Re: [EXTERNAL] Re: EXT4/JBD2 Not Fully Released device after unmount of NVMe-oF Block Device

["Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@mit.edu>]

On Mon, Jun 02, 2025 at 09:32:18PM +0000, Mitta Sai Chaithanya wrote:

> However, after the connection is re-established and the device is
> unmounted from all namespaces, I still observe errors from both ext4
> and jb2 when the device is especially disconnected.

How do you *know* that you've unmounted the device in all namespaces.
I seem to recall that some process (I think one of the systemd
daemons, but I could be wrong) was creating a namespace that users
were not expecting, resulting in the device staying mounted when the
users were not so expecting it.

The fact that /proc/fs/ext4/<device_name> still exists means that the
kernel (specifically, the VFS layer) doesn't think that the file
system can be shut down.  As a result, the VFS layer has not called
ext4's put_super() and kill_sb() methods.  And so yes, I/O activity
can still happen, because the file system has not been shutdown.

If you still see /proc/fs/ext4/<device_name>, my suggestion would be
grep /proc/*/mounts looking to see which processes has a namespace
which still has the device mounted.  I suspect that you will see that
there is some namespace that you weren't aware of that is keeping the
ext4 struct super object pinned and alive.

> Another point I would like to mention, I am observing JBD2 errors especially after NVMe-oF device has been disconnected and below are the logs.

Sure, but that's the effect, not the cause, of the NVME-of device
getting ripped down while the file system is still active.  Which I am
99.997% sure is because it is still mounted in some namespace.  The
other 0.003% chance is that there is some refcount problem in the VFS
subsytem, and I would suggest that you ask Microsoft's VFS experts,
(such as Christain Brauner, who is one of the VFS maintainers) to take
a look.  I very much doubt it is a kernel bug, though.

  	   	     	      	   	       - Ted