From: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
To: stable@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Pu Lehui <pulehui@huaweicloud.com>, Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 5.15 6/9] arm64: spectre: increase parameters that can be used to turn off bhb mitigation individually
Date: Sun, 8 Jun 2025 22:34:26 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20250608163029-e6a3c61f2f4dad77@stable.kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250607153535.3613861-7-pulehui@huaweicloud.com>
[ Sasha's backport helper bot ]
Hi,
✅ All tests passed successfully. No issues detected.
No action required from the submitter.
The upstream commit SHA1 provided is correct: 877ace9eab7de032f954533afd5d1ecd0cf62eaf
WARNING: Author mismatch between patch and upstream commit:
Backport author: Pu Lehui<pulehui@huaweicloud.com>
Commit author: Liu Song<liusong@linux.alibaba.com>
Status in newer kernel trees:
6.15.y | Present (exact SHA1)
6.14.y | Present (exact SHA1)
6.12.y | Present (exact SHA1)
6.6.y | Present (exact SHA1)
6.1.y | Present (exact SHA1)
Note: The patch differs from the upstream commit:
---
1: 877ace9eab7de ! 1: 8c7e23e93b2d7 arm64: spectre: increase parameters that can be used to turn off bhb mitigation individually
@@ Metadata
## Commit message ##
arm64: spectre: increase parameters that can be used to turn off bhb mitigation individually
+ [ Upstream commit 877ace9eab7de032f954533afd5d1ecd0cf62eaf ]
+
In our environment, it was found that the mitigation BHB has a great
impact on the benchmark performance. For example, in the lmbench test,
the "process fork && exit" test performance drops by 20%.
@@ Commit message
Acked-by: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/1661514050-22263-1-git-send-email-liusong@linux.alibaba.com
Signed-off-by: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
+ Signed-off-by: Pu Lehui <pulehui@huawei.com>
## Documentation/admin-guide/kernel-parameters.txt ##
@@
+ spectre_bhi=off [X86]
spectre_v2_user=off [X86]
- spec_store_bypass_disable=off [X86,PPC]
ssbd=force-off [ARM64]
+ nospectre_bhb [ARM64]
- l1tf=off [X86]
- mds=off [X86]
tsx_async_abort=off [X86]
+
+ Exceptions:
@@
vulnerability. System may allow data leaks with this
option.
---
Results of testing on various branches:
| Branch | Patch Apply | Build Test |
|---------------------------|-------------|------------|
| stable/linux-6.1.y | Success | Success |
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-06-09 2:34 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-06-07 15:35 [PATCH 5.15 0/9] backport for CVE-2025-37948 and CVE-2025-37963 Pu Lehui
2025-06-07 15:35 ` [PATCH 5.15 1/9] arm64: move AARCH64_BREAK_FAULT into insn-def.h Pu Lehui
2025-06-09 2:34 ` Sasha Levin
2025-06-07 15:35 ` [PATCH 5.15 2/9] arm64: insn: add encoders for atomic operations Pu Lehui
2025-06-09 2:34 ` Sasha Levin
2025-06-07 15:35 ` [PATCH 5.15 3/9] arm64: insn: Add support for encoding DSB Pu Lehui
2025-06-09 2:34 ` Sasha Levin
2025-06-07 15:35 ` [PATCH 5.15 4/9] arm64: proton-pack: Expose whether the platform is mitigated by firmware Pu Lehui
2025-06-09 2:34 ` Sasha Levin
2025-06-07 15:35 ` [PATCH 5.15 5/9] arm64: proton-pack: Expose whether the branchy loop k value Pu Lehui
2025-06-09 2:34 ` Sasha Levin
2025-06-07 15:35 ` [PATCH 5.15 6/9] arm64: spectre: increase parameters that can be used to turn off bhb mitigation individually Pu Lehui
2025-06-09 2:34 ` Sasha Levin [this message]
2025-06-07 15:35 ` [PATCH 5.15 7/9] arm64: bpf: Add BHB mitigation to the epilogue for cBPF programs Pu Lehui
2025-06-09 2:34 ` Sasha Levin
2025-06-07 15:35 ` [PATCH 5.15 8/9] arm64: bpf: Only mitigate cBPF programs loaded by unprivileged users Pu Lehui
2025-06-09 2:34 ` Sasha Levin
2025-06-07 15:35 ` [PATCH 5.15 9/9] arm64: proton-pack: Add new CPUs 'k' values for branch mitigation Pu Lehui
2025-06-09 2:34 ` Sasha Levin
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20250608163029-e6a3c61f2f4dad77@stable.kernel.org \
--to=sashal@kernel.org \
--cc=pulehui@huaweicloud.com \
--cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.