replaces the previous ad-hoc
folio_expected_refs() function and enables JFS to accurately determine
whether a folio has unexpected references before attempting migration.




Implement folio_expected_ref_count() to calculate expected folio reference
counts from:
- Page/swap cache (1 per page)
- Private data (1)
- Page table mappings (1 per map)

While originally needed for page migration operations, this improved
implementation standardizes reference counting by consolidating all
refcount contributors into a single, reusable function that can benefit
any subsystem needing to detect unexpected references to folios.

The folio_expected_ref_count() returns the sum of these external
references without including any reference the caller itself might hold. 
Callers comparing against the actual folio_ref_count() must account for
their own references separately.

Link: https://syzkaller.appspot.com/bug?extid=8bb6fd945af4e0ad9299 [1]
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20250430100150.279751-1-shivankg@amd.com
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20250430100150.279751-2-shivankg@amd.com
Signed-off-by: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Shivank Garg <shivankg@amd.com>
Suggested-by: Matthew Wilcox <willy@infradead.org>
Co-developed-by: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>
Cc: Alistair Popple <apopple@nvidia.com>
Cc: Dave Kleikamp <shaggy@kernel.org>
Cc: Donet Tom <donettom@linux.ibm.com>
Cc: Jane Chu <jane.chu@oracle.com>
Cc: Kefeng Wang <wangkefeng.wang@huawei.com>
Cc: Zi Yan <ziy@nvidia.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
---

 include/linux/mm.h |   55 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
 mm/migrate.c       |   22 +++--------------
 2 files changed, 59 insertions(+), 18 deletions(-)

--- a/include/linux/mm.h~mm-add-folio_expected_ref_count-for-reference-count-calculation
+++ a/include/linux/mm.h
@@ -2114,6 +2114,61 @@ static inline bool folio_maybe_mapped_sh
 	return test_bit(FOLIO_MM_IDS_SHARED_BITNUM, &folio->_mm_ids);
 }
 
+/**
+ * folio_expected_ref_count - calculate the expected folio refcount
+ * @folio: the folio
+ *
+ * Calculate the expected folio refcount, taking references from the pagecache,
+ * swapcache, PG_private and page table mappings into account. Useful in
+ * combination with folio_ref_count() to detect unexpected references (e.g.,
+ * GUP or other temporary references).
+ *
+ * Does currently not consider references from the LRU cache. If the folio
+ * was isolated from the LRU (which is the case during migration or split),
+ * the LRU cache does not apply.
+ *
+ * Calling this function on an unmapped folio -- !folio_mapped() -- that is
+ * locked will return a stable result.
+ *
+ * Calling this function on a mapped folio will not result in a stable result,
+ * because nothing stops additional page table mappings from coming (e.g.,
+ * fork()) or going (e.g., munmap()).
+ *
+ * Calling this function without the folio lock will also not result in a
+ * stable result: for example, the folio might get dropped from the swapcache
+ * concurrently.
+ *
+ * However, even when called without the folio lock or on a mapped folio,
+ * this function can be used to detect unexpected references early (for example,
+ * if it makes sense to even lock the folio and unmap it).
+ *
+ * The caller must add any reference (e.g., from folio_try_get()) it might be
+ * holding itself to the result.
+ *
+ * Returns the expected folio refcount.
+ */
+static inline int folio_expected_ref_count(const struct folio *folio)
+{
+	const int order = folio_order(folio);
+	int ref_count = 0;
+
+	if (WARN_ON_ONCE(folio_test_slab(folio)))
+		return 0;
+
+	if (folio_test_anon(folio)) {
+		/* One reference per page from the swapcache. */
+		ref_count += folio_test_swapcache(folio) << order;
+	} else if (!((unsigned long)folio->mapping & PAGE_MAPPING_FLAGS)) {
+		/* One reference per page from the pagecache. */
+		ref_count += !!folio->mapping << order;
+		/* One reference from PG_private. */
+		ref_count += folio_test_private(folio);
+	}
+
+	/* One reference per page table mapping. */
+	return ref_count + folio_mapcount(folio);
+}
+
 #ifndef HAVE_ARCH_MAKE_FOLIO_ACCESSIBLE
 static inline int arch_make_folio_accessible(struct folio *folio)
 {
--- a/mm/migrate.c~mm-add-folio_expected_ref_count-for-reference-count-calculation
+++ a/mm/migrate.c
@@ -445,20 +445,6 @@ unlock:
 }
 #endif
 
-static int folio_expected_refs(struct address_space *mapping,
-		struct folio *folio)
-{
-	int refs = 1;
-	if (!mapping)
-		return refs;
-
-	refs += folio_nr_pages(folio);
-	if (folio_test_private(folio))
-		refs++;
-
-	return refs;
-}
-
 /*
  * Replace the folio in the mapping.
  *
@@ -601,7 +587,7 @@ static int __folio_migrate_mapping(struc
 int folio_migrate_mapping(struct address_space *mapping,
 		struct folio *newfolio, struct folio *folio, int extra_count)
 {
-	int expected_count = folio_expected_refs(mapping, folio) + extra_count;
+	int expected_count = folio_expected_ref_count(folio) + extra_count + 1;
 
 	if (folio_ref_count(folio) != expected_count)
 		return -EAGAIN;
@@ -618,7 +604,7 @@ int migrate_huge_page_move_mapping(struc
 				   struct folio *dst, struct folio *src)
 {
 	XA_STATE(xas, &mapping->i_pages, folio_index(src));
-	int rc, expected_count = folio_expected_refs(mapping, src);
+	int rc, expected_count = folio_expected_ref_count(src) + 1;
 
 	if (folio_ref_count(src) != expected_count)
 		return -EAGAIN;
@@ -749,7 +735,7 @@ static int __migrate_folio(struct addres
 			   struct folio *src, void *src_private,
 			   enum migrate_mode mode)
 {
-	int rc, expected_count = folio_expected_refs(mapping, src);
+	int rc, expected_count = folio_expected_ref_count(src) + 1;
 
 	/* Check whether src does not have extra refs before we do more work */
 	if (folio_ref_count(src) != expected_count)
@@ -837,7 +823,7 @@ static int __buffer_migrate_folio(struct
 		return migrate_folio(mapping, dst, src, mode);
 
 	/* Check whether page does not have extra refs before we do more work */
-	expected_count = folio_expected_refs(mapping, src);
+	expected_count = folio_expected_ref_count(src) + 1;
 	if (folio_ref_count(src) != expected_count)
 		return -EAGAIN;
 
_

Patches currently in -mm which might be from shivankg@amd.com are



                 reply	other threads:[~2025-05-13  6:54 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: [no followups] expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20250513065458.17919C4CEE4@smtp.kernel.org \
    --to=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=apopple@nvidia.com \
    --cc=david@redhat.com \
    --cc=donettom@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=jane.chu@oracle.com \
    --cc=mm-commits@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=shaggy@kernel.org \
    --cc=shivankg@amd.com \
    --cc=wangkefeng.wang@huawei.com \
    --cc=willy@infradead.org \
    --cc=ziy@nvidia.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.