From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
To: Kanchan Joshi <joshi.k@samsung.com>
Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>, Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>,
Keith Busch <kbusch@kernel.org>, Sagi Grimberg <sagi@grimberg.me>,
Chaitanya Kulkarni <kch@nvidia.com>,
Leon Romanovsky <leon@kernel.org>,
Nitesh Shetty <nj.shetty@samsung.com>,
Logan Gunthorpe <logang@deltatee.com>,
linux-block@vger.kernel.org, linux-nvme@lists.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/9] block: don't merge different kinds of P2P transfers in a single bio
Date: Fri, 13 Jun 2025 08:19:12 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20250613061912.GA9517@lst.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <c75ac878-376e-497b-b4fe-ddd54733c090@samsung.com>
On Thu, Jun 12, 2025 at 11:54:21AM +0530, Kanchan Joshi wrote:
> On 6/10/2025 10:36 AM, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> > --- a/block/bio.c
> > +++ b/block/bio.c
> > @@ -930,8 +930,6 @@ static bool bvec_try_merge_page(struct bio_vec *bv, struct page *page,
> > return false;
> > if (xen_domain() && !xen_biovec_phys_mergeable(bv, page))
> > return false;
> > - if (!zone_device_pages_have_same_pgmap(bv->bv_page, page))
> > - return false;
>
> I did not understand the value of moving this out to its two callers
> (bio_add_page and bio_integrity_add_page).
>
> Since this check existed, I am a bit confused. The thing that patch
> title says - is not a new addition and used to happen earlier too?
> Or is this about setting REQ_NOMERGE in bio?
It is about not merging mismatch pgmaps into a bio, for which it needs
to be in the caller. The current code only prevents merges into the
same bio_vec.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-06-13 6:19 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 65+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-06-10 5:06 new DMA API conversion for nvme-pci Christoph Hellwig
2025-06-10 5:06 ` [PATCH 1/9] block: don't merge different kinds of P2P transfers in a single bio Christoph Hellwig
2025-06-10 12:44 ` Leon Romanovsky
2025-06-10 15:37 ` Keith Busch
2025-06-11 3:43 ` Christoph Hellwig
2025-06-11 16:26 ` Keith Busch
2025-06-11 16:39 ` Logan Gunthorpe
2025-06-11 16:41 ` Keith Busch
2025-06-11 19:41 ` Logan Gunthorpe
2025-06-11 20:00 ` Keith Busch
2025-06-12 4:57 ` Christoph Hellwig
2025-06-12 6:24 ` Kanchan Joshi
2025-06-13 6:19 ` Christoph Hellwig [this message]
2025-06-12 15:22 ` Logan Gunthorpe
2025-06-10 5:06 ` [PATCH 2/9] block: add scatterlist-less DMA mapping helpers Christoph Hellwig
2025-06-10 12:51 ` Leon Romanovsky
2025-06-11 13:43 ` Daniel Gomez
2025-06-16 5:02 ` Christoph Hellwig
2025-06-16 6:43 ` Daniel Gomez
2025-06-16 11:31 ` Christoph Hellwig
2025-06-16 12:37 ` Daniel Gomez
2025-06-16 12:42 ` Christoph Hellwig
2025-06-16 12:52 ` Daniel Gomez
2025-06-16 13:01 ` Christoph Hellwig
2025-06-12 6:35 ` Kanchan Joshi
2025-06-13 6:17 ` Christoph Hellwig
2025-06-10 5:06 ` [PATCH 3/9] nvme-pci: simplify nvme_pci_metadata_use_sgls Christoph Hellwig
2025-06-10 12:52 ` Leon Romanovsky
2025-06-11 21:38 ` Keith Busch
2025-06-12 4:59 ` Christoph Hellwig
2025-06-10 5:06 ` [PATCH 4/9] nvme-pci: refactor nvme_pci_use_sgls Christoph Hellwig
2025-06-10 13:10 ` Leon Romanovsky
2025-06-11 13:43 ` Daniel Gomez
2025-06-12 5:00 ` Christoph Hellwig
2025-06-11 20:50 ` Keith Busch
2025-06-12 5:00 ` Christoph Hellwig
2025-06-10 5:06 ` [PATCH 5/9] nvme-pci: merge the simple PRP and SGL setup into a common helper Christoph Hellwig
2025-06-10 13:13 ` Leon Romanovsky
2025-06-11 13:44 ` Daniel Gomez
2025-06-12 5:01 ` Christoph Hellwig
2025-06-11 21:03 ` Keith Busch
2025-06-12 5:01 ` Christoph Hellwig
2025-06-10 5:06 ` [PATCH 6/9] nvme-pci: remove superfluous arguments Christoph Hellwig
2025-06-10 13:15 ` Leon Romanovsky
2025-06-11 21:05 ` Keith Busch
2025-06-10 5:06 ` [PATCH 7/9] nvme-pci: convert the data mapping blk_rq_dma_map Christoph Hellwig
2025-06-10 13:19 ` Leon Romanovsky
2025-06-11 12:15 ` Daniel Gomez
2025-06-12 5:02 ` Christoph Hellwig
2025-06-16 7:41 ` Daniel Gomez
2025-06-16 11:33 ` Christoph Hellwig
2025-06-17 17:33 ` Daniel Gomez
2025-06-17 23:25 ` Keith Busch
2025-06-17 17:43 ` Daniel Gomez
2025-06-17 17:45 ` Daniel Gomez
2025-06-11 14:13 ` Daniel Gomez
2025-06-12 5:03 ` Christoph Hellwig
2025-06-16 7:49 ` Daniel Gomez
2025-06-16 11:35 ` Christoph Hellwig
2025-06-10 5:06 ` [PATCH 8/9] nvme-pci: replace NVME_MAX_KB_SZ with NVME_MAX_BYTE Christoph Hellwig
2025-06-10 13:20 ` Leon Romanovsky
2025-06-11 14:00 ` Daniel Gomez
2025-06-10 5:06 ` [PATCH 9/9] nvme-pci: rework the build time assert for NVME_MAX_NR_DESCRIPTORS Christoph Hellwig
2025-06-10 13:21 ` Leon Romanovsky
2025-06-11 13:51 ` Daniel Gomez
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20250613061912.GA9517@lst.de \
--to=hch@lst.de \
--cc=axboe@kernel.dk \
--cc=joshi.k@samsung.com \
--cc=kbusch@kernel.org \
--cc=kch@nvidia.com \
--cc=leon@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-block@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-nvme@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=logang@deltatee.com \
--cc=nj.shetty@samsung.com \
--cc=sagi@grimberg.me \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.