From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (aws-us-west-2-korg-mail-1.web.codeaurora.org [10.30.226.201]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3266CBA36 for ; Wed, 21 May 2025 03:19:40 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1747797581; cv=none; b=KIIYW7vpY2CKzAI2LBJEYNp836kDUIQTWqx1CQMZ6tfHA86IFnLRHTzwmUesRH0s/JvqfAigEPcGOW4MXTK+qJBejDpQ7nCWqkRcdSru78RZUZsddGOMfU6J9QvYyMAydqw646WWNtp63hS/OZj3f2O8dBCvgKZmPmys6aa3NNM= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1747797581; c=relaxed/simple; bh=tVA2JwCgzi5+V8BN2//pbRQTpfH1zU/bwghjAd+nJ+Q=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:References:MIME-Version: Content-Type:Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To; b=SHSqbR56/xSdz3nRzGspks5yR1QU1BtJomqmtyp0rj8ZIMZQQD+sJSgzzMHbdFW4DgxJARRwyF+8wNUMxlEEKi1scn2mH7cvSZ36v4OKGTXvcjyLh8G2szK7ajJztTkLUkpcBJ1drPM9A3C+/Z59rXHnDOUjBs4Ixn00Ti9kKy8= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b=Z+GR4QxQ; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b="Z+GR4QxQ" Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 99B27C4CEE4; Wed, 21 May 2025 03:19:40 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=k20201202; t=1747797580; bh=tVA2JwCgzi5+V8BN2//pbRQTpfH1zU/bwghjAd+nJ+Q=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:From; b=Z+GR4QxQbyIIq6isac3ccllRAhAiBvUJtSzUIzFdK7rLyWSIHz05WR7o0QyU+LCw3 Gmx7MkTHzs1l9PbjvyKp5adeFfR9htddpXc2/N64KVO1NhSkKSdMaZUW0Y8DwTKkT+ GdLZW//2TMUYAp4XArsflyOs798Ou6OO+xHhWyE/VzzcwlCBNA7J5h80OrKx35vDDk q4ONGdGLITWNQ2aAJ/grpMCkr3TL4YAhpCu+L2Gy32K7utGu4OMjb/Xo9QytajmVNi k+IRBN6uCNOWWeI2/AiA5iuuVRFsImQzjOM9zRPkYeycEAxKFtiQucOahRJc9zWQcw w6KywUm1tW71w== Date: Tue, 20 May 2025 20:19:40 -0700 From: "Darrick J. Wong" To: Christoph Hellwig Cc: fstests@vger.kernel.org, Shin'ichiro Kawasaki Subject: Re: xfs/566 execution time Message-ID: <20250521031940.GF9730@frogsfrogsfrogs> References: Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: fstests@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: On Tue, May 20, 2025 at 07:08:58AM -0700, Christoph Hellwig wrote: > Hi Darrick, > > we regularly see execution times of more than half a day for xfs/566 > on a 30ish TB SMR HDD. Do you think there might be a useful way to > scale down the load on rotational devices? Hrmm. Is that the only one that does that, or do the other scrub tests take a while too? If it's just that one, and setting SOAK_DURATION=2m results in the test cutting off after 2min, then I'll craft some sort of fix to constrain the runtime. --D