From: Simon Horman <horms@kernel.org>
To: Willem de Bruijn <willemdebruijn.kernel@gmail.com>
Cc: Shiming Cheng <shiming.cheng@mediatek.com>,
willemb@google.com, edumazet@google.com, davem@davemloft.net,
kuba@kernel.org, pabeni@redhat.com, matthias.bgg@gmail.com,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org,
lena.wang@mediatek.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH net v6] net: fix udp gso skb_segment after pull from frag_list
Date: Fri, 30 May 2025 19:37:06 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20250530183706.GV1484967@horms.kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <6839a707f1b14_1003de2943b@willemb.c.googlers.com.notmuch>
On Fri, May 30, 2025 at 08:39:35AM -0400, Willem de Bruijn wrote:
> Shiming Cheng wrote:
> > Commit a1e40ac5b5e9 ("net: gso: fix udp gso fraglist segmentation after
> > pull from frag_list") detected invalid geometry in frag_list skbs and
> > redirects them from skb_segment_list to more robust skb_segment. But some
> > packets with modified geometry can also hit bugs in that code. We don't
> > know how many such cases exist. Addressing each one by one also requires
> > touching the complex skb_segment code, which risks introducing bugs for
> > other types of skbs. Instead, linearize all these packets that fail the
> > basic invariants on gso fraglist skbs. That is more robust.
> >
> > If only part of the fraglist payload is pulled into head_skb, it will
> > always cause exception when splitting skbs by skb_segment. For detailed
> > call stack information, see below.
> >
> > Valid SKB_GSO_FRAGLIST skbs
> > - consist of two or more segments
> > - the head_skb holds the protocol headers plus first gso_size
> > - one or more frag_list skbs hold exactly one segment
> > - all but the last must be gso_size
> >
> > Optional datapath hooks such as NAT and BPF (bpf_skb_pull_data) can
> > modify fraglist skbs, breaking these invariants.
> >
> > In extreme cases they pull one part of data into skb linear. For UDP,
> > this causes three payloads with lengths of (11,11,10) bytes were
> > pulled tail to become (12,10,10) bytes.
> >
> > The skbs no longer meets the above SKB_GSO_FRAGLIST conditions because
> > payload was pulled into head_skb, it needs to be linearized before pass
> > to regular skb_segment.
> >
> > skb_segment+0xcd0/0xd14
> > __udp_gso_segment+0x334/0x5f4
> > udp4_ufo_fragment+0x118/0x15c
> > inet_gso_segment+0x164/0x338
> > skb_mac_gso_segment+0xc4/0x13c
> > __skb_gso_segment+0xc4/0x124
> > validate_xmit_skb+0x9c/0x2c0
> > validate_xmit_skb_list+0x4c/0x80
> > sch_direct_xmit+0x70/0x404
> > __dev_queue_xmit+0x64c/0xe5c
> > neigh_resolve_output+0x178/0x1c4
> > ip_finish_output2+0x37c/0x47c
> > __ip_finish_output+0x194/0x240
> > ip_finish_output+0x20/0xf4
> > ip_output+0x100/0x1a0
> > NF_HOOK+0xc4/0x16c
> > ip_forward+0x314/0x32c
> > ip_rcv+0x90/0x118
> > __netif_receive_skb+0x74/0x124
> > process_backlog+0xe8/0x1a4
> > __napi_poll+0x5c/0x1f8
> > net_rx_action+0x154/0x314
> > handle_softirqs+0x154/0x4b8
> >
> > [118.376811] [C201134] rxq0_pus: [name:bug&]kernel BUG at net/core/skbuff.c:4278!
> > [118.376829] [C201134] rxq0_pus: [name:traps&]Internal error: Oops - BUG: 00000000f2000800 [#1] PREEMPT SMP
> > [118.470774] [C201134] rxq0_pus: [name:mrdump&]Kernel Offset: 0x178cc00000 from 0xffffffc008000000
> > [118.470810] [C201134] rxq0_pus: [name:mrdump&]PHYS_OFFSET: 0x40000000
> > [118.470827] [C201134] rxq0_pus: [name:mrdump&]pstate: 60400005 (nZCv daif +PAN -UAO)
> > [118.470848] [C201134] rxq0_pus: [name:mrdump&]pc : [0xffffffd79598aefc] skb_segment+0xcd0/0xd14
> > [118.470900] [C201134] rxq0_pus: [name:mrdump&]lr : [0xffffffd79598a5e8] skb_segment+0x3bc/0xd14
> > [118.470928] [C201134] rxq0_pus: [name:mrdump&]sp : ffffffc008013770
> >
> > Fixes: a1e40ac5b5e9 ("gso: fix udp gso fraglist segmentation after pull from frag_list")
> > Signed-off-by: Shiming Cheng <shiming.cheng@mediatek.com>
>
> Is this effectively a repost of v5?
>
> I think Simon suggested changing the subject line from starting with
> "net:" to starting with "gso:", but this revision does not make such
> a change.
FTR, my suggestion was to correct the subject embedded in the Fixes tag.
And that appears to be addressed in this revision (v6).
>
> Btw, for upcoming patches: it is helpful to add a changelog below the
> --- marker line, to help reviewers see what changed. See also the
> SubmittingPatches doc on that point.
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-05-30 18:37 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-05-30 1:26 [PATCH net v6] net: fix udp gso skb_segment after pull from frag_list Shiming Cheng
2025-05-30 12:39 ` Willem de Bruijn
2025-05-30 18:37 ` Simon Horman [this message]
2025-05-30 18:59 ` Willem de Bruijn
2025-06-02 11:50 ` patchwork-bot+netdevbpf
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20250530183706.GV1484967@horms.kernel.org \
--to=horms@kernel.org \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=edumazet@google.com \
--cc=kuba@kernel.org \
--cc=lena.wang@mediatek.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=matthias.bgg@gmail.com \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
--cc=shiming.cheng@mediatek.com \
--cc=willemb@google.com \
--cc=willemdebruijn.kernel@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.