[PATCH v3 5/5] memcg: make memcg_rstat_updated nmi safe

[Shakeel Butt <shakeel.butt@linux.dev>]

Currently kernel maintains memory related stats updates per-cgroup to
optimize stats flushing. The stats_updates is defined as atomic64_t
which is not nmi-safe on some archs. Actually we don't really need 64bit
atomic as the max value stats_updates can get should be less than
nr_cpus * MEMCG_CHARGE_BATCH. A normal atomic_t should suffice.

Also the function cgroup_rstat_updated() is still not nmi-safe but there
is parallel effort to make it nmi-safe, so until then let's ignore it in
the nmi context.

Signed-off-by: Shakeel Butt <shakeel.butt@linux.dev>
Acked-by: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz>
---
 mm/memcontrol.c | 16 +++++++++-------
 1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)

diff --git a/mm/memcontrol.c b/mm/memcontrol.c
index e96c5d1ca912..2ace30fcd0e6 100644
--- a/mm/memcontrol.c
+++ b/mm/memcontrol.c
@@ -533,7 +533,7 @@ struct memcg_vmstats {
 	unsigned long		events_pending[NR_MEMCG_EVENTS];
 
 	/* Stats updates since the last flush */
-	atomic64_t		stats_updates;
+	atomic_t		stats_updates;
 };
 
 /*
@@ -559,7 +559,7 @@ static u64 flush_last_time;
 
 static bool memcg_vmstats_needs_flush(struct memcg_vmstats *vmstats)
 {
-	return atomic64_read(&vmstats->stats_updates) >
+	return atomic_read(&vmstats->stats_updates) >
 		MEMCG_CHARGE_BATCH * num_online_cpus();
 }
 
@@ -573,7 +573,9 @@ static inline void memcg_rstat_updated(struct mem_cgroup *memcg, int val,
 	if (!val)
 		return;
 
-	cgroup_rstat_updated(memcg->css.cgroup, cpu);
+	/* TODO: add to cgroup update tree once it is nmi-safe. */
+	if (!in_nmi())
+		cgroup_rstat_updated(memcg->css.cgroup, cpu);
 	statc_pcpu = memcg->vmstats_percpu;
 	for (; statc_pcpu; statc_pcpu = statc->parent_pcpu) {
 		statc = this_cpu_ptr(statc_pcpu);
@@ -591,7 +593,7 @@ static inline void memcg_rstat_updated(struct mem_cgroup *memcg, int val,
 			continue;
 
 		stats_updates = this_cpu_xchg(statc_pcpu->stats_updates, 0);
-		atomic64_add(stats_updates, &statc->vmstats->stats_updates);
+		atomic_add(stats_updates, &statc->vmstats->stats_updates);
 	}
 }
 
@@ -599,7 +601,7 @@ static void __mem_cgroup_flush_stats(struct mem_cgroup *memcg, bool force)
 {
 	bool needs_flush = memcg_vmstats_needs_flush(memcg->vmstats);
 
-	trace_memcg_flush_stats(memcg, atomic64_read(&memcg->vmstats->stats_updates),
+	trace_memcg_flush_stats(memcg, atomic_read(&memcg->vmstats->stats_updates),
 		force, needs_flush);
 
 	if (!force && !needs_flush)
@@ -4132,8 +4134,8 @@ static void mem_cgroup_css_rstat_flush(struct cgroup_subsys_state *css, int cpu)
 	}
 	WRITE_ONCE(statc->stats_updates, 0);
 	/* We are in a per-cpu loop here, only do the atomic write once */
-	if (atomic64_read(&memcg->vmstats->stats_updates))
-		atomic64_set(&memcg->vmstats->stats_updates, 0);
+	if (atomic_read(&memcg->vmstats->stats_updates))
+		atomic_set(&memcg->vmstats->stats_updates, 0);
 }
 
 static void mem_cgroup_fork(struct task_struct *task)
-- 
2.47.1