Re: [RFC PATCH] mm: fix the inaccurate memory statistics issue for users

[SeongJae Park <sj@kernel.org>]

On Fri, 23 May 2025 11:16:13 +0800 Baolin Wang <baolin.wang@linux.alibaba.com> wrote:

> On some large machines with a high number of CPUs running a 64K kernel,

What does 64K kernel means?

> we found that the 'RES' field is always 0 displayed by the top command
> for some processes, which will cause a lot of confusion for users.
> 
>     PID USER      PR  NI    VIRT    RES    SHR S  %CPU  %MEM     TIME+ COMMAND
>  875525 root      20   0   12480      0      0 R   0.3   0.0   0:00.08 top
>       1 root      20   0  172800      0      0 S   0.0   0.0   0:04.52 systemd
> 
> The main reason is that the batch size of the percpu counter is quite large
> on these machines, caching a significant percpu value, since converting mm's
> rss stats into percpu_counter by commit f1a7941243c1 ("mm: convert mm's rss
> stats into percpu_counter"). Intuitively, the batch number should be optimized,
> but on some paths, performance may take precedence over statistical accuracy.
> Therefore, introducing a new interface to add the percpu statistical count
> and display it to users, which can remove the confusion. In addition, this
> change is not expected to be on a performance-critical path, so the modification
> should be acceptable.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Baolin Wang <baolin.wang@linux.alibaba.com>

Acked-by: SeongJae Park <sj@kernel.org>


Thanks,
SJ

[...]