All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: John Fastabend <john.fastabend@gmail.com>
To: Jiayuan Chen <jiayuan.chen@linux.dev>
Cc: bpf@vger.kernel.org, Jakub Sitnicki <jakub@cloudflare.com>,
	"David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
	Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>,
	Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>, Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com>,
	Simon Horman <horms@kernel.org>,
	Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>,
	Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>,
	netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH bpf-next v2] bpf, sockmap: Fix psock incorrectly pointing to sk
Date: Sun, 8 Jun 2025 21:20:24 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20250609042024.ta4fuiogxxklolst@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250609025908.79331-1-jiayuan.chen@linux.dev>

On 2025-06-09 10:59:08, Jiayuan Chen wrote:
> We observed an issue from the latest selftest: sockmap_redir where
> sk_psock(psock->sk) != psock in the backlog. The root cause is the special
> behavior in sockmap_redir - it frequently performs map_update() and
> map_delete() on the same socket. During map_update(), we create a new
> psock and during map_delete(), we eventually free the psock via rcu_work
> in sk_psock_drop(). However, pending workqueues might still exist and not
> be processed yet. If users immediately perform another map_update(), a new
> psock will be allocated for the same sk, resulting in two psocks pointing
> to the same sk.
> 
> When the pending workqueue is later triggered, it uses the old psock to
> access sk for I/O operations, which is incorrect.

[...]

> 
> Note: We cannot call cancel_delayed_work_sync() in map_delete() since this
> might be invoked in BPF context by BPF helper, and the function may sleep.
> 
> Fixes: 604326b41a6f ("bpf, sockmap: convert to generic sk_msg interface")
> Signed-off-by: Jiayuan Chen <jiayuan.chen@linux.dev>
> 
> ---
> V1->V2: Use existing flag instead of adding new one.
> https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20250605142448.3llri3w7wbclfxwc@gmail.com/
> 
> Thanks to Michal Luczaj for providing the sockmap_redir test case, which
> indeed covers almost all sockmap forwarding paths.
> ---
>  net/core/skmsg.c | 7 +++++++
>  1 file changed, 7 insertions(+)
> 

Reviewed-by: John Fastabend <john.fastabend@gmail.com>

  reply	other threads:[~2025-06-09  4:20 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2025-06-09  2:59 [PATCH bpf-next v2] bpf, sockmap: Fix psock incorrectly pointing to sk Jiayuan Chen
2025-06-09  4:20 ` John Fastabend [this message]
2025-06-10 17:54 ` patchwork-bot+netdevbpf

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20250609042024.ta4fuiogxxklolst@gmail.com \
    --to=john.fastabend@gmail.com \
    --cc=ast@kernel.org \
    --cc=bpf@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=daniel@iogearbox.net \
    --cc=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=edumazet@google.com \
    --cc=horms@kernel.org \
    --cc=jakub@cloudflare.com \
    --cc=jiayuan.chen@linux.dev \
    --cc=kuba@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.