From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
To: Leo Yan <leo.yan@arm.com>
Cc: Yeoreum Yun <yeoreum.yun@arm.com>,
mingo@redhat.com, mingo@kernel.org, acme@kernel.org,
namhyung@kernel.org, mark.rutland@arm.com,
alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com, jolsa@kernel.org,
irogers@google.com, adrian.hunter@intel.com,
kan.liang@linux.intel.com, linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, David Wang <00107082@163.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/1] perf/core: fix dangling cgroup pointer in cpuctx
Date: Wed, 4 Jun 2025 16:16:40 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20250604141640.GL38114@noisy.programming.kicks-ass.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250604101821.GC8020@e132581.arm.com>
On Wed, Jun 04, 2025 at 11:18:21AM +0100, Leo Yan wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 04, 2025 at 10:03:39AM +0200, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> > And now we have the sitation that __perf_remove_from_context() can do:
> >
> > {ACTIVE,INACTIVE,OFF,ERROR} -> {OFF,EXIT,REVOKED,DEAD}
>
> A detailed transition is:
>
> Case 1: {ACTIVE} -> {INACTIVE} -> {OFF,EXIT,REVOKED,DEAD}
It can also start with INACTIVE, but yeah..
> Case 2: {ERROR} -> {ERROR,EXIT,REVOKED,DEAD}
> Case 3: {OFF} -> {OFF,EXIT,REVOKED,DEAD}
>
> > Where the {OFF,ERROR} -> * transition already have
> > perf_cgroup_event_disable(), but the {ACTIVE,INACTIVE} -> * part has
> > not.
>
> Just a minor concern.
>
> I noticed perf_put_aux_event() sets the ERROR state for sibling events
> of an AUX event.
There is also perf_remove_sibling_event(), which can cause ERROR.
> IIUC, the AUX event is the group leader, so we only
> need to clean up the cgroup pointer for the AUX event, and simply set
> the ERROR state for its sibling events, correct?
Not sure; I forever forget how the AUX events are supposed to work :-/
It might be prudent to do something like so:
diff --git a/kernel/events/core.c b/kernel/events/core.c
index f34c99f8ce8f..e6583747838a 100644
--- a/kernel/events/core.c
+++ b/kernel/events/core.c
@@ -2149,8 +2149,9 @@ perf_aux_output_match(struct perf_event *event, struct perf_event *aux_event)
}
static void put_event(struct perf_event *event);
-static void event_sched_out(struct perf_event *event,
- struct perf_event_context *ctx);
+static void __event_disable(struct perf_event *event,
+ struct perf_event_context *ctx,
+ enum perf_event_state state);
static void perf_put_aux_event(struct perf_event *event)
{
@@ -2183,8 +2184,7 @@ static void perf_put_aux_event(struct perf_event *event)
* state so that we don't try to schedule it again. Note
* that perf_event_enable() will clear the ERROR status.
*/
- event_sched_out(iter, ctx);
- perf_event_set_state(event, PERF_EVENT_STATE_ERROR);
+ __event_disable(event, ctx, PERF_EVENT_STATE_ERROR);
}
}
@@ -2242,18 +2242,6 @@ static inline struct list_head *get_event_list(struct perf_event *event)
&event->pmu_ctx->flexible_active;
}
-/*
- * Events that have PERF_EV_CAP_SIBLING require being part of a group and
- * cannot exist on their own, schedule them out and move them into the ERROR
- * state. Also see _perf_event_enable(), it will not be able to recover
- * this ERROR state.
- */
-static inline void perf_remove_sibling_event(struct perf_event *event)
-{
- event_sched_out(event, event->ctx);
- perf_event_set_state(event, PERF_EVENT_STATE_ERROR);
-}
-
static void perf_group_detach(struct perf_event *event)
{
struct perf_event *leader = event->group_leader;
@@ -2289,8 +2277,15 @@ static void perf_group_detach(struct perf_event *event)
*/
list_for_each_entry_safe(sibling, tmp, &event->sibling_list, sibling_list) {
+ /*
+ * Events that have PERF_EV_CAP_SIBLING require being part of
+ * a group and cannot exist on their own, schedule them out
+ * and move them into the ERROR state. Also see
+ * _perf_event_enable(), it will not be able to recover this
+ * ERROR state.
+ */
if (sibling->event_caps & PERF_EV_CAP_SIBLING)
- perf_remove_sibling_event(sibling);
+ __event_disable(sibling, ctx, PERF_EVENT_STATE_ERROR);
sibling->group_leader = sibling;
list_del_init(&sibling->sibling_list);
@@ -2562,6 +2557,19 @@ static void perf_remove_from_context(struct perf_event *event, unsigned long fla
event_function_call(event, __perf_remove_from_context, (void *)flags);
}
+static void __event_disable(struct perf_event *event,
+ struct perf_event_context *ctx,
+ enum perf_event_state state)
+{
+ if (event == event->group_leader)
+ group_sched_out(event, ctx);
+ else
+ event_sched_out(event, ctx);
+
+ perf_event_set_state(event, state);
+ perf_cgroup_event_disable(event, ctx);
+}
+
/*
* Cross CPU call to disable a performance event
*/
@@ -2575,15 +2583,7 @@ static void __perf_event_disable(struct perf_event *event,
perf_pmu_disable(event->pmu_ctx->pmu);
ctx_time_update_event(ctx, event);
-
- if (event == event->group_leader)
- group_sched_out(event, ctx);
- else
- event_sched_out(event, ctx);
-
- perf_event_set_state(event, PERF_EVENT_STATE_OFF);
- perf_cgroup_event_disable(event, ctx);
-
+ __event_disable(event, ctx, PERF_EVENT_STATE_OFF);
perf_pmu_enable(event->pmu_ctx->pmu);
}
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-06-04 14:16 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 37+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-06-02 18:40 [PATCH 1/1] perf/core: fix dangling cgroup pointer in cpuctx Yeoreum Yun
2025-06-03 2:01 ` David Wang
2025-06-03 4:46 ` [PATCH " Yeoreum Yun
2025-06-03 5:44 ` David Wang
2025-06-03 6:34 ` Yeoreum Yun
2025-06-03 6:39 ` Yeoreum Yun
2025-06-03 6:47 ` David Wang
2025-06-03 6:42 ` David Wang
2025-06-03 7:16 ` Yeoreum Yun
2025-06-03 7:31 ` David Wang
2025-06-03 8:15 ` David Wang
2025-06-03 6:54 ` David Wang
2025-06-03 9:20 ` Yeoreum Yun
2025-06-03 10:08 ` David Wang
2025-06-03 13:41 ` Yeoreum Yun
2025-06-03 14:02 ` David Wang
2025-06-03 14:00 ` Leo Yan
2025-06-03 14:44 ` Peter Zijlstra
2025-06-03 15:17 ` Yeoreum Yun
2025-06-04 7:06 ` Peter Zijlstra
2025-06-04 8:03 ` Peter Zijlstra
2025-06-04 10:06 ` Yeoreum Yun
2025-06-04 12:37 ` Peter Zijlstra
2025-06-04 12:54 ` Yeoreum Yun
2025-06-04 10:18 ` Leo Yan
2025-06-04 13:58 ` Peter Zijlstra
2025-06-04 15:17 ` Leo Yan
2025-06-11 9:29 ` [tip: perf/urgent] perf: Add comment to enum perf_event_state tip-bot2 for Peter Zijlstra
2025-06-04 14:16 ` Peter Zijlstra [this message]
2025-06-04 15:46 ` [PATCH 1/1] perf/core: fix dangling cgroup pointer in cpuctx Leo Yan
2025-06-04 15:59 ` Peter Zijlstra
2025-06-05 11:29 ` Peter Zijlstra
2025-06-05 12:33 ` Peter Zijlstra
2025-06-05 17:21 ` Leo Yan
2025-06-11 9:29 ` [tip: perf/urgent] perf: Fix cgroup state vs ERROR tip-bot2 for Peter Zijlstra
2025-06-05 11:41 ` [PATCH 1/1] perf/core: fix dangling cgroup pointer in cpuctx Peter Zijlstra
2025-06-03 15:05 ` Yeoreum Yun
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20250604141640.GL38114@noisy.programming.kicks-ass.net \
--to=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=00107082@163.com \
--cc=acme@kernel.org \
--cc=adrian.hunter@intel.com \
--cc=alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com \
--cc=irogers@google.com \
--cc=jolsa@kernel.org \
--cc=kan.liang@linux.intel.com \
--cc=leo.yan@arm.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mark.rutland@arm.com \
--cc=mingo@kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=namhyung@kernel.org \
--cc=yeoreum.yun@arm.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.