From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
To: Yi Zhang <yi.zhang@redhat.com>
Cc: linux-nvme@lists.infradead.org, Keith Busch <kbusch@kernel.org>,
Jens Axboe <axboe@fb.com>, Alan Adamson <alan.adamson@oracle.com>
Subject: Re: [bug report]BUG: workqueue leaked atomic, lock or RCU: kworker/u67:3[365] observed from v6.15-rc7
Date: Mon, 2 Jun 2025 07:52:58 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20250602055258.GA22318@lst.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAHj4cs93WutyoPLFMr0JidHhRAxHC1ZDcj-RvdnX=R7OaV5ejg@mail.gmail.com>
On Thu, May 29, 2025 at 08:41:36PM +0800, Yi Zhang wrote:
> Hi
>
> My regression test found this issue from v6.15-rc7, please help check
> it and let me know if you need any infor/test for it, thanks.
Hi Zi,
The new code seems to be missing a queue_limits_cancel_update,
the patch below fies it. But what kind of devices is this?
PCIe muti-controller subsystems aren't that command, and this
looks like a grave bug, combined with the I/O page fault that
looks really odd.
diff --git a/drivers/nvme/host/core.c b/drivers/nvme/host/core.c
index f69a232a000a..4bb3c68b3451 100644
--- a/drivers/nvme/host/core.c
+++ b/drivers/nvme/host/core.c
@@ -2388,6 +2388,7 @@ static int nvme_update_ns_info_block(struct nvme_ns *ns,
* atomic write capabilities.
*/
if (lim.atomic_write_hw_max > ns->ctrl->subsys->atomic_bs) {
+ queue_limits_cancel_update(ns->disk->queue);
blk_mq_unfreeze_queue(ns->disk->queue, memflags);
ret = -ENXIO;
goto out;
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-06-02 5:53 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-05-29 12:41 [bug report]BUG: workqueue leaked atomic, lock or RCU: kworker/u67:3[365] observed from v6.15-rc7 Yi Zhang
2025-06-02 5:52 ` Christoph Hellwig [this message]
2025-06-02 7:51 ` John Garry
[not found] ` <CAHj4cs9MxW96b=a6sQOtz_DDc63uKcNX3dat-th__9D0bwRQ9g@mail.gmail.com>
2025-06-11 2:06 ` Yi Zhang
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20250602055258.GA22318@lst.de \
--to=hch@lst.de \
--cc=alan.adamson@oracle.com \
--cc=axboe@fb.com \
--cc=kbusch@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-nvme@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=yi.zhang@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.