All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Shakeel Butt <shakeel.butt@linux.dev>
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org>,
	Michal Hocko <mhocko@kernel.org>,
	Roman Gushchin <roman.gushchin@linux.dev>,
	Muchun Song <muchun.song@linux.dev>,
	Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz>,
	Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>,
	Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@linutronix.de>,
	Harry Yoo <harry.yoo@oracle.com>,
	Yosry Ahmed <yosry.ahmed@linux.dev>,
	Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
	Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com>,
	bpf@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org, cgroups@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	Meta kernel team <kernel-team@meta.com>
Subject: [PATCH 5/5] memcg: make memcg_rstat_updated nmi safe
Date: Thu, 15 May 2025 23:49:12 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20250516064912.1515065-6-shakeel.butt@linux.dev> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250516064912.1515065-1-shakeel.butt@linux.dev>

memcg: convert stats_updates to atomic_t

Currently kernel maintains memory related stats updates per-cgroup to
optimize stats flushing. The stats_updates is defined as atomic64_t
which is not nmi-safe on some archs. Actually we don't really need 64bit
atomic as the max value stats_updates can get should be less than
nr_cpus * MEMCG_CHARGE_BATCH. A normal atomic_t should suffice.

Also the function cgroup_rstat_updated() is still not nmi-safe but there
is parallel effort to make it nmi-safe, so until then let's ignore it in
the nmi context.

Signed-off-by: Shakeel Butt <shakeel.butt@linux.dev>
---
 mm/memcontrol.c | 16 +++++++++-------
 1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)

diff --git a/mm/memcontrol.c b/mm/memcontrol.c
index 85519ce37f18..06d5d5407b00 100644
--- a/mm/memcontrol.c
+++ b/mm/memcontrol.c
@@ -533,7 +533,7 @@ struct memcg_vmstats {
 	unsigned long		events_pending[NR_MEMCG_EVENTS];
 
 	/* Stats updates since the last flush */
-	atomic64_t		stats_updates;
+	atomic_t		stats_updates;
 };
 
 /*
@@ -559,7 +559,7 @@ static u64 flush_last_time;
 
 static bool memcg_vmstats_needs_flush(struct memcg_vmstats *vmstats)
 {
-	return atomic64_read(&vmstats->stats_updates) >
+	return atomic_read(&vmstats->stats_updates) >
 		MEMCG_CHARGE_BATCH * num_online_cpus();
 }
 
@@ -573,7 +573,9 @@ static inline void memcg_rstat_updated(struct mem_cgroup *memcg, int val,
 	if (!val)
 		return;
 
-	cgroup_rstat_updated(memcg->css.cgroup, cpu);
+	/* TODO: add to cgroup update tree once it is nmi-safe. */
+	if (!in_nmi())
+		cgroup_rstat_updated(memcg->css.cgroup, cpu);
 	statc_pcpu = memcg->vmstats_percpu;
 	for (; statc_pcpu; statc_pcpu = statc->parent_pcpu) {
 		statc = this_cpu_ptr(statc_pcpu);
@@ -591,7 +593,7 @@ static inline void memcg_rstat_updated(struct mem_cgroup *memcg, int val,
 			continue;
 
 		stats_updates = this_cpu_xchg(statc_pcpu->stats_updates, 0);
-		atomic64_add(stats_updates, &statc->vmstats->stats_updates);
+		atomic_add(stats_updates, &statc->vmstats->stats_updates);
 	}
 }
 
@@ -599,7 +601,7 @@ static void __mem_cgroup_flush_stats(struct mem_cgroup *memcg, bool force)
 {
 	bool needs_flush = memcg_vmstats_needs_flush(memcg->vmstats);
 
-	trace_memcg_flush_stats(memcg, atomic64_read(&memcg->vmstats->stats_updates),
+	trace_memcg_flush_stats(memcg, atomic_read(&memcg->vmstats->stats_updates),
 		force, needs_flush);
 
 	if (!force && !needs_flush)
@@ -4132,8 +4134,8 @@ static void mem_cgroup_css_rstat_flush(struct cgroup_subsys_state *css, int cpu)
 	}
 	WRITE_ONCE(statc->stats_updates, 0);
 	/* We are in a per-cpu loop here, only do the atomic write once */
-	if (atomic64_read(&memcg->vmstats->stats_updates))
-		atomic64_set(&memcg->vmstats->stats_updates, 0);
+	if (atomic_read(&memcg->vmstats->stats_updates))
+		atomic_set(&memcg->vmstats->stats_updates, 0);
 }
 
 static void mem_cgroup_fork(struct task_struct *task)
-- 
2.47.1


  parent reply	other threads:[~2025-05-16  6:50 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2025-05-16  6:49 [PATCH v2 0/5] memcg: nmi-safe kmem charging Shakeel Butt
2025-05-16  6:49 ` [PATCH 1/5] memcg: disable kmem charging in nmi for unsupported arch Shakeel Butt
2025-05-16  9:30   ` Vlastimil Babka
2025-05-16 15:37     ` Shakeel Butt
2025-05-16 18:20       ` Shakeel Butt
2025-05-16  6:49 ` [PATCH 2/5] memcg: nmi safe memcg stats for specific archs Shakeel Butt
2025-05-16  9:43   ` Vlastimil Babka
2025-05-16  6:49 ` [PATCH 3/5] memcg: add nmi-safe update for MEMCG_KMEM Shakeel Butt
2025-05-16  9:43   ` Vlastimil Babka
2025-05-16  6:49 ` [PATCH 4/5] memcg: nmi-safe slab stats updates Shakeel Butt
2025-05-16  9:44   ` Vlastimil Babka
2025-05-16  6:49 ` Shakeel Butt [this message]
2025-05-16  9:45   ` [PATCH 5/5] memcg: make memcg_rstat_updated nmi safe Vlastimil Babka
2025-05-16 15:34     ` Shakeel Butt

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20250516064912.1515065-6-shakeel.butt@linux.dev \
    --to=shakeel.butt@linux.dev \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=ast@kernel.org \
    --cc=bigeasy@linutronix.de \
    --cc=bpf@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=cgroups@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=hannes@cmpxchg.org \
    --cc=harry.yoo@oracle.com \
    --cc=kernel-team@meta.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com \
    --cc=mhocko@kernel.org \
    --cc=muchun.song@linux.dev \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=roman.gushchin@linux.dev \
    --cc=vbabka@suse.cz \
    --cc=yosry.ahmed@linux.dev \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.