All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>
To: kernel@openeuler.org, zhangchangzhong <zhangchangzhong@huawei.com>
Cc: oe-kbuild-all@lists.linux.dev
Subject: [openeuler:openEuler-1.0-LTS 1666/1666] kernel/sched/core.c:5976:22: error: 'root_task_group' undeclared; did you mean 'task_group'?
Date: Wed, 18 Jun 2025 20:11:59 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <202506182031.ldH7VynO-lkp@intel.com> (raw)

Hi Hui,

FYI, the error/warning still remains.

tree:   https://gitee.com/openeuler/kernel.git openEuler-1.0-LTS
head:   4f84adc737008927c799b691e7b051bea90313cf
commit: 713cfd2684fa5ea08b144d92b9858b932c0f1705 [1666/1666] sched: Introduce smart grid scheduling strategy for cfs
config: arm64-randconfig-004-20250618 (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20250618/202506182031.ldH7VynO-lkp@intel.com/config)
compiler: aarch64-linux-gcc (GCC) 8.5.0
reproduce (this is a W=1 build): (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20250618/202506182031.ldH7VynO-lkp@intel.com/reproduce)

If you fix the issue in a separate patch/commit (i.e. not just a new version of
the same patch/commit), kindly add following tags
| Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>
| Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/oe-kbuild-all/202506182031.ldH7VynO-lkp@intel.com/

All errors (new ones prefixed by >>):

   kernel/sched/core.c:1587:6: warning: no previous prototype for 'sched_set_stop_task' [-Wmissing-prototypes]
    void sched_set_stop_task(int cpu, struct task_struct *stop)
         ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
   kernel/sched/core.c:3771:35: warning: no previous prototype for 'preempt_schedule_irq' [-Wmissing-prototypes]
    asmlinkage __visible void __sched preempt_schedule_irq(void)
                                      ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
   kernel/sched/core.c: In function 'sched_cpu_activate':
   kernel/sched/core.c:5845:2: error: implicit declaration of function 'tg_update_affinity_domains'; did you mean 'irq_create_affinity_masks'? [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration]
     tg_update_affinity_domains(cpu, 1);
     ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
     irq_create_affinity_masks
   kernel/sched/core.c: In function 'sched_init_smp':
   kernel/sched/core.c:5976:2: error: implicit declaration of function 'init_auto_affinity'; did you mean 'irq_set_affinity'? [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration]
     init_auto_affinity(&root_task_group);
     ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
     irq_set_affinity
>> kernel/sched/core.c:5976:22: error: 'root_task_group' undeclared (first use in this function); did you mean 'task_group'?
     init_auto_affinity(&root_task_group);
                         ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
                         task_group
   kernel/sched/core.c:5976:22: note: each undeclared identifier is reported only once for each function it appears in
   kernel/sched/core.c: In function 'sched_init':
   kernel/sched/core.c:6029:32: warning: variable 'ptr' set but not used [-Wunused-but-set-variable]
     unsigned long alloc_size = 0, ptr;
                                   ^~~
   cc1: some warnings being treated as errors


vim +5976 kernel/sched/core.c

  5949	
  5950	void __init sched_init_smp(void)
  5951	{
  5952		sched_init_numa();
  5953	
  5954		/*
  5955		 * There's no userspace yet to cause hotplug operations; hence all the
  5956		 * CPU masks are stable and all blatant races in the below code cannot
  5957		 * happen. The hotplug lock is nevertheless taken to satisfy lockdep,
  5958		 * but there won't be any contention on it.
  5959		 */
  5960		cpus_read_lock();
  5961		mutex_lock(&sched_domains_mutex);
  5962		sched_init_domains(cpu_active_mask);
  5963		mutex_unlock(&sched_domains_mutex);
  5964		cpus_read_unlock();
  5965	
  5966		/* Move init over to a non-isolated CPU */
  5967		if (set_cpus_allowed_ptr(current, housekeeping_cpumask(HK_FLAG_DOMAIN)) < 0)
  5968			BUG();
  5969		sched_init_granularity();
  5970	
  5971		init_sched_rt_class();
  5972		init_sched_dl_class();
  5973	
  5974		sched_smp_initialized = true;
  5975	
> 5976		init_auto_affinity(&root_task_group);
  5977	}
  5978	

-- 
0-DAY CI Kernel Test Service
https://github.com/intel/lkp-tests/wiki

                 reply	other threads:[~2025-06-18 12:13 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: [no followups] expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=202506182031.ldH7VynO-lkp@intel.com \
    --to=lkp@intel.com \
    --cc=kernel@openeuler.org \
    --cc=oe-kbuild-all@lists.linux.dev \
    --cc=zhangchangzhong@huawei.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.