From: Kuniyuki Iwashima <kuniyu@amazon.com>
To: "David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
David Ahern <dsahern@kernel.org>,
Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>,
"Paolo Abeni" <pabeni@redhat.com>
Cc: Simon Horman <horms@kernel.org>,
Kuniyuki Iwashima <kuniyu@amazon.com>,
Kuniyuki Iwashima <kuni1840@gmail.com>, <netdev@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: [PATCH v1 net-next 2/7] inet: Remove rtnl_is_held arg of lwtunnel_valid_encap_type(_attr)?().
Date: Wed, 14 May 2025 13:18:55 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20250514201943.74456-3-kuniyu@amazon.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250514201943.74456-1-kuniyu@amazon.com>
Commit f130a0cc1b4f ("inet: fix lwtunnel_valid_encap_type() lock
imbalance") added the rtnl_is_held argument as a temporary fix while
I'm converting nexthop and IPv6 routing table to per-netns RTNL or RCU.
Now all callers of lwtunnel_valid_encap_type() do not hold RTNL.
Let's remove the argument.
Signed-off-by: Kuniyuki Iwashima <kuniyu@amazon.com>
---
include/net/lwtunnel.h | 13 +++++--------
net/core/lwtunnel.c | 15 +++------------
net/ipv4/fib_frontend.c | 4 ++--
net/ipv4/nexthop.c | 3 +--
net/ipv6/route.c | 6 ++----
5 files changed, 13 insertions(+), 28 deletions(-)
diff --git a/include/net/lwtunnel.h b/include/net/lwtunnel.h
index 39cd50300a18..c306ebe379a0 100644
--- a/include/net/lwtunnel.h
+++ b/include/net/lwtunnel.h
@@ -116,11 +116,9 @@ int lwtunnel_encap_add_ops(const struct lwtunnel_encap_ops *op,
int lwtunnel_encap_del_ops(const struct lwtunnel_encap_ops *op,
unsigned int num);
int lwtunnel_valid_encap_type(u16 encap_type,
- struct netlink_ext_ack *extack,
- bool rtnl_is_held);
+ struct netlink_ext_ack *extack);
int lwtunnel_valid_encap_type_attr(struct nlattr *attr, int len,
- struct netlink_ext_ack *extack,
- bool rtnl_is_held);
+ struct netlink_ext_ack *extack);
int lwtunnel_build_state(struct net *net, u16 encap_type,
struct nlattr *encap,
unsigned int family, const void *cfg,
@@ -203,15 +201,14 @@ static inline int lwtunnel_encap_del_ops(const struct lwtunnel_encap_ops *op,
}
static inline int lwtunnel_valid_encap_type(u16 encap_type,
- struct netlink_ext_ack *extack,
- bool rtnl_is_held)
+ struct netlink_ext_ack *extack)
{
NL_SET_ERR_MSG(extack, "CONFIG_LWTUNNEL is not enabled in this kernel");
return -EOPNOTSUPP;
}
+
static inline int lwtunnel_valid_encap_type_attr(struct nlattr *attr, int len,
- struct netlink_ext_ack *extack,
- bool rtnl_is_held)
+ struct netlink_ext_ack *extack)
{
/* return 0 since we are not walking attr looking for
* RTA_ENCAP_TYPE attribute on nexthops.
diff --git a/net/core/lwtunnel.c b/net/core/lwtunnel.c
index 60f27cb4e54f..f9d76d85d04f 100644
--- a/net/core/lwtunnel.c
+++ b/net/core/lwtunnel.c
@@ -149,8 +149,7 @@ int lwtunnel_build_state(struct net *net, u16 encap_type,
}
EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(lwtunnel_build_state);
-int lwtunnel_valid_encap_type(u16 encap_type, struct netlink_ext_ack *extack,
- bool rtnl_is_held)
+int lwtunnel_valid_encap_type(u16 encap_type, struct netlink_ext_ack *extack)
{
const struct lwtunnel_encap_ops *ops;
int ret = -EINVAL;
@@ -167,12 +166,7 @@ int lwtunnel_valid_encap_type(u16 encap_type, struct netlink_ext_ack *extack,
const char *encap_type_str = lwtunnel_encap_str(encap_type);
if (encap_type_str) {
- if (rtnl_is_held)
- __rtnl_unlock();
request_module("rtnl-lwt-%s", encap_type_str);
- if (rtnl_is_held)
- rtnl_lock();
-
ops = rcu_access_pointer(lwtun_encaps[encap_type]);
}
}
@@ -186,8 +180,7 @@ int lwtunnel_valid_encap_type(u16 encap_type, struct netlink_ext_ack *extack,
EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(lwtunnel_valid_encap_type);
int lwtunnel_valid_encap_type_attr(struct nlattr *attr, int remaining,
- struct netlink_ext_ack *extack,
- bool rtnl_is_held)
+ struct netlink_ext_ack *extack)
{
struct rtnexthop *rtnh = (struct rtnexthop *)attr;
struct nlattr *nla_entype;
@@ -208,9 +201,7 @@ int lwtunnel_valid_encap_type_attr(struct nlattr *attr, int remaining,
}
encap_type = nla_get_u16(nla_entype);
- if (lwtunnel_valid_encap_type(encap_type,
- extack,
- rtnl_is_held) != 0)
+ if (lwtunnel_valid_encap_type(encap_type, extack))
return -EOPNOTSUPP;
}
}
diff --git a/net/ipv4/fib_frontend.c b/net/ipv4/fib_frontend.c
index 57f088e5540e..fd1e1507a224 100644
--- a/net/ipv4/fib_frontend.c
+++ b/net/ipv4/fib_frontend.c
@@ -807,7 +807,7 @@ static int rtm_to_fib_config(struct net *net, struct sk_buff *skb,
case RTA_MULTIPATH:
err = lwtunnel_valid_encap_type_attr(nla_data(attr),
nla_len(attr),
- extack, false);
+ extack);
if (err < 0)
goto errout;
cfg->fc_mp = nla_data(attr);
@@ -825,7 +825,7 @@ static int rtm_to_fib_config(struct net *net, struct sk_buff *skb,
case RTA_ENCAP_TYPE:
cfg->fc_encap_type = nla_get_u16(attr);
err = lwtunnel_valid_encap_type(cfg->fc_encap_type,
- extack, false);
+ extack);
if (err < 0)
goto errout;
break;
diff --git a/net/ipv4/nexthop.c b/net/ipv4/nexthop.c
index 823e4a783d2b..4397e89d3123 100644
--- a/net/ipv4/nexthop.c
+++ b/net/ipv4/nexthop.c
@@ -3180,8 +3180,7 @@ static int rtm_to_nh_config(struct net *net, struct sk_buff *skb,
}
cfg->nh_encap_type = nla_get_u16(tb[NHA_ENCAP_TYPE]);
- err = lwtunnel_valid_encap_type(cfg->nh_encap_type,
- extack, false);
+ err = lwtunnel_valid_encap_type(cfg->nh_encap_type, extack);
if (err < 0)
goto out;
diff --git a/net/ipv6/route.c b/net/ipv6/route.c
index 44300962230b..6baf177c529b 100644
--- a/net/ipv6/route.c
+++ b/net/ipv6/route.c
@@ -5172,8 +5172,7 @@ static int rtm_to_fib6_multipath_config(struct fib6_config *cfg,
rtnh = rtnh_next(rtnh, &remaining);
} while (rtnh_ok(rtnh, remaining));
- return lwtunnel_valid_encap_type_attr(cfg->fc_mp, cfg->fc_mp_len,
- extack, false);
+ return lwtunnel_valid_encap_type_attr(cfg->fc_mp, cfg->fc_mp_len, extack);
}
static int rtm_to_fib6_config(struct sk_buff *skb, struct nlmsghdr *nlh,
@@ -5310,8 +5309,7 @@ static int rtm_to_fib6_config(struct sk_buff *skb, struct nlmsghdr *nlh,
if (tb[RTA_ENCAP_TYPE]) {
cfg->fc_encap_type = nla_get_u16(tb[RTA_ENCAP_TYPE]);
- err = lwtunnel_valid_encap_type(cfg->fc_encap_type,
- extack, false);
+ err = lwtunnel_valid_encap_type(cfg->fc_encap_type, extack);
if (err < 0)
goto errout;
}
--
2.49.0
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-05-14 20:20 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-05-14 20:18 [PATCH v1 net-next 0/7] ipv6: Follow up for RTNL-free RTM_NEWROUTE series Kuniyuki Iwashima
2025-05-14 20:18 ` [PATCH v1 net-next 1/7] ipv6: Remove rcu_read_lock() in fib6_get_table() Kuniyuki Iwashima
2025-05-14 20:18 ` Kuniyuki Iwashima [this message]
2025-05-14 20:18 ` [PATCH v1 net-next 3/7] ipv6: Narrow down RCU critical section in inet6_rtm_newroute() Kuniyuki Iwashima
2025-05-14 20:18 ` [PATCH v1 net-next 4/7] Revert "ipv6: sr: switch to GFP_ATOMIC flag to allocate memory during seg6local LWT setup" Kuniyuki Iwashima
2025-05-14 20:18 ` [PATCH v1 net-next 5/7] Revert "ipv6: Factorise ip6_route_multipath_add()." Kuniyuki Iwashima
2025-05-14 20:18 ` [PATCH v1 net-next 6/7] ipv6: Pass gfp_flags down to ip6_route_info_create_nh() Kuniyuki Iwashima
2025-05-14 20:19 ` [PATCH v1 net-next 7/7] ipv6: Revert two per-cpu var allocation for RTM_NEWROUTE Kuniyuki Iwashima
2025-05-15 1:45 ` [PATCH v1 net-next 0/7] ipv6: Follow up for RTNL-free RTM_NEWROUTE series Jakub Kicinski
2025-05-15 2:05 ` Kuniyuki Iwashima
2025-05-15 2:22 ` Jakub Kicinski
2025-05-15 9:02 ` Paolo Abeni
2025-05-15 16:46 ` Kuniyuki Iwashima
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20250514201943.74456-3-kuniyu@amazon.com \
--to=kuniyu@amazon.com \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=dsahern@kernel.org \
--cc=edumazet@google.com \
--cc=horms@kernel.org \
--cc=kuba@kernel.org \
--cc=kuni1840@gmail.com \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.