Re: [v1 03/10] bus/dpaa: enhance DPAA SoC version

[Stephen Hemminger <stephen@networkplumber.org>]

On Wed, 28 May 2025 16:09:27 +0530
vanshika.shukla@nxp.com wrote:

> +	if (s_rte_dpaa_bus.bus.conf.scan_mode != RTE_BUS_SCAN_ALLOWLIST)
> +		probe_all = true;
> +
> +	svr_file = fopen(DPAA_SOC_ID_FILE, "r");
> +	if (svr_file) {
> +		if (fscanf(svr_file, "svr:%x", &svr_ver) > 0)
> +			s_rte_dpaa_bus.svr_ver = svr_ver & DPAA_SVR_MASK;
> +		else
> +			s_rte_dpaa_bus.svr_ver = 0;
> +		fclose(svr_file);
> +	} else {
> +		s_rte_dpaa_bus.svr_ver = 0;
> +	}
> +	if (s_rte_dpaa_bus.svr_ver == SVR_LS1046A_FAMILY) {
> +		DPAA_BUS_LOG(NOTICE, "This is LS1046A family SoC.");
> +	} else if (s_rte_dpaa_bus.svr_ver == SVR_LS1043A_FAMILY) {
> +		DPAA_BUS_LOG(NOTICE, "This is LS1043A family SoC.");

Should be INFO not NOTICE, this is normal condition.