All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>
To: Rik van Riel <riel@surriel.com>
Cc: oe-kbuild-all@lists.linux.dev
Subject: Re: [RFC v2 7/9] x86/mm: Introduce Remote Action Request
Date: Tue, 20 May 2025 22:58:47 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <202505202234.iwMSJRin-lkp@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250520010350.1740223-8-riel@surriel.com>

Hi Rik,

[This is a private test report for your RFC patch.]
kernel test robot noticed the following build errors:

[auto build test ERROR on tip/master]
[also build test ERROR on linus/master v6.15-rc7 next-20250516]
[cannot apply to tip/x86/core tip/x86/mm tip/auto-latest]
[If your patch is applied to the wrong git tree, kindly drop us a note.
And when submitting patch, we suggest to use '--base' as documented in
https://git-scm.com/docs/git-format-patch#_base_tree_information]

url:    https://github.com/intel-lab-lkp/linux/commits/Rik-van-Riel/x86-mm-Introduce-MSR_IA32_CORE_CAPABILITIES/20250520-090600
base:   tip/master
patch link:    https://lore.kernel.org/r/20250520010350.1740223-8-riel%40surriel.com
patch subject: [RFC v2 7/9] x86/mm: Introduce Remote Action Request
config: x86_64-buildonly-randconfig-001-20250520 (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20250520/202505202234.iwMSJRin-lkp@intel.com/config)
compiler: gcc-12 (Debian 12.2.0-14) 12.2.0
reproduce (this is a W=1 build): (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20250520/202505202234.iwMSJRin-lkp@intel.com/reproduce)

If you fix the issue in a separate patch/commit (i.e. not just a new version of
the same patch/commit), kindly add following tags
| Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>
| Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/oe-kbuild-all/202505202234.iwMSJRin-lkp@intel.com/

All errors (new ones prefixed by >>):

   arch/x86/mm/rar.c: In function 'smp_call_rar_many':
>> arch/x86/mm/rar.c:167:17: error: implicit declaration of function 'arch_send_rar_single_ipi' [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration]
     167 |                 arch_send_rar_single_ipi(cpu);
         |                 ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
>> arch/x86/mm/rar.c:188:9: error: implicit declaration of function 'arch_send_rar_ipi_mask' [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration]
     188 |         arch_send_rar_ipi_mask(dest_mask);
         |         ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
   cc1: some warnings being treated as errors


vim +/arch_send_rar_single_ipi +167 arch/x86/mm/rar.c

   123	
   124	/*
   125	 * This is a modified version of smp_call_function_many() of kernel/smp.c,
   126	 * without a function pointer, because the RAR handler is the ucode.
   127	 */
   128	void smp_call_rar_many(const struct cpumask *mask, u16 pcid,
   129			       unsigned long start, unsigned long end)
   130	{
   131		unsigned long pages = (end - start + PAGE_SIZE) / PAGE_SIZE;
   132		int cpu, next_cpu, this_cpu = smp_processor_id();
   133		cpumask_t *dest_mask;
   134		unsigned long idx;
   135	
   136		if (pages > RAR_INVLPG_MAX_PAGES || end == TLB_FLUSH_ALL)
   137			pages = RAR_INVLPG_MAX_PAGES;
   138	
   139		/*
   140		 * Can deadlock when called with interrupts disabled.
   141		 * We allow cpu's that are not yet online though, as no one else can
   142		 * send smp call function interrupt to this cpu and as such deadlocks
   143		 * can't happen.
   144		 */
   145		WARN_ON_ONCE(cpu_online(this_cpu) && irqs_disabled()
   146			     && !oops_in_progress && !early_boot_irqs_disabled);
   147	
   148		/* Try to fastpath.  So, what's a CPU they want?  Ignoring this one. */
   149		cpu = cpumask_first_and(mask, cpu_online_mask);
   150		if (cpu == this_cpu)
   151			cpu = cpumask_next_and(cpu, mask, cpu_online_mask);
   152	
   153		/* No online cpus?  We're done. */
   154		if (cpu >= nr_cpu_ids)
   155			return;
   156	
   157		/* Do we have another CPU which isn't us? */
   158		next_cpu = cpumask_next_and(cpu, mask, cpu_online_mask);
   159		if (next_cpu == this_cpu)
   160			next_cpu = cpumask_next_and(next_cpu, mask, cpu_online_mask);
   161	
   162		/* Fastpath: do that cpu by itself. */
   163		if (next_cpu >= nr_cpu_ids) {
   164			idx = get_payload();
   165			set_payload(idx, pcid, start, pages);
   166			set_action_entry(idx, cpu);
 > 167			arch_send_rar_single_ipi(cpu);
   168			wait_for_done(idx, cpu);
   169			free_payload(idx);
   170			return;
   171		}
   172	
   173		dest_mask = this_cpu_ptr(&rar_cpu_mask);
   174		cpumask_and(dest_mask, mask, cpu_online_mask);
   175		cpumask_clear_cpu(this_cpu, dest_mask);
   176	
   177		/* Some callers race with other cpus changing the passed mask */
   178		if (unlikely(!cpumask_weight(dest_mask)))
   179			return;
   180	
   181		idx = get_payload();
   182		set_payload(idx, pcid, start, pages);
   183	
   184		for_each_cpu(cpu, dest_mask)
   185			set_action_entry(idx, cpu);
   186	
   187		/* Send a message to all CPUs in the map */
 > 188		arch_send_rar_ipi_mask(dest_mask);

-- 
0-DAY CI Kernel Test Service
https://github.com/intel/lkp-tests/wiki

  parent reply	other threads:[~2025-05-20 14:59 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 36+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2025-05-20  1:02 [RFC v2 PATCH 0/9] Intel RAR TLB invalidation Rik van Riel
2025-05-20  1:02 ` [RFC v2 1/9] x86/mm: Introduce MSR_IA32_CORE_CAPABILITIES Rik van Riel
2025-05-21 14:57   ` Dave Hansen
2025-05-22 15:10   ` Sean Christopherson
2025-05-20  1:02 ` [RFC v2 2/9] x86/mm: Introduce Remote Action Request MSRs Rik van Riel
2025-05-21 11:49   ` Borislav Petkov
2025-05-20  1:02 ` [RFC v2 3/9] x86/mm: enable BROADCAST_TLB_FLUSH on Intel, too Rik van Riel
2025-05-20  1:02 ` [RFC v2 4/9] x86/mm: Introduce X86_FEATURE_RAR Rik van Riel
2025-05-21 11:53   ` Borislav Petkov
2025-05-21 13:57     ` Rik van Riel
2025-05-21 14:53       ` Borislav Petkov
2025-05-21 16:06         ` Rik van Riel
2025-05-21 19:39           ` Borislav Petkov
2025-05-20  1:02 ` [RFC v2 5/9] x86/mm: Change cpa_flush() to call flush_kernel_range() directly Rik van Riel
2025-05-21 11:54   ` Borislav Petkov
2025-05-21 15:16   ` Dave Hansen
2025-05-20  1:02 ` [RFC v2 6/9] x86/apic: Introduce Remote Action Request Operations Rik van Riel
2025-05-20  9:16   ` Ingo Molnar
2025-06-04  0:11     ` Rik van Riel
2025-05-21 15:28   ` Dave Hansen
2025-05-21 15:59     ` Rik van Riel
2025-05-20  1:02 ` [RFC v2 7/9] x86/mm: Introduce Remote Action Request Rik van Riel
2025-05-20  9:28   ` Ingo Molnar
2025-05-20 12:57     ` Rik van Riel
2025-05-24  9:22       ` Ingo Molnar
2025-05-20 11:29   ` Nadav Amit
2025-05-20 13:00     ` Rik van Riel
2025-05-20 20:26       ` Nadav Amit
2025-05-20 20:31         ` Rik van Riel
2025-05-20 14:58   ` kernel test robot [this message]
2025-05-21 16:38   ` Dave Hansen
2025-05-21 19:06     ` Thomas Gleixner
2025-06-03 20:08     ` Rik van Riel
2025-05-20  1:02 ` [RFC v2 8/9] x86/mm: use RAR for kernel TLB flushes Rik van Riel
2025-05-20  1:02 ` [RFC v2 9/9] x86/mm: userspace & pageout flushing using Intel RAR Rik van Riel
2025-05-20  2:48   ` [RFC v2.1 " Rik van Riel

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=202505202234.iwMSJRin-lkp@intel.com \
    --to=lkp@intel.com \
    --cc=oe-kbuild-all@lists.linux.dev \
    --cc=riel@surriel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.