From: Amery Hung <ameryhung@gmail.com>
To: bpf@vger.kernel.org
Cc: alexei.starovoitov@gmail.com, andrii@kernel.org,
daniel@iogearbox.net, tj@kernel.org, martin.lau@kernel.org,
ameryhung@gmail.com, kernel-team@meta.com
Subject: [PATCH bpf-next v1 3/4] selftests/bpf: Test accessing struct_ops this pointer
Date: Mon, 9 Jun 2025 16:27:45 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20250609232746.1030044-3-ameryhung@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250609232746.1030044-1-ameryhung@gmail.com>
Test struct_ops this pointer using bpf_testmod_ops3. Add an integer
field, data, to bpf_testmod_ops3 and a kfunc that reads data through
aux->this_st_ops. Check if the kfunc reads the correct value of data.
Signed-off-by: Amery Hung <ameryhung@gmail.com>
---
.../bpf/prog_tests/test_struct_ops_this_ptr.c | 10 ++++++
.../progs/struct_ops_private_stack_recur.c | 3 +-
.../selftests/bpf/progs/struct_ops_this_ptr.c | 30 ++++++++++++++++
.../selftests/bpf/test_kmods/bpf_testmod.c | 36 +++++++++++++++++--
.../selftests/bpf/test_kmods/bpf_testmod.h | 1 +
.../bpf/test_kmods/bpf_testmod_kfunc.h | 3 ++
6 files changed, 78 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
create mode 100644 tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/test_struct_ops_this_ptr.c
create mode 100644 tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/struct_ops_this_ptr.c
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/test_struct_ops_this_ptr.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/test_struct_ops_this_ptr.c
new file mode 100644
index 000000000000..6ef238a2050a
--- /dev/null
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/test_struct_ops_this_ptr.c
@@ -0,0 +1,10 @@
+// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0-only
+
+#include <test_progs.h>
+
+#include "struct_ops_this_ptr.skel.h"
+
+void serial_test_struct_ops_this_ptr(void)
+{
+ RUN_TESTS(struct_ops_this_ptr);
+}
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/struct_ops_private_stack_recur.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/struct_ops_private_stack_recur.c
index 31e58389bb8b..215b675ddf94 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/struct_ops_private_stack_recur.c
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/struct_ops_private_stack_recur.c
@@ -4,6 +4,7 @@
#include <bpf/bpf_helpers.h>
#include <bpf/bpf_tracing.h>
#include "../test_kmods/bpf_testmod.h"
+#include "../test_kmods/bpf_testmod_kfunc.h"
char _license[] SEC("license") = "GPL";
@@ -13,8 +14,6 @@ bool skip __attribute((__section__(".data"))) = false;
bool skip = true;
#endif
-void bpf_testmod_ops3_call_test_1(void) __ksym;
-
int val_i, val_j;
__noinline static int subprog2(int *a, int *b)
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/struct_ops_this_ptr.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/struct_ops_this_ptr.c
new file mode 100644
index 000000000000..e5a6463c27ad
--- /dev/null
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/struct_ops_this_ptr.c
@@ -0,0 +1,30 @@
+// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0-only
+
+#include <vmlinux.h>
+#include <bpf/bpf_tracing.h>
+#include "../test_kmods/bpf_testmod.h"
+#include "../test_kmods/bpf_testmod_kfunc.h"
+#include "bpf_misc.h"
+
+char _license[] SEC("license") = "GPL";
+
+SEC("struct_ops")
+int BPF_PROG(test1)
+{
+ return bpf_kfunc_st_ops_test_this_ptr_impl(NULL);
+}
+
+SEC("syscall")
+__success __retval(1234)
+int syscall_this_ptr(void *ctx)
+{
+ return bpf_testmod_ops3_call_test_1();
+}
+
+SEC(".struct_ops.link")
+struct bpf_testmod_ops3 testmod_this_ptr = {
+ .test_1 = (void *)test1,
+ .data = 1234,
+};
+
+
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_kmods/bpf_testmod.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_kmods/bpf_testmod.c
index 2e54b95ad898..f692ee43d25c 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_kmods/bpf_testmod.c
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_kmods/bpf_testmod.c
@@ -272,9 +272,9 @@ static void bpf_testmod_test_struct_ops3(void)
st_ops3->test_1();
}
-__bpf_kfunc void bpf_testmod_ops3_call_test_1(void)
+__bpf_kfunc int bpf_testmod_ops3_call_test_1(void)
{
- st_ops3->test_1();
+ return st_ops3->test_1();
}
__bpf_kfunc void bpf_testmod_ops3_call_test_2(void)
@@ -1057,6 +1057,23 @@ __bpf_kfunc int bpf_kfunc_st_ops_inc10(struct st_ops_args *args)
return args->a;
}
+__bpf_kfunc int bpf_kfunc_st_ops_test_this_ptr_impl(void *aux__prog)
+{
+ struct bpf_prog_aux *aux = (struct bpf_prog_aux *)aux__prog;
+ struct bpf_testmod_ops3 *ops;
+ int data = -1;
+
+ rcu_read_lock();
+ ops = rcu_dereference(aux->this_st_ops);
+ if (!ops)
+ goto out;
+
+ data = ops->data;
+out:
+ rcu_read_unlock();
+ return data;
+}
+
BTF_KFUNCS_START(bpf_testmod_check_kfunc_ids)
BTF_ID_FLAGS(func, bpf_testmod_test_mod_kfunc)
BTF_ID_FLAGS(func, bpf_kfunc_call_test1)
@@ -1097,6 +1114,7 @@ BTF_ID_FLAGS(func, bpf_kfunc_st_ops_test_prologue, KF_TRUSTED_ARGS | KF_SLEEPABL
BTF_ID_FLAGS(func, bpf_kfunc_st_ops_test_epilogue, KF_TRUSTED_ARGS | KF_SLEEPABLE)
BTF_ID_FLAGS(func, bpf_kfunc_st_ops_test_pro_epilogue, KF_TRUSTED_ARGS | KF_SLEEPABLE)
BTF_ID_FLAGS(func, bpf_kfunc_st_ops_inc10, KF_TRUSTED_ARGS)
+BTF_ID_FLAGS(func, bpf_kfunc_st_ops_test_this_ptr_impl)
BTF_KFUNCS_END(bpf_testmod_check_kfunc_ids)
static int bpf_testmod_ops_init(struct btf *btf)
@@ -1269,6 +1287,17 @@ static void test_1_recursion_detected(struct bpf_prog *prog)
u64_stats_read(&stats->misses));
}
+static int st_ops3_init_member(const struct btf_type *t,
+ const struct btf_member *member,
+ void *kdata, const void *udata)
+{
+ if (member->offset == offsetof(struct bpf_testmod_ops3, data) * 8) {
+ ((struct bpf_testmod_ops3 *)kdata)->data = ((struct bpf_testmod_ops3 *)udata)->data;
+ return 1;
+ }
+ return 0;
+}
+
static int st_ops3_check_member(const struct btf_type *t,
const struct btf_member *member,
const struct bpf_prog *prog)
@@ -1289,13 +1318,14 @@ static int st_ops3_check_member(const struct btf_type *t,
struct bpf_struct_ops bpf_testmod_ops3 = {
.verifier_ops = &bpf_testmod_verifier_ops3,
.init = bpf_testmod_ops_init,
- .init_member = bpf_testmod_ops_init_member,
+ .init_member = st_ops3_init_member,
.reg = st_ops3_reg,
.unreg = st_ops3_unreg,
.check_member = st_ops3_check_member,
.cfi_stubs = &__bpf_testmod_ops3,
.name = "bpf_testmod_ops3",
.owner = THIS_MODULE,
+ .flags = BPF_STRUCT_OPS_F_THIS_PTR,
};
static int bpf_test_mod_st_ops__test_prologue(struct st_ops_args *args)
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_kmods/bpf_testmod.h b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_kmods/bpf_testmod.h
index c9fab51f16e2..13581657fe35 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_kmods/bpf_testmod.h
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_kmods/bpf_testmod.h
@@ -103,6 +103,7 @@ struct bpf_testmod_ops2 {
struct bpf_testmod_ops3 {
int (*test_1)(void);
int (*test_2)(void);
+ int data;
};
struct st_ops_args {
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_kmods/bpf_testmod_kfunc.h b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_kmods/bpf_testmod_kfunc.h
index b58817938deb..625b3f4b03f6 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_kmods/bpf_testmod_kfunc.h
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_kmods/bpf_testmod_kfunc.h
@@ -159,4 +159,7 @@ void bpf_kfunc_trusted_task_test(struct task_struct *ptr) __ksym;
void bpf_kfunc_trusted_num_test(int *ptr) __ksym;
void bpf_kfunc_rcu_task_test(struct task_struct *ptr) __ksym;
+int bpf_testmod_ops3_call_test_1(void) __ksym;
+int bpf_kfunc_st_ops_test_this_ptr_impl(void *aux__prog) __ksym;
+
#endif /* _BPF_TESTMOD_KFUNC_H */
--
2.47.1
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-06-09 23:27 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-06-09 23:27 [PATCH bpf-next v1 1/4] bpf: Save struct_ops instance pointer in bpf_prog_aux Amery Hung
2025-06-09 23:27 ` [PATCH bpf-next v1 2/4] bpf: Allow verifier to fixup kernel module kfuncs Amery Hung
2025-06-09 23:27 ` Amery Hung [this message]
2025-06-09 23:27 ` [PATCH bpf-next v1 4/4] selftests/bpf: Test accessing struct_ops this pointer in timer callback Amery Hung
[not found] ` <8c4943cb40967d152abe032b4208a7cdd89b539da26783afaa61e37eb6663cbf@mail.kernel.org>
2025-06-10 16:45 ` Amery Hung
2025-06-10 22:15 ` [PATCH bpf-next v1 1/4] bpf: Save struct_ops instance pointer in bpf_prog_aux Tejun Heo
2025-06-11 7:16 ` kernel test robot
2025-06-12 23:08 ` Andrii Nakryiko
2025-06-18 22:18 ` Amery Hung
2025-06-24 15:38 ` Andrii Nakryiko
2025-06-24 15:59 ` Alexei Starovoitov
2025-06-24 19:41 ` Andrii Nakryiko
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20250609232746.1030044-3-ameryhung@gmail.com \
--to=ameryhung@gmail.com \
--cc=alexei.starovoitov@gmail.com \
--cc=andrii@kernel.org \
--cc=bpf@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=daniel@iogearbox.net \
--cc=kernel-team@meta.com \
--cc=martin.lau@kernel.org \
--cc=tj@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.