All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
To: "Onur Özkan" <work@onurozkan.dev>
Cc: rust-for-linux@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	mingo@redhat.com, will@kernel.org, boqun.feng@gmail.com,
	longman@redhat.com, ojeda@kernel.org, alex.gaynor@gmail.com,
	gary@garyguo.net, bjorn3_gh@protonmail.com, lossin@kernel.org,
	a.hindborg@kernel.org, aliceryhl@google.com, tmgross@umich.edu,
	dakr@kernel.org, thatslyude@gmail.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH V3] implement `ww_mutex` abstraction for the Rust tree
Date: Thu, 19 Jun 2025 16:14:01 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20250619141401.GI1613376@noisy.programming.kicks-ass.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250619140656.498-1-work@onurozkan.dev>

On Thu, Jun 19, 2025 at 05:06:56PM +0300, Onur Özkan wrote:
> +bool rust_helper_ww_mutex_is_locked(struct ww_mutex *lock)
> +{
> +	return ww_mutex_is_locked(lock);
> +}

Do we really need this? In general I dislike all the _is_locked()
functions and would ideally like to remove them.

Pretty much the only useful pattern for any of the _is_locked()
functions is:

  WARN_ON_ONCE(!foo_is_locked(&foo));

Any other use is dodgy as heck.



  reply	other threads:[~2025-06-19 14:14 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2025-06-19 14:06 [PATCH V3] implement `ww_mutex` abstraction for the Rust tree Onur Özkan
2025-06-19 14:14 ` Peter Zijlstra [this message]
2025-06-19 14:33   ` Onur
2025-06-19 14:44     ` Alice Ryhl
2025-06-19 14:53       ` Peter Zijlstra
2025-06-19 18:59         ` Boqun Feng
2025-06-19 14:42 ` Benno Lossin
2025-06-21 10:32   ` Onur
2025-06-19 14:43 ` Benno Lossin

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20250619141401.GI1613376@noisy.programming.kicks-ass.net \
    --to=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=a.hindborg@kernel.org \
    --cc=alex.gaynor@gmail.com \
    --cc=aliceryhl@google.com \
    --cc=bjorn3_gh@protonmail.com \
    --cc=boqun.feng@gmail.com \
    --cc=dakr@kernel.org \
    --cc=gary@garyguo.net \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=longman@redhat.com \
    --cc=lossin@kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@redhat.com \
    --cc=ojeda@kernel.org \
    --cc=rust-for-linux@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=thatslyude@gmail.com \
    --cc=tmgross@umich.edu \
    --cc=will@kernel.org \
    --cc=work@onurozkan.dev \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.