From: Petr Vorel <pvorel@suse.cz>
To: Martin Doucha <mdoucha@suse.cz>
Cc: ltp@lists.linux.it
Subject: Re: [LTP] [PATCH v2 1/2] epoll_pwait: Refactor timeout to struct timespec
Date: Wed, 4 Jun 2025 08:35:21 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20250604063521.GA1094733@pevik> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250603152253.214656-2-mdoucha@suse.cz>
Hi Martin,
> Support higher precision timeout in do_epoll_pwait() by passing struct
> timespec instead of int value in milliseconds. Only one test actually
> uses the parameter.
Ah, you mean epoll_pwait03.c.
Reviewed-by: Petr Vorel <pvorel@suse.cz>
...
> +++ b/testcases/kernel/syscalls/epoll_pwait/epoll_pwait_var.h
> @@ -14,22 +14,22 @@
> #define NSEC_PER_MSEC (1000000L)
> static int do_epoll_pwait(int epfd, struct epoll_event *events, int
> - maxevents, int timeout, const sigset_t *sigmask)
> + maxevents, struct timespec *timeout, const sigset_t *sigmask)
> {
> - if (tst_variant == 0)
> - return epoll_pwait(epfd, events, maxevents, timeout, sigmask);
> + if (tst_variant == 0) {
> + int timeout_ms = -1;
very nit: I would reverse the condition to save indent for tst_variant == 0:
if (tst_variant != 0)
return epoll_pwait2(epfd, events, maxevents, timeout, sigmask);
...
Kind regards,
Petr
> - struct timespec ts;
> + if (timeout) {
> + timeout_ms = timeout->tv_sec * MSEC_PER_SEC;
> + timeout_ms += (timeout->tv_nsec + NSEC_PER_MSEC - 1) /
> + NSEC_PER_MSEC;
> + }
> - if (timeout < 0) {
> - return epoll_pwait2(epfd, events, maxevents, NULL, sigmask);
> - } else {
> - ts.tv_sec = timeout / MSEC_PER_SEC;
> - ts.tv_nsec = NSEC_PER_MSEC * (timeout % MSEC_PER_SEC);
> + return epoll_pwait(epfd, events, maxevents, timeout_ms,
> + sigmask);
> }
> - return epoll_pwait2(epfd, events, maxevents, &ts, sigmask);
> -
> + return epoll_pwait2(epfd, events, maxevents, timeout, sigmask);
> }
> static void epoll_pwait_init(void)
--
Mailing list info: https://lists.linux.it/listinfo/ltp
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-06-04 6:35 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-06-03 15:22 [LTP] [PATCH v2 0/2] epoll_pwait2() timeout regression test Martin Doucha
2025-06-03 15:22 ` [LTP] [PATCH v2 1/2] epoll_pwait: Refactor timeout to struct timespec Martin Doucha
2025-06-04 6:35 ` Petr Vorel [this message]
2025-06-04 12:10 ` Martin Doucha
2025-06-05 6:28 ` Petr Vorel
2025-06-04 7:01 ` Andrea Cervesato via ltp
2025-06-03 15:22 ` [LTP] [PATCH v2 2/2] Add regression test for epoll_pwait2() timeout Martin Doucha
2025-06-04 7:01 ` Andrea Cervesato via ltp
2025-06-04 7:29 ` Petr Vorel
2025-06-04 7:34 ` [LTP] [PATCH v2 0/2] epoll_pwait2() timeout regression test Petr Vorel
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20250604063521.GA1094733@pevik \
--to=pvorel@suse.cz \
--cc=ltp@lists.linux.it \
--cc=mdoucha@suse.cz \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.