From: Masami Hiramatsu (Google) <mhiramat@kernel.org>
To: Naresh Kamboju <naresh.kamboju@linaro.org>
Cc: open list <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Linux trace kernel <linux-trace-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
lkft-triage@lists.linaro.org,
Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au>,
Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@kernel.org>,
Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>,
Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@linaro.org>,
Anders Roxell <anders.roxell@linaro.org>
Subject: Re: next-20250605: Test regression: qemu-x86_64-compat mode ltp tracing Oops int3 kernel panic
Date: Mon, 9 Jun 2025 22:09:34 +0900 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20250609220934.2c3ed98ba8c624fc7cb45172@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CA+G9fYsLu0roY3DV=tKyqP7FEKbOEETRvTDhnpPxJGbA=Cg+4w@mail.gmail.com>
On Thu, 5 Jun 2025 17:12:10 +0530
Naresh Kamboju <naresh.kamboju@linaro.org> wrote:
> Regressions found on qemu-x86_64 with compat mode (64-bit kernel
> running on 32-bit userspace) while running LTP tracing test suite
> on Linux next-20250605 tag kernel.
>
> Regressions found on
> - LTP tracing
>
> Regression Analysis:
> - New regression? Yes
> - Reproducible? Intermittent
>
> Test regression: qemu-x86_64-compat mode ltp tracing Oops int3 kernel panic
>
> Reported-by: Linux Kernel Functional Testing <lkft@linaro.org>
>
> ## Test log
> ftrace-stress-test: <12>[ 21.971153] /usr/local/bin/kirk[277]:
> starting test ftrace-stress-test (ftrace_stress_test.sh 90)
> <4>[ 58.997439] Oops: int3: 0000 [#1] SMP PTI
> <4>[ 58.998089] CPU: 0 UID: 0 PID: 323 Comm: sh Not tainted
> 6.15.0-next-20250605 #1 PREEMPT(voluntary)
> <4>[ 58.998152] Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (Q35 + ICH9, 2009),
> BIOS 1.16.3-debian-1.16.3-2 04/01/2014
> <4>[ 58.998260] RIP: 0010:_raw_spin_lock+0x5/0x50
Interesting. This hits a stray int3 for ftrace on _raw_spin_lock.
Here is the compiled code of _raw_spin_lock.
ffffffff825daa00 <_raw_spin_lock>:
ffffffff825daa00: f3 0f 1e fa endbr64
ffffffff825daa04: e8 47 a6 d5 fe call ffffffff81335050 <__fentry__>
Since int3 exception happens after decoded int3 (1 byte), the RIP
`_raw_spin_lock+0x05` is not an instruction boundary.
> <4>[ 58.998563] Code: 5d e9 ff 12 00 00 66 66 2e 0f 1f 84 00 00 00
> 00 00 0f 1f 40 00 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 f3
> 0f 1e fa 0f <1f> 44 00 00 55 48 89 e5 53 48 89 fb bf 01 00 00 00 e8 15
> 12 e4 fe
And the call is already modified back to a 5-bytes nop when we
dump the code. Thus it may hit the intermediate int3 for transforming
code.
e8 47 a6 d5 fe
(first step)
cc 47 a6 d5 fe
(second step)
cc 1f 44 00 00 <- hit?
(third step)
0f 1f 44 00 00 <- handle int3
It is very unlikely scenario (and I'm not sure qemu can correctly
emulate it.) But if a CPU hits the int3 (cc) on _raw_spin_lock()+0x4
before anoter CPU' runs third step in smp_text_poke_batch_finish(),
and before the CPU runs smp_text_poke_int3_handler(), the CPU' runs
the thrid step and sets text_poke_array_refs 0,
the smp_text_poke_int3_handler() returns 0 and causes the same
problem.
<CPU0> <CPU1>
Start smp_text_poke_batch_finish().
Finish second step.
Hit int3 (*)
Finish third step.
Run smp_text_poke_sync_each_cpu().(**)
Clear text_poke_array_refs[cpu0]
Start smp_text_poke_int3_handler()
Failed to get text_poke_array_refs[cpu0]
Oops: int3
But as I said it is very unlikely, because as far as I know;
(*) smp_text_poke_int3_handler() is called directly from exc_int3()
which is a kind of NMI, so other interrupt should not run.
(**) In the third step, smp_text_poke_batch_finish() sends IPI for
sync core after removing int3. Thus any int3 exception handling
should be finished.
Is this bug reproducible easier recently?
Thanks,
--
Masami Hiramatsu (Google) <mhiramat@kernel.org>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-06-09 13:09 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 34+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-06-05 11:42 next-20250605: Test regression: qemu-x86_64-compat mode ltp tracing Oops int3 kernel panic Naresh Kamboju
2025-06-09 13:09 ` Masami Hiramatsu [this message]
2025-06-10 8:41 ` Masami Hiramatsu
2025-06-10 13:25 ` Steven Rostedt
2025-06-10 13:20 ` Naresh Kamboju
2025-06-10 14:43 ` Masami Hiramatsu
2025-06-10 14:47 ` [RFC PATCH 1/2] x86: Retry with new instruction if INT3 is disappaered Masami Hiramatsu (Google)
2025-06-10 14:47 ` [RFC PATCH 2/2] x86: alternative: Invalidate the cache for updated instructions Masami Hiramatsu (Google)
2025-06-10 15:50 ` Steven Rostedt
2025-06-11 0:21 ` Masami Hiramatsu
2025-06-11 10:26 ` Masami Hiramatsu
2025-06-11 14:20 ` Steven Rostedt
2025-06-11 15:42 ` Steven Rostedt
2025-06-12 0:04 ` Masami Hiramatsu
2025-06-11 11:30 ` Peter Zijlstra
2025-06-12 0:17 ` Masami Hiramatsu
2025-06-12 16:24 ` Naresh Kamboju
2025-06-13 3:09 ` Masami Hiramatsu
2025-06-10 14:53 ` next-20250605: Test regression: qemu-x86_64-compat mode ltp tracing Oops int3 kernel panic Steven Rostedt
2025-06-12 13:09 ` Naresh Kamboju
2025-06-13 8:27 ` Masami Hiramatsu
2025-06-13 12:01 ` Masami Hiramatsu
2025-06-16 7:36 ` Masami Hiramatsu
2025-06-17 10:41 ` Masami Hiramatsu
2025-06-17 12:10 ` Naresh Kamboju
2025-06-17 12:25 ` Steven Rostedt
2025-06-17 12:31 ` Naresh Kamboju
2025-06-17 14:29 ` Steven Rostedt
2025-06-17 23:40 ` Masami Hiramatsu
2025-06-19 14:00 ` Steven Rostedt
2025-06-17 16:45 ` Naresh Kamboju
2025-06-17 23:05 ` Masami Hiramatsu
2025-06-17 23:32 ` Steven Rostedt
2025-06-10 0:29 ` Steven Rostedt
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20250609220934.2c3ed98ba8c624fc7cb45172@kernel.org \
--to=mhiramat@kernel.org \
--cc=anders.roxell@linaro.org \
--cc=arnd@arndb.de \
--cc=dan.carpenter@linaro.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-trace-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=lkft-triage@lists.linaro.org \
--cc=naresh.kamboju@linaro.org \
--cc=sfr@canb.auug.org.au \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.