From: Philipp Stanner <phasta@kernel.org>
To: "Lyude Paul" <lyude@redhat.com>,
"Danilo Krummrich" <dakr@kernel.org>,
"David Airlie" <airlied@gmail.com>,
"Simona Vetter" <simona@ffwll.ch>,
"Matthew Brost" <matthew.brost@intel.com>,
"Philipp Stanner" <phasta@kernel.org>,
"Christian König" <ckoenig.leichtzumerken@gmail.com>,
"Maarten Lankhorst" <maarten.lankhorst@linux.intel.com>,
"Maxime Ripard" <mripard@kernel.org>,
"Thomas Zimmermann" <tzimmermann@suse.de>,
"Sumit Semwal" <sumit.semwal@linaro.org>,
"Tvrtko Ursulin" <tvrtko.ursulin@igalia.com>,
"Pierre-Eric Pelloux-Prayer" <pierre-eric.pelloux-prayer@amd.com>
Cc: dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org, nouveau@lists.freedesktop.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-media@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [RFC PATCH 6/6] drm/nouveau: Remove waitque for sched teardown
Date: Tue, 3 Jun 2025 11:31:31 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20250603093130.100159-8-phasta@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250603093130.100159-2-phasta@kernel.org>
struct nouveau_sched contains a waitque needed to prevent
drm_sched_fini() from being called while there are still jobs pending.
Doing so so far would have caused memory leaks.
With the new memleak-free mode of operation switched on in
drm_sched_fini() by providing the callback
nouveau_sched_fence_context_kill() the waitque is not necessary anymore.
Remove the waitque.
Signed-off-by: Philipp Stanner <phasta@kernel.org>
---
drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_sched.c | 20 +++++++-------------
drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_sched.h | 9 +++------
drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_uvmm.c | 8 ++++----
3 files changed, 14 insertions(+), 23 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_sched.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_sched.c
index 2ec62059c351..7d9c3418e76b 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_sched.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_sched.c
@@ -122,11 +122,9 @@ nouveau_job_done(struct nouveau_job *job)
{
struct nouveau_sched *sched = job->sched;
- spin_lock(&sched->job.list.lock);
+ spin_lock(&sched->job_list.lock);
list_del(&job->entry);
- spin_unlock(&sched->job.list.lock);
-
- wake_up(&sched->job.wq);
+ spin_unlock(&sched->job_list.lock);
}
void
@@ -307,9 +305,9 @@ nouveau_job_submit(struct nouveau_job *job)
}
/* Submit was successful; add the job to the schedulers job list. */
- spin_lock(&sched->job.list.lock);
- list_add(&job->entry, &sched->job.list.head);
- spin_unlock(&sched->job.list.lock);
+ spin_lock(&sched->job_list.lock);
+ list_add(&job->entry, &sched->job_list.head);
+ spin_unlock(&sched->job_list.lock);
drm_sched_job_arm(&job->base);
job->done_fence = dma_fence_get(&job->base.s_fence->finished);
@@ -460,9 +458,8 @@ nouveau_sched_init(struct nouveau_sched *sched, struct nouveau_drm *drm,
goto fail_sched;
mutex_init(&sched->mutex);
- spin_lock_init(&sched->job.list.lock);
- INIT_LIST_HEAD(&sched->job.list.head);
- init_waitqueue_head(&sched->job.wq);
+ spin_lock_init(&sched->job_list.lock);
+ INIT_LIST_HEAD(&sched->job_list.head);
return 0;
@@ -502,9 +499,6 @@ nouveau_sched_fini(struct nouveau_sched *sched)
struct drm_gpu_scheduler *drm_sched = &sched->base;
struct drm_sched_entity *entity = &sched->entity;
- rmb(); /* for list_empty to work without lock */
- wait_event(sched->job.wq, list_empty(&sched->job.list.head));
-
drm_sched_entity_fini(entity);
drm_sched_fini(drm_sched);
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_sched.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_sched.h
index 20cd1da8db73..b98c3f0bef30 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_sched.h
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_sched.h
@@ -103,12 +103,9 @@ struct nouveau_sched {
struct mutex mutex;
struct {
- struct {
- struct list_head head;
- spinlock_t lock;
- } list;
- struct wait_queue_head wq;
- } job;
+ struct list_head head;
+ spinlock_t lock;
+ } job_list;
};
int nouveau_sched_create(struct nouveau_sched **psched, struct nouveau_drm *drm,
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_uvmm.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_uvmm.c
index 48f105239f42..ddfc46bc1b3e 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_uvmm.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_uvmm.c
@@ -1019,8 +1019,8 @@ bind_validate_map_sparse(struct nouveau_job *job, u64 addr, u64 range)
u64 end = addr + range;
again:
- spin_lock(&sched->job.list.lock);
- list_for_each_entry(__job, &sched->job.list.head, entry) {
+ spin_lock(&sched->job_list.lock);
+ list_for_each_entry(__job, &sched->job_list.head, entry) {
struct nouveau_uvmm_bind_job *bind_job = to_uvmm_bind_job(__job);
list_for_each_op(op, &bind_job->ops) {
@@ -1030,7 +1030,7 @@ bind_validate_map_sparse(struct nouveau_job *job, u64 addr, u64 range)
if (!(end <= op_addr || addr >= op_end)) {
nouveau_uvmm_bind_job_get(bind_job);
- spin_unlock(&sched->job.list.lock);
+ spin_unlock(&sched->job_list.lock);
wait_for_completion(&bind_job->complete);
nouveau_uvmm_bind_job_put(bind_job);
goto again;
@@ -1038,7 +1038,7 @@ bind_validate_map_sparse(struct nouveau_job *job, u64 addr, u64 range)
}
}
}
- spin_unlock(&sched->job.list.lock);
+ spin_unlock(&sched->job_list.lock);
}
static int
--
2.49.0
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-06-03 9:32 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-06-03 9:31 [RFC PATCH 0/6] drm/sched: Avoid memory leaks by canceling job-by-job Philipp Stanner
2025-06-03 9:31 ` [RFC PATCH 1/6] drm/sched: Avoid memory leaks with cancel_job() callback Philipp Stanner
2025-06-03 13:22 ` Tvrtko Ursulin
2025-06-12 14:17 ` Tvrtko Ursulin
2025-06-12 14:20 ` Philipp Stanner
2025-06-16 9:27 ` Tvrtko Ursulin
2025-06-16 10:08 ` Philipp Stanner
2025-06-03 9:31 ` [RFC PATCH 2/6] drm/sched/tests: Implement cancel_job() Philipp Stanner
2025-06-03 9:31 ` [RFC PATCH 3/6] drm/sched: Warn if pending list is not empty Philipp Stanner
2025-06-03 9:31 ` [RFC PATCH 4/6] drm/nouveau: Make fence container helper usable driver-wide Philipp Stanner
2025-06-03 9:31 ` [RFC PATCH 5/6] drm/nouveau: Add new callback for scheduler teardown Philipp Stanner
2025-06-03 9:31 ` Philipp Stanner [this message]
2025-06-03 12:27 ` [RFC PATCH 0/6] drm/sched: Avoid memory leaks by canceling job-by-job Tvrtko Ursulin
2025-06-03 13:23 ` Philipp Stanner
2025-06-11 21:21 ` Danilo Krummrich
2025-06-12 13:46 ` Tvrtko Ursulin
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20250603093130.100159-8-phasta@kernel.org \
--to=phasta@kernel.org \
--cc=airlied@gmail.com \
--cc=ckoenig.leichtzumerken@gmail.com \
--cc=dakr@kernel.org \
--cc=dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-media@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=lyude@redhat.com \
--cc=maarten.lankhorst@linux.intel.com \
--cc=matthew.brost@intel.com \
--cc=mripard@kernel.org \
--cc=nouveau@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=pierre-eric.pelloux-prayer@amd.com \
--cc=simona@ffwll.ch \
--cc=sumit.semwal@linaro.org \
--cc=tvrtko.ursulin@igalia.com \
--cc=tzimmermann@suse.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.