All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@nvidia.com>
To: Alex Williamson <alex.williamson@redhat.com>
Cc: Jacob Pan <jacob.pan@linux.microsoft.com>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	"iommu@lists.linux.dev" <iommu@lists.linux.dev>,
	"Liu, Yi L" <yi.l.liu@intel.com>,
	Zhang Yu <zhangyu1@microsoft.com>,
	Easwar Hariharan <eahariha@linux.microsoft.com>,
	Saurabh Sengar <ssengar@linux.microsoft.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 2/2] vfio: Fix unbalanced vfio_df_close call in no-iommu mode
Date: Mon, 16 Jun 2025 12:34:55 -0300	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20250616153455.GK1174925@nvidia.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250616084708.5a94ead7.alex.williamson@redhat.com>

On Mon, Jun 16, 2025 at 08:47:08AM -0600, Alex Williamson wrote:
> On Fri, 13 Jun 2025 21:15:55 -0300
> Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@nvidia.com> wrote:
> 
> > On Fri, Jun 13, 2025 at 04:31:03PM -0600, Alex Williamson wrote:
> > > On Tue,  3 Jun 2025 08:23:43 -0700
> > > Jacob Pan <jacob.pan@linux.microsoft.com> wrote:
> > >   
> > > > From: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@nvidia.com>
> > > > 
> > > > For devices with no-iommu enabled in IOMMUFD VFIO compat mode, the group
> > > > open path skips vfio_df_open(), leaving open_count at 0. This causes a
> > > > warning in vfio_assert_device_open(device) when vfio_df_close() is called
> > > > during group close.
> > > > 
> > > > The correct behavior is to skip only the IOMMUFD bind in the device open
> > > > path for no-iommu devices. Commit 6086efe73498 omitted vfio_df_open(),
> > > > which was too broad. This patch restores the previous behavior, ensuring
> > > > the vfio_df_open is called in the group open path.
> > > > 
> > > > Fixes: 6086efe73498 ("vfio-iommufd: Move noiommu compat validation out of vfio_iommufd_bind()")
> > > > Signed-off-by: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@nvidia.com>
> > > > Tested-by: Jacob Pan <jacob.pan@linux.microsoft.com>
> > > > Signed-off-by: Jacob Pan <jacob.pan@linux.microsoft.com>
> > > > ---
> > > > v2: Use a fix from Jason
> > > > ---
> > > >  drivers/vfio/group.c     | 10 +++++-----
> > > >  drivers/vfio/iommufd.c   |  3 ---
> > > >  drivers/vfio/vfio_main.c | 26 ++++++++++++++++----------
> > > >  3 files changed, 21 insertions(+), 18 deletions(-)
> > > > 
> > > > diff --git a/drivers/vfio/group.c b/drivers/vfio/group.c
> > > > index c321d442f0da..8f5fe8a392de 100644
> > > > --- a/drivers/vfio/group.c
> > > > +++ b/drivers/vfio/group.c
> > > > @@ -192,18 +192,18 @@ static int vfio_df_group_open(struct vfio_device_file *df)
> > > >  		 * implies they expected translation to exist
> > > >  		 */
> > > >  		if (!capable(CAP_SYS_RAWIO) ||
> > > > -		    vfio_iommufd_device_has_compat_ioas(device, df->iommufd))
> > > > +		    vfio_iommufd_device_has_compat_ioas(device, df->iommufd)) {
> > > >  			ret = -EPERM;
> > > > -		else
> > > > -			ret = 0;
> > > > -		goto out_put_kvm;
> > > > +			goto out_put_kvm;
> > > > +		}
> > > >  	}
> > > >  
> > > >  	ret = vfio_df_open(df);
> > > >  	if (ret)
> > > >  		goto out_put_kvm;
> > > >  
> > > > -	if (df->iommufd && device->open_count == 1) {
> > > > +	if (df->iommufd && device->open_count == 1 &&
> > > > +	    !vfio_device_is_noiommu(device)) {  
> > > 
> > > Why do we need this?  
> > 
> > What I was trying to do is put all the logic about noiommu into only
> > vfio_df..open/close functions instead of sprikling it into a bunch of
> > other functions. That seemed to be the right point to make this cut.
> 
> Alternatively we could be consistent about breaking out of the
> vfio/iommufd.c functions that aren't relevant to noiommu.  The
> container side handles noiommu internally, why should iommufd push
> handling up to the device file layer?  We're really just missing the
> bind path.

Broadly what I was going for was to just remove the iommufd stuff
entirely from the DF layer rather than to half pretend there is an
iommufd layer below it. This should ideally go as far as not having an
iommufd_ctx at all. So things start to look really weird calling
iommufd functions without an iommufd ctx.

> > With this patch we move toward the vfio_df..open/close functions being
> > symmetrical in their decision making.
> 
> But is it?  We special case all the iommufd paths to filter out noiommu
> but it's inconsistent with the legacy paths.  Thanks,

The container still exists in noiommu mode and internally does things,
eg it has a container->noiommu indicationm and the vfio-noiommu ops to
manage this.

The iommufd should not exist and should never be used. They are
different cases.

If Jacob eventually does what I suggested in another email then we
would have a noiommu special mode inside iommufd and it would look
more like the container.

Jason

  reply	other threads:[~2025-06-16 15:35 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2025-06-03 15:23 [PATCH v2 1/2] vfio: Prevent open_count decrement to negative Jacob Pan
2025-06-03 15:23 ` [PATCH v2 2/2] vfio: Fix unbalanced vfio_df_close call in no-iommu mode Jacob Pan
2025-06-13 22:31   ` Alex Williamson
2025-06-14  0:15     ` Jason Gunthorpe
2025-06-16 14:47       ` Alex Williamson
2025-06-16 15:34         ` Jason Gunthorpe [this message]
2025-06-16 19:40           ` Alex Williamson
2025-06-16 20:05             ` Jason Gunthorpe
2025-06-18 23:11               ` Jacob Pan
2025-06-18 23:25                 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2025-06-13 22:31 ` [PATCH v2 1/2] vfio: Prevent open_count decrement to negative Alex Williamson
2025-06-14  0:09   ` Jason Gunthorpe
2025-06-16 14:40     ` Alex Williamson
2025-06-18 23:08       ` Jacob Pan

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20250616153455.GK1174925@nvidia.com \
    --to=jgg@nvidia.com \
    --cc=alex.williamson@redhat.com \
    --cc=eahariha@linux.microsoft.com \
    --cc=iommu@lists.linux.dev \
    --cc=jacob.pan@linux.microsoft.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=ssengar@linux.microsoft.com \
    --cc=yi.l.liu@intel.com \
    --cc=zhangyu1@microsoft.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.