All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Chuck Lever <cel@kernel.org>
To: NeilBrown <neil@brown.name>, Jeff Layton <jlayton@kernel.org>,
	Olga Kornievskaia <okorniev@redhat.com>,
	Dai Ngo <dai.ngo@oracle.com>, Tom Talpey <tom@talpey.com>
Cc: <linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org>, Chuck Lever <chuck.lever@oracle.com>
Subject: [RFC PATCH 1/3] NFSD: Rename a function parameter
Date: Tue, 10 Jun 2025 12:05:07 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20250610160509.97599-2-cel@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250610160509.97599-1-cel@kernel.org>

From: Chuck Lever <chuck.lever@oracle.com>

Clean up: A function parameter called "rqstp" typically refers to an
object of type "struct svc_rqst", so it's confusing when such an
parameter refers to a different struct type with field names that are
very similar to svc_rqst.

Signed-off-by: Chuck Lever <chuck.lever@oracle.com>
---
 fs/nfsd/nfsctl.c | 28 ++++++++++++++--------------
 1 file changed, 14 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-)

diff --git a/fs/nfsd/nfsctl.c b/fs/nfsd/nfsctl.c
index 3f3e9f6c4250..b9b2189ce880 100644
--- a/fs/nfsd/nfsctl.c
+++ b/fs/nfsd/nfsctl.c
@@ -1436,7 +1436,7 @@ unsigned int nfsd_net_id;
 
 static int nfsd_genl_rpc_status_compose_msg(struct sk_buff *skb,
 					    struct netlink_callback *cb,
-					    struct nfsd_genl_rqstp *rqstp)
+					    struct nfsd_genl_rqstp *genl_rqstp)
 {
 	void *hdr;
 	u32 i;
@@ -1446,22 +1446,22 @@ static int nfsd_genl_rpc_status_compose_msg(struct sk_buff *skb,
 	if (!hdr)
 		return -ENOBUFS;
 
-	if (nla_put_be32(skb, NFSD_A_RPC_STATUS_XID, rqstp->rq_xid) ||
-	    nla_put_u32(skb, NFSD_A_RPC_STATUS_FLAGS, rqstp->rq_flags) ||
-	    nla_put_u32(skb, NFSD_A_RPC_STATUS_PROG, rqstp->rq_prog) ||
-	    nla_put_u32(skb, NFSD_A_RPC_STATUS_PROC, rqstp->rq_proc) ||
-	    nla_put_u8(skb, NFSD_A_RPC_STATUS_VERSION, rqstp->rq_vers) ||
+	if (nla_put_be32(skb, NFSD_A_RPC_STATUS_XID, genl_rqstp->rq_xid) ||
+	    nla_put_u32(skb, NFSD_A_RPC_STATUS_FLAGS, genl_rqstp->rq_flags) ||
+	    nla_put_u32(skb, NFSD_A_RPC_STATUS_PROG, genl_rqstp->rq_prog) ||
+	    nla_put_u32(skb, NFSD_A_RPC_STATUS_PROC, genl_rqstp->rq_proc) ||
+	    nla_put_u8(skb, NFSD_A_RPC_STATUS_VERSION, genl_rqstp->rq_vers) ||
 	    nla_put_s64(skb, NFSD_A_RPC_STATUS_SERVICE_TIME,
-			ktime_to_us(rqstp->rq_stime),
+			ktime_to_us(genl_rqstp->rq_stime),
 			NFSD_A_RPC_STATUS_PAD))
 		return -ENOBUFS;
 
-	switch (rqstp->rq_saddr.sa_family) {
+	switch (genl_rqstp->rq_saddr.sa_family) {
 	case AF_INET: {
 		const struct sockaddr_in *s_in, *d_in;
 
-		s_in = (const struct sockaddr_in *)&rqstp->rq_saddr;
-		d_in = (const struct sockaddr_in *)&rqstp->rq_daddr;
+		s_in = (const struct sockaddr_in *)&genl_rqstp->rq_saddr;
+		d_in = (const struct sockaddr_in *)&genl_rqstp->rq_daddr;
 		if (nla_put_in_addr(skb, NFSD_A_RPC_STATUS_SADDR4,
 				    s_in->sin_addr.s_addr) ||
 		    nla_put_in_addr(skb, NFSD_A_RPC_STATUS_DADDR4,
@@ -1476,8 +1476,8 @@ static int nfsd_genl_rpc_status_compose_msg(struct sk_buff *skb,
 	case AF_INET6: {
 		const struct sockaddr_in6 *s_in, *d_in;
 
-		s_in = (const struct sockaddr_in6 *)&rqstp->rq_saddr;
-		d_in = (const struct sockaddr_in6 *)&rqstp->rq_daddr;
+		s_in = (const struct sockaddr_in6 *)&genl_rqstp->rq_saddr;
+		d_in = (const struct sockaddr_in6 *)&genl_rqstp->rq_daddr;
 		if (nla_put_in6_addr(skb, NFSD_A_RPC_STATUS_SADDR6,
 				     &s_in->sin6_addr) ||
 		    nla_put_in6_addr(skb, NFSD_A_RPC_STATUS_DADDR6,
@@ -1491,9 +1491,9 @@ static int nfsd_genl_rpc_status_compose_msg(struct sk_buff *skb,
 	}
 	}
 
-	for (i = 0; i < rqstp->rq_opcnt; i++)
+	for (i = 0; i < genl_rqstp->rq_opcnt; i++)
 		if (nla_put_u32(skb, NFSD_A_RPC_STATUS_COMPOUND_OPS,
-				rqstp->rq_opnum[i]))
+				genl_rqstp->rq_opnum[i]))
 			return -ENOBUFS;
 
 	genlmsg_end(skb, hdr);
-- 
2.49.0


  reply	other threads:[~2025-06-10 16:05 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2025-06-10 16:05 [RFC PATCH 0/3] Remove the max-ops-per-compound-limit Chuck Lever
2025-06-10 16:05 ` Chuck Lever [this message]
2025-06-10 16:05 ` [RFC PATCH 2/3] NFSD: Make nfsd_genl_rqstp::rq_ops array best-effort Chuck Lever
2025-06-10 16:05 ` [RFC PATCH 3/3] NFSD: Remove the cap on number of operations per NFSv4 COMPOUND Chuck Lever
2025-06-10 17:01   ` Jeff Layton
2025-06-10 17:07     ` Chuck Lever
2025-06-10 17:28 ` [RFC PATCH 0/3] Remove the max-ops-per-compound-limit Jeff Layton

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20250610160509.97599-2-cel@kernel.org \
    --to=cel@kernel.org \
    --cc=chuck.lever@oracle.com \
    --cc=dai.ngo@oracle.com \
    --cc=jlayton@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=neil@brown.name \
    --cc=okorniev@redhat.com \
    --cc=tom@talpey.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.