From: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
To: mm-commits@vger.kernel.org,ptyadav@amazon.de,osalvador@suse.de,alexghiti@rivosinc.com,rppt@kernel.org,akpm@linux-foundation.org
Subject: [merged mm-hotfixes-stable] mm-cma-make-detection-of-highmem_start-more-robust.patch removed from -mm tree
Date: Sun, 25 May 2025 00:54:19 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20250525075420.8206BC4CEEA@smtp.kernel.org> (raw)
The quilt patch titled
Subject: mm/cma: make detection of highmem_start more robust
has been removed from the -mm tree. Its filename was
mm-cma-make-detection-of-highmem_start-more-robust.patch
This patch was dropped because it was merged into the mm-hotfixes-stable branch
of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/akpm/mm
------------------------------------------------------
From: "Mike Rapoport (Microsoft)" <rppt@kernel.org>
Subject: mm/cma: make detection of highmem_start more robust
Date: Mon, 19 May 2025 20:18:05 +0300
Pratyush Yadav reports the following crash:
------------[ cut here ]------------
kernel BUG at arch/x86/mm/physaddr.c:23!
ception 0x06 IP 10:ffffffff812ebbf8 error 0 cr2 0xffff88903ffff000
CPU: 0 UID: 0 PID: 0 Comm: swapper Not tainted 6.15.0-rc6+ #231 PREEMPT(undef)
Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996), BIOS Arch Linux 1.16.3-1-1 04/01/2014
RIP: 0010:__phys_addr+0x58/0x60
Code: 01 48 89 c2 48 d3 ea 48 85 d2 75 05 e9 91 52 cf 00 0f 0b 48 3d ff ff ff 1f 77 0f 48 8b 05 20 54 55 01 48 01 d0 e9 78 52 cf 00 <0f> 0b 90 0f 1f 44 00 00 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 90
RSP: 0000:ffffffff82803dd8 EFLAGS: 00010006 ORIG_RAX: 0000000000000000
RAX: 000000007fffffff RBX: 00000000ffffffff RCX: 0000000000000000
RDX: 000000007fffffff RSI: 0000000280000000 RDI: ffffffffffffffff
RBP: ffffffff82803e68 R08: 0000000000000000 R09: 0000000000000000
R10: ffffffff83153180 R11: ffffffff82803e48 R12: ffffffff83c9aed0
R13: 0000000000000000 R14: 0000001040000000 R15: 0000000000000000
FS: 0000000000000000(0000) GS:0000000000000000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000
CS: 0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033
CR2: ffff88903ffff000 CR3: 0000000002838000 CR4: 00000000000000b0
Call Trace:
<TASK>
? __cma_declare_contiguous_nid+0x6e/0x340
? cma_declare_contiguous_nid+0x33/0x70
? dma_contiguous_reserve_area+0x2f/0x70
? setup_arch+0x6f1/0x870
? start_kernel+0x52/0x4b0
? x86_64_start_reservations+0x29/0x30
? x86_64_start_kernel+0x7c/0x80
? common_startup_64+0x13e/0x141
The reason is that __cma_declare_contiguous_nid() does:
highmem_start = __pa(high_memory - 1) + 1;
If dma_contiguous_reserve_area() (or any other CMA declaration) is
called before free_area_init(), high_memory is uninitialized. Without
CONFIG_DEBUG_VIRTUAL, it will likely work but use the wrong value for
highmem_start.
The issue occurs because commit e120d1bc12da ("arch, mm: set high_memory
in free_area_init()") moved initialization of high_memory after the call
to dma_contiguous_reserve() -> __cma_declare_contiguous_nid() on several
architectures.
In the case CONFIG_HIGHMEM is enabled, some architectures that actually
support HIGHMEM (arm, powerpc and x86) have initialization of high_memory
before a possible call to __cma_declare_contiguous_nid() and some
initialized high_memory late anyway (arc, csky, microblase, mips, sparc,
xtensa) even before the commit e120d1bc12da so they are fine with using
uninitialized value of high_memory.
And in the case CONFIG_HIGHMEM is disabled high_memory essentially becomes
the first address after memory end, so instead of relying on high_memory
to calculate highmem_start use memblock_end_of_DRAM() and eliminate the
dependency of CMA area creation on high_memory in majority of
configurations.
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20250519171805.1288393-1-rppt@kernel.org
Fixes: e120d1bc12da ("arch, mm: set high_memory in free_area_init()")
Signed-off-by: Mike Rapoport (Microsoft) <rppt@kernel.org>
Reported-by: Pratyush Yadav <ptyadav@amazon.de>
Tested-by: Pratyush Yadav <ptyadav@amazon.de>
Tested-by: Alexandre Ghiti <alexghiti@rivosinc.com>
Reviewed-by: Oscar Salvador <osalvador@suse.de>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
---
mm/cma.c | 5 ++++-
1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
--- a/mm/cma.c~mm-cma-make-detection-of-highmem_start-more-robust
+++ a/mm/cma.c
@@ -608,7 +608,10 @@ static int __init __cma_declare_contiguo
* complain. Find the boundary by adding one to the last valid
* address.
*/
- highmem_start = __pa(high_memory - 1) + 1;
+ if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_HIGHMEM))
+ highmem_start = __pa(high_memory - 1) + 1;
+ else
+ highmem_start = memblock_end_of_DRAM();
pr_debug("%s(size %pa, base %pa, limit %pa alignment %pa)\n",
__func__, &size, &base, &limit, &alignment);
_
Patches currently in -mm which might be from rppt@kernel.org are
reply other threads:[~2025-05-25 7:54 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: [no followups] expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20250525075420.8206BC4CEEA@smtp.kernel.org \
--to=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=alexghiti@rivosinc.com \
--cc=mm-commits@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=osalvador@suse.de \
--cc=ptyadav@amazon.de \
--cc=rppt@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.