From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from bombadil.infradead.org (bombadil.infradead.org [198.137.202.133]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id ADAD0C5AD49 for ; Fri, 30 May 2025 17:02:43 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=lists.infradead.org; s=bombadil.20210309; h=Sender:List-Subscribe:List-Help :List-Post:List-Archive:List-Unsubscribe:List-Id:In-Reply-To: Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-Type:MIME-Version:References:Message-ID: Subject:Cc:To:From:Date:Reply-To:Content-ID:Content-Description:Resent-Date: Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID:List-Owner; bh=NSFyTYUgxQ9ulN36hABpmpERB1KVLKjF7DW8D0u3oMo=; b=R0gwYBUNyWi6//eCyiqCLl9oP0 i7r05ahAEIon1dJxOzwqoyhu3jfpTK/Kon6K2eHeLZaF8uOItwDy/UuQ0zXUH/EdE3WvJaHp0VBi6 V5emtYIp1oMbmcTzbsrxnyvkAXvNhWt5EXRY6qHl8Kh1miztHdhqr7WDiiq8UA3Jwl4L2GE2z/Arx bNMupWaCV70iuzUisQ0jOFYoqRZ/eoPKh3hiXtDOAELdNEhOzxqKeH7LSBBzVt9xf+E2sspCMlpDN WlowuUYS2HdrcX8IZyQZPHNZ6UxPm6giD4xThEBJqDulCVFou6tywVhvNz5gx6e/RcRsXnA/2xdR3 rP/yeHUw==; Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=bombadil.infradead.org) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 4.98.2 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1uL37t-00000001JdH-2aLa; Fri, 30 May 2025 17:02:37 +0000 Received: from dfw.source.kernel.org ([2604:1380:4641:c500::1]) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtps (Exim 4.98.2 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1uL2qT-00000001Dth-0CGz for linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org; Fri, 30 May 2025 16:44:38 +0000 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (transwarp.subspace.kernel.org [100.75.92.58]) by dfw.source.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 968A15C583B; Fri, 30 May 2025 16:42:18 +0000 (UTC) Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 12162C4CEE9; Fri, 30 May 2025 16:44:33 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=k20201202; t=1748623475; bh=W5OpwwUyJIIM5VqI45VotpF5enCBTC5BSFX/2o6LIuo=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:From; b=E1LkJqF7WWdLxXgE6GXThQxaANeHlK2/YO+4RzDNtgNYnx3C+q6JJV6xO6BzxkDSr rbmBm6Ds4EnWVMylvEy66N0V/cah6rL98swZNnty9fnd/nAQyNoZdWzLRq7ZhsHj7O iXGOS0Pksrut4PgAlL2LECTnwUo6Q18qZdqUQJs3M9EBEkhH6NMc3JGZRYuQaTAQvz n6mKpG3oShMiwwAMwUmrx/u4jqh9h1+nJkeFbXqK4hbvA8ieGj4U7cfguADG8B5u6z LizuhbySsVIo8dDXJk7wJvkNCQ0vHVy9Y4KQgcrsLLhNXgPrGmDWRFTKAwa5qMTsQw 5ayriPv8tcAhw== Date: Fri, 30 May 2025 17:44:31 +0100 From: Lee Jones To: Stephen Rothwell Cc: Arnd Bergmann , ARM , Linux Kernel Mailing List , Linux Next Mailing List Subject: Re: linux-next: duplicate patch in the mfd tree Message-ID: <20250530164431.GB7758@google.com> References: <20250526140400.54ac8a6c@canb.auug.org.au> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit In-Reply-To: <20250526140400.54ac8a6c@canb.auug.org.au> X-CRM114-Version: 20100106-BlameMichelson ( TRE 0.8.0 (BSD) ) MR-646709E3 X-CRM114-CacheID: sfid-20250530_094437_129638_2A4FA3B8 X-CRM114-Status: GOOD ( 12.32 ) X-BeenThere: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.34 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: "linux-arm-kernel" Errors-To: linux-arm-kernel-bounces+linux-arm-kernel=archiver.kernel.org@lists.infradead.org On Mon, 26 May 2025, Stephen Rothwell wrote: > Hi all, > > The following commit is also in the arm-soc tree as a different commit > (but the same patch): > > 0ffcf5f1e41c ("dt-bindings: mfd: qcom,tcsr: Add compatible for ipq5018") > > This is commit > > 1d2c5d5f3f44 ("dt-bindings: mfd: qcom,tcsr: Add compatible for ipq5018") > > in the arm-soc tree. Why is this patch in the arm-soc tree? -- Lee Jones [李琼斯]