From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (aws-us-west-2-korg-mail-1.web.codeaurora.org [10.30.226.201]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 56D752BF96B for ; Tue, 13 May 2025 18:50:56 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1747162256; cv=none; b=TF4VCTP/OOuiO3jYdayulZlAQbQLrSacHl8FWuwmH7DUdfTftf7LlnJ1ADhLFEMnrE6tHu4SB7TuL3zbdi96zGeYQ1UW0ZI8iATdXjBe9GwVhLwNogcBPoxq73Z1SBDa7upCQgTYn0bQ+ty/MDNbGQfoOT4385+iVVibeHpxWi4= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1747162256; c=relaxed/simple; bh=HvPqrC1DHxS5/bJOHcE1jwzcAkMbES86sfu9SdJwLxA=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:References:MIME-Version: Content-Type:Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To; b=iDb58oCSQ1+rJ3vVNvtUSqpdh2LFV80aGfror23mHmXDbiz+yyRpMRv+T46fAJqD2O5/7TZVvK5oc0LMdnw7YN8oMKYxcOZHOROTAbXqiAMsehl20P576as2pu1YfoKn1wZGKyjCWUqj+3C6IQhbmKMBc+2hcaYsbkR805L4XUA= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b=b7otX9U8; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b="b7otX9U8" Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 29964C4CEE4; Tue, 13 May 2025 18:50:56 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=k20201202; t=1747162256; bh=HvPqrC1DHxS5/bJOHcE1jwzcAkMbES86sfu9SdJwLxA=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:From; b=b7otX9U8KXunauw2biI1e6d7vnXqpO7lPdYNmg9v3iIUtY6c/oFLHSQwwpWH8Lfpa Ghjf42WzBN7ToEdQWYaohPW0NoJfi6kSpJg1n4m62yE8KaEs/M1d7FiYo5eracOMpI K265R2ukIGQRtpwvV92FzCh9bpluqLQYyxQMetXAObuvj4NSfjWBt+paIPFw0TN8K9 ZE9Q9hTjsSfGS0rE+dC2dkYn4gdVH1g1/8Po3dFhfHil/mWdf1flwwWNhcC5/TO2RK GUxn33uptsLE/I/hrTsh3t7VFE57EQF2jt23PfVhZyRy+bPgakUcHAHaghxmZTcoJH OHuTYtheZtzwg== Date: Tue, 13 May 2025 11:50:55 -0700 From: "Darrick J. Wong" To: Carlos Maiolino Cc: xfs Subject: Re: [PATCH] xfs: remove some EXPERIMENTAL warnings Message-ID: <20250513185055.GH25700@frogsfrogsfrogs> References: <20250510155301.GC2701446@frogsfrogsfrogs> <174715788805.709704.13710865404538859491.b4-ty@kernel.org> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <174715788805.709704.13710865404538859491.b4-ty@kernel.org> On Tue, May 13, 2025 at 07:38:08PM +0200, Carlos Maiolino wrote: > On Sat, 10 May 2025 08:53:01 -0700, Darrick J. Wong wrote: > > Online fsck was finished a year ago, in Linux 6.10. The exchange-range > > syscall and parent pointers were merged in the same cycle. None of > > these have encountered any serious errors in the year that they've been > > in the kernel (or the many many years they've been under development) so > > let's drop the shouty warnings. > > > > > > [...] > > Applied to for-next, thanks! > > [1/1] xfs: remove some EXPERIMENTAL warnings > (no commit info) Er... there's a V2 out with slightly more aggressive cleanups of now-defunct OPSTATE bits. --D > Best regards, > -- > Carlos Maiolino >