From: "Thomas Hellström" <thomas.hellstrom@linux.intel.com>
To: intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org
Cc: "Thomas Hellström" <thomas.hellstrom@linux.intel.com>,
"Matthew Brost" <matthew.brost@intel.com>
Subject: [PATCH v3] drm/xe: Rework eviction rejection of bound external bos
Date: Wed, 28 May 2025 18:41:05 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20250528164105.234718-1-thomas.hellstrom@linux.intel.com> (raw)
For preempt_fence mode VM's we're rejecting eviction of
shared bos during VM_BIND. However, since we do this in the
move() callback, we're getting an eviction failure warning from
TTM. The TTM callback intended for these things is
eviction_valuable().
However, the latter doesn't pass in the struct ttm_operation_ctx
needed to determine whether the caller needs this.
Instead, attach the needed information to the vm under the
vm->resv, until we've been able to update TTM to provide the
needed information. And add sufficient lockdep checks to prevent
misuse and races.
v2:
- Fix a copy-paste error in xe_vm_clear_validating()
v3:
- Fix kerneldoc errors.
Signed-off-by: Thomas Hellström <thomas.hellstrom@linux.intel.com>
Fixes: 0af944f0e308 ("drm/xe: Reject BO eviction if BO is bound to current VM")
Reviewed-by: Matthew Brost <matthew.brost@intel.com>
---
drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_bo.c | 46 ++++++++++++---------
drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_vm.h | 69 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_vm_types.h | 8 ++++
3 files changed, 105 insertions(+), 18 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_bo.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_bo.c
index d99d91fe8aa9..3c48a8c5f439 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_bo.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_bo.c
@@ -841,21 +841,6 @@ static int xe_bo_move(struct ttm_buffer_object *ttm_bo, bool evict,
goto out;
}
- /* Reject BO eviction if BO is bound to current VM. */
- if (evict && ctx->resv) {
- struct drm_gpuvm_bo *vm_bo;
-
- drm_gem_for_each_gpuvm_bo(vm_bo, &bo->ttm.base) {
- struct xe_vm *vm = gpuvm_to_vm(vm_bo->vm);
-
- if (xe_vm_resv(vm) == ctx->resv &&
- xe_vm_in_preempt_fence_mode(vm)) {
- ret = -EBUSY;
- goto out;
- }
- }
- }
-
/*
* Failed multi-hop where the old_mem is still marked as
* TTM_PL_FLAG_TEMPORARY, should just be a dummy move.
@@ -1013,6 +998,25 @@ static long xe_bo_shrink_purge(struct ttm_operation_ctx *ctx,
return lret;
}
+static bool
+xe_bo_eviction_valuable(struct ttm_buffer_object *bo, const struct ttm_place *place)
+{
+ struct drm_gpuvm_bo *vm_bo;
+
+ if (!ttm_bo_eviction_valuable(bo, place))
+ return false;
+
+ if (!xe_bo_is_xe_bo(bo))
+ return true;
+
+ drm_gem_for_each_gpuvm_bo(vm_bo, &bo->base) {
+ if (xe_vm_is_validating(gpuvm_to_vm(vm_bo->vm)))
+ return false;
+ }
+
+ return true;
+}
+
/**
* xe_bo_shrink() - Try to shrink an xe bo.
* @ctx: The struct ttm_operation_ctx used for shrinking.
@@ -1047,7 +1051,7 @@ long xe_bo_shrink(struct ttm_operation_ctx *ctx, struct ttm_buffer_object *bo,
(flags.purge && !xe_tt->purgeable))
return -EBUSY;
- if (!ttm_bo_eviction_valuable(bo, &place))
+ if (!xe_bo_eviction_valuable(bo, &place))
return -EBUSY;
if (!xe_bo_is_xe_bo(bo) || !xe_bo_get_unless_zero(xe_bo))
@@ -1588,7 +1592,7 @@ const struct ttm_device_funcs xe_ttm_funcs = {
.io_mem_pfn = xe_ttm_io_mem_pfn,
.access_memory = xe_ttm_access_memory,
.release_notify = xe_ttm_bo_release_notify,
- .eviction_valuable = ttm_bo_eviction_valuable,
+ .eviction_valuable = xe_bo_eviction_valuable,
.delete_mem_notify = xe_ttm_bo_delete_mem_notify,
.swap_notify = xe_ttm_bo_swap_notify,
};
@@ -2431,6 +2435,8 @@ int xe_bo_validate(struct xe_bo *bo, struct xe_vm *vm, bool allow_res_evict)
.no_wait_gpu = false,
.gfp_retry_mayfail = true,
};
+ struct pin_cookie cookie;
+ int ret;
if (vm) {
lockdep_assert_held(&vm->lock);
@@ -2440,8 +2446,12 @@ int xe_bo_validate(struct xe_bo *bo, struct xe_vm *vm, bool allow_res_evict)
ctx.resv = xe_vm_resv(vm);
}
+ cookie = xe_vm_set_validating(vm, allow_res_evict);
trace_xe_bo_validate(bo);
- return ttm_bo_validate(&bo->ttm, &bo->placement, &ctx);
+ ret = ttm_bo_validate(&bo->ttm, &bo->placement, &ctx);
+ xe_vm_clear_validating(vm, allow_res_evict, cookie);
+
+ return ret;
}
bool xe_bo_is_xe_bo(struct ttm_buffer_object *bo)
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_vm.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_vm.h
index 99e164852f63..88d6c0ef89c7 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_vm.h
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_vm.h
@@ -303,6 +303,75 @@ void xe_vm_snapshot_capture_delayed(struct xe_vm_snapshot *snap);
void xe_vm_snapshot_print(struct xe_vm_snapshot *snap, struct drm_printer *p);
void xe_vm_snapshot_free(struct xe_vm_snapshot *snap);
+/**
+ * xe_vm_set_validating() - Register this task as currently making bos resident
+ * @allow_res_evict: Allow eviction of buffer objects bound to @vm when
+ * validating.
+ * @vm: Pointer to the vm or NULL.
+ *
+ * Register this task as currently making bos resident for the vm. Intended
+ * to avoid eviction by the same task of shared bos bound to the vm.
+ * Call with the vm's resv lock held.
+ *
+ * Return: A pin cookie that should be used for xe_vm_clear_validating().
+ */
+static inline struct pin_cookie xe_vm_set_validating(struct xe_vm *vm,
+ bool allow_res_evict)
+{
+ struct pin_cookie cookie = {};
+
+ if (vm && !allow_res_evict) {
+ xe_vm_assert_held(vm);
+ cookie = lockdep_pin_lock(&xe_vm_resv(vm)->lock.base);
+ /* Pairs with READ_ONCE in xe_vm_is_validating() */
+ WRITE_ONCE(vm->validating, current);
+ }
+
+ return cookie;
+}
+
+/**
+ * xe_vm_clear_validating() - Unregister this task as currently making bos resident
+ * @vm: Pointer to the vm or NULL
+ * @allow_res_evict: Eviction from @vm was allowed. Must be set to the same
+ * value as for xe_vm_set_validation().
+ * @cookie: Cookie obtained from xe_vm_set_validating().
+ *
+ * Register this task as currently making bos resident for the vm. Intended
+ * to avoid eviction by the same task of shared bos bound to the vm.
+ * Call with the vm's resv lock held.
+ */
+static inline void xe_vm_clear_validating(struct xe_vm *vm, bool allow_res_evict,
+ struct pin_cookie cookie)
+{
+ if (vm && !allow_res_evict) {
+ lockdep_unpin_lock(&xe_vm_resv(vm)->lock.base, cookie);
+ /* Pairs with READ_ONCE in xe_vm_is_validating() */
+ WRITE_ONCE(vm->validating, NULL);
+ }
+}
+
+/**
+ * xe_vm_is_validating() - Whether bos bound to the vm are currently being made resident
+ * by the current task.
+ * @vm: Pointer to the vm.
+ *
+ * If this function returns %true, we should be in a vm resv locked region, since
+ * the current process is the same task that called xe_vm_set_validating().
+ * The function asserts that that's indeed the case.
+ *
+ * Return: %true if the task is currently making bos resident, %false otherwise.
+ */
+static inline bool xe_vm_is_validating(struct xe_vm *vm)
+{
+ /* Pairs with WRITE_ONCE in xe_vm_is_validating() */
+ if (READ_ONCE(vm->validating) == current) {
+ xe_vm_assert_held(vm);
+ return true;
+ }
+ return false;
+}
+
#if IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_DRM_XE_USERPTR_INVAL_INJECT)
void xe_vma_userptr_force_invalidate(struct xe_userptr_vma *uvma);
#else
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_vm_types.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_vm_types.h
index bfc145baad49..0e1318a15c9e 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_vm_types.h
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_vm_types.h
@@ -310,6 +310,14 @@ struct xe_vm {
* protected by the vm resv.
*/
u64 tlb_flush_seqno;
+ /**
+ * @validating: The task that is currently making bos resident for this vm.
+ * Protected by the VM's resv for writing. Opportunistic reading can be done
+ * using READ_ONCE. Note: This is a workaround for the
+ * TTM eviction_valuable() callback not being passed a struct
+ * ttm_operation_context(). Future work might want to address this.
+ */
+ struct task_struct *validating;
/** @batch_invalidate_tlb: Always invalidate TLB before batch start */
bool batch_invalidate_tlb;
/** @xef: XE file handle for tracking this VM's drm client */
--
2.49.0
next reply other threads:[~2025-05-28 16:41 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-05-28 16:41 Thomas Hellström [this message]
2025-05-28 17:20 ` ✓ CI.Patch_applied: success for drm/xe: Rework eviction rejection of bound external bos (rev3) Patchwork
2025-05-28 17:20 ` ✓ CI.checkpatch: " Patchwork
2025-05-28 17:22 ` ✓ CI.KUnit: " Patchwork
2025-05-28 17:32 ` ✓ CI.Build: " Patchwork
2025-05-28 17:34 ` ✓ CI.Hooks: " Patchwork
2025-05-28 17:36 ` ✓ CI.checksparse: " Patchwork
2025-05-28 18:04 ` ✓ Xe.CI.BAT: " Patchwork
2025-05-28 19:56 ` ✓ Xe.CI.Full: " Patchwork
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20250528164105.234718-1-thomas.hellstrom@linux.intel.com \
--to=thomas.hellstrom@linux.intel.com \
--cc=intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=matthew.brost@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.