From: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>
To: Johannes Thumshirn <jth@kernel.org>, linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org
Cc: oe-kbuild-all@lists.linux.dev,
Naohiro Aota <naohiro.aota@wdc.com>,
Damien Le Moal <dlemoal@kernel.org>,
David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>,
Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com>,
Johannes Thumshirn <johannes.thumshirn@wdc.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] btrfs: zoned: fix alloc_offset calculation for partly conventional block groups
Date: Fri, 6 Jun 2025 08:06:02 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <202506060751.KRci5LHx-lkp@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250605091811.386815-1-jth@kernel.org>
Hi Johannes,
kernel test robot noticed the following build errors:
[auto build test ERROR on kdave/for-next]
[also build test ERROR on linus/master v6.15 next-20250605]
[If your patch is applied to the wrong git tree, kindly drop us a note.
And when submitting patch, we suggest to use '--base' as documented in
https://git-scm.com/docs/git-format-patch#_base_tree_information]
url: https://github.com/intel-lab-lkp/linux/commits/Johannes-Thumshirn/btrfs-zoned-fix-alloc_offset-calculation-for-partly-conventional-block-groups/20250605-171925
base: https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/kdave/linux.git for-next
patch link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20250605091811.386815-1-jth%40kernel.org
patch subject: [PATCH v2] btrfs: zoned: fix alloc_offset calculation for partly conventional block groups
config: i386-buildonly-randconfig-002-20250606 (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20250606/202506060751.KRci5LHx-lkp@intel.com/config)
compiler: gcc-12 (Debian 12.2.0-14) 12.2.0
reproduce (this is a W=1 build): (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20250606/202506060751.KRci5LHx-lkp@intel.com/reproduce)
If you fix the issue in a separate patch/commit (i.e. not just a new version of
the same patch/commit), kindly add following tags
| Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>
| Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/oe-kbuild-all/202506060751.KRci5LHx-lkp@intel.com/
All errors (new ones prefixed by >>):
ld: fs/btrfs/zoned.o: in function `btrfs_load_block_group_raid0':
>> fs/btrfs/zoned.c:1531: undefined reference to `__umoddi3'
ld: fs/btrfs/zoned.o: in function `btrfs_load_block_group_raid10':
fs/btrfs/zoned.c:1592: undefined reference to `__umoddi3'
vim +1531 fs/btrfs/zoned.c
1504
1505 static int btrfs_load_block_group_raid0(struct btrfs_block_group *bg,
1506 struct btrfs_chunk_map *map,
1507 struct zone_info *zone_info,
1508 unsigned long *active,
1509 u64 last_alloc)
1510 {
1511 struct btrfs_fs_info *fs_info = bg->fs_info;
1512
1513 if ((map->type & BTRFS_BLOCK_GROUP_DATA) && !fs_info->stripe_root) {
1514 btrfs_err(fs_info, "zoned: data %s needs raid-stripe-tree",
1515 btrfs_bg_type_to_raid_name(map->type));
1516 return -EINVAL;
1517 }
1518
1519 for (int i = 0; i < map->num_stripes; i++) {
1520 if (zone_info[i].alloc_offset == WP_MISSING_DEV)
1521 continue;
1522
1523 if (zone_info[i].alloc_offset == WP_CONVENTIONAL) {
1524 u64 stripe_nr, full_stripe_nr;
1525 u64 stripe_offset;
1526 int stripe_index;
1527
1528 stripe_nr = div64_u64(last_alloc, map->stripe_size);
1529 stripe_offset = stripe_nr * map->stripe_size;
1530 full_stripe_nr = div_u64(stripe_nr, map->num_stripes);
> 1531 stripe_index = stripe_nr % map->num_stripes;
1532
1533 zone_info[i].alloc_offset =
1534 full_stripe_nr * map->stripe_size;
1535
1536 if (stripe_index > i)
1537 zone_info[i].alloc_offset += map->stripe_size;
1538 else if (stripe_index == i)
1539 zone_info[i].alloc_offset +=
1540 (last_alloc - stripe_offset);
1541 }
1542
1543 if (test_bit(0, active) != test_bit(i, active)) {
1544 if (!btrfs_zone_activate(bg))
1545 return -EIO;
1546 } else {
1547 if (test_bit(0, active))
1548 set_bit(BLOCK_GROUP_FLAG_ZONE_IS_ACTIVE, &bg->runtime_flags);
1549 }
1550 bg->zone_capacity += zone_info[i].capacity;
1551 bg->alloc_offset += zone_info[i].alloc_offset;
1552 }
1553
1554 return 0;
1555 }
1556
--
0-DAY CI Kernel Test Service
https://github.com/intel/lkp-tests/wiki
prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-06-06 0:06 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-06-05 9:18 [PATCH v2] btrfs: zoned: fix alloc_offset calculation for partly conventional block groups Johannes Thumshirn
2025-06-06 0:06 ` kernel test robot [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=202506060751.KRci5LHx-lkp@intel.com \
--to=lkp@intel.com \
--cc=dlemoal@kernel.org \
--cc=dsterba@suse.com \
--cc=johannes.thumshirn@wdc.com \
--cc=josef@toxicpanda.com \
--cc=jth@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=naohiro.aota@wdc.com \
--cc=oe-kbuild-all@lists.linux.dev \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.