From: <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
To: shinichiro.kawasaki@wdc.com,leon@kernel.org,yanjun.zhu@linux.dev
Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: FAILED: patch "[PATCH] RDMA/iwcm: Fix use-after-free of work objects after cm_id" failed to apply to 5.4-stable tree
Date: Fri, 20 Jun 2025 11:01:04 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <2025062004-henchman-staging-7b05@gregkh> (raw)
The patch below does not apply to the 5.4-stable tree.
If someone wants it applied there, or to any other stable or longterm
tree, then please email the backport, including the original git commit
id to <stable@vger.kernel.org>.
To reproduce the conflict and resubmit, you may use the following commands:
git fetch https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux.git/ linux-5.4.y
git checkout FETCH_HEAD
git cherry-pick -x 6883b680e703c6b2efddb4e7a8d891ce1803d06b
# <resolve conflicts, build, test, etc.>
git commit -s
git send-email --to '<stable@vger.kernel.org>' --in-reply-to '2025062004-henchman-staging-7b05@gregkh' --subject-prefix 'PATCH 5.4.y' HEAD^..
Possible dependencies:
thanks,
greg k-h
------------------ original commit in Linus's tree ------------------
From 6883b680e703c6b2efddb4e7a8d891ce1803d06b Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Shin'ichiro Kawasaki <shinichiro.kawasaki@wdc.com>
Date: Sat, 10 May 2025 19:10:36 +0900
Subject: [PATCH] RDMA/iwcm: Fix use-after-free of work objects after cm_id
destruction
The commit 59c68ac31e15 ("iw_cm: free cm_id resources on the last
deref") simplified cm_id resource management by freeing cm_id once all
references to the cm_id were removed. The references are removed either
upon completion of iw_cm event handlers or when the application destroys
the cm_id. This commit introduced the use-after-free condition where
cm_id_private object could still be in use by event handler works during
the destruction of cm_id. The commit aee2424246f9 ("RDMA/iwcm: Fix a
use-after-free related to destroying CM IDs") addressed this use-after-
free by flushing all pending works at the cm_id destruction.
However, still another use-after-free possibility remained. It happens
with the work objects allocated for each cm_id_priv within
alloc_work_entries() during cm_id creation, and subsequently freed in
dealloc_work_entries() once all references to the cm_id are removed.
If the cm_id's last reference is decremented in the event handler work,
the work object for the work itself gets removed, and causes the use-
after-free BUG below:
BUG: KASAN: slab-use-after-free in __pwq_activate_work+0x1ff/0x250
Read of size 8 at addr ffff88811f9cf800 by task kworker/u16:1/147091
CPU: 2 UID: 0 PID: 147091 Comm: kworker/u16:1 Not tainted 6.15.0-rc2+ #27 PREEMPT(voluntary)
Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996), BIOS 1.16.3-3.fc41 04/01/2014
Workqueue: 0x0 (iw_cm_wq)
Call Trace:
<TASK>
dump_stack_lvl+0x6a/0x90
print_report+0x174/0x554
? __virt_addr_valid+0x208/0x430
? __pwq_activate_work+0x1ff/0x250
kasan_report+0xae/0x170
? __pwq_activate_work+0x1ff/0x250
__pwq_activate_work+0x1ff/0x250
pwq_dec_nr_in_flight+0x8c5/0xfb0
process_one_work+0xc11/0x1460
? __pfx_process_one_work+0x10/0x10
? assign_work+0x16c/0x240
worker_thread+0x5ef/0xfd0
? __pfx_worker_thread+0x10/0x10
kthread+0x3b0/0x770
? __pfx_kthread+0x10/0x10
? rcu_is_watching+0x11/0xb0
? _raw_spin_unlock_irq+0x24/0x50
? rcu_is_watching+0x11/0xb0
? __pfx_kthread+0x10/0x10
ret_from_fork+0x30/0x70
? __pfx_kthread+0x10/0x10
ret_from_fork_asm+0x1a/0x30
</TASK>
Allocated by task 147416:
kasan_save_stack+0x2c/0x50
kasan_save_track+0x10/0x30
__kasan_kmalloc+0xa6/0xb0
alloc_work_entries+0xa9/0x260 [iw_cm]
iw_cm_connect+0x23/0x4a0 [iw_cm]
rdma_connect_locked+0xbfd/0x1920 [rdma_cm]
nvme_rdma_cm_handler+0x8e5/0x1b60 [nvme_rdma]
cma_cm_event_handler+0xae/0x320 [rdma_cm]
cma_work_handler+0x106/0x1b0 [rdma_cm]
process_one_work+0x84f/0x1460
worker_thread+0x5ef/0xfd0
kthread+0x3b0/0x770
ret_from_fork+0x30/0x70
ret_from_fork_asm+0x1a/0x30
Freed by task 147091:
kasan_save_stack+0x2c/0x50
kasan_save_track+0x10/0x30
kasan_save_free_info+0x37/0x60
__kasan_slab_free+0x4b/0x70
kfree+0x13a/0x4b0
dealloc_work_entries+0x125/0x1f0 [iw_cm]
iwcm_deref_id+0x6f/0xa0 [iw_cm]
cm_work_handler+0x136/0x1ba0 [iw_cm]
process_one_work+0x84f/0x1460
worker_thread+0x5ef/0xfd0
kthread+0x3b0/0x770
ret_from_fork+0x30/0x70
ret_from_fork_asm+0x1a/0x30
Last potentially related work creation:
kasan_save_stack+0x2c/0x50
kasan_record_aux_stack+0xa3/0xb0
__queue_work+0x2ff/0x1390
queue_work_on+0x67/0xc0
cm_event_handler+0x46a/0x820 [iw_cm]
siw_cm_upcall+0x330/0x650 [siw]
siw_cm_work_handler+0x6b9/0x2b20 [siw]
process_one_work+0x84f/0x1460
worker_thread+0x5ef/0xfd0
kthread+0x3b0/0x770
ret_from_fork+0x30/0x70
ret_from_fork_asm+0x1a/0x30
This BUG is reproducible by repeating the blktests test case nvme/061
for the rdma transport and the siw driver.
To avoid the use-after-free of cm_id_private work objects, ensure that
the last reference to the cm_id is decremented not in the event handler
works, but in the cm_id destruction context. For that purpose, move
iwcm_deref_id() call from destroy_cm_id() to the callers of
destroy_cm_id(). In iw_destroy_cm_id(), call iwcm_deref_id() after
flushing the pending works.
During the fix work, I noticed that iw_destroy_cm_id() is called from
cm_work_handler() and process_event() context. However, the comment of
iw_destroy_cm_id() notes that the function "cannot be called by the
event thread". Drop the false comment.
Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-rdma/r5676e754sv35aq7cdsqrlnvyhiq5zktteaurl7vmfih35efko@z6lay7uypy3c/
Fixes: 59c68ac31e15 ("iw_cm: free cm_id resources on the last deref")
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Shin'ichiro Kawasaki <shinichiro.kawasaki@wdc.com>
Link: https://patch.msgid.link/20250510101036.1756439-1-shinichiro.kawasaki@wdc.com
Reviewed-by: Zhu Yanjun <yanjun.zhu@linux.dev>
Signed-off-by: Leon Romanovsky <leon@kernel.org>
diff --git a/drivers/infiniband/core/iwcm.c b/drivers/infiniband/core/iwcm.c
index f4486cbd8f45..62410578dec3 100644
--- a/drivers/infiniband/core/iwcm.c
+++ b/drivers/infiniband/core/iwcm.c
@@ -368,12 +368,9 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL(iw_cm_disconnect);
/*
* CM_ID <-- DESTROYING
*
- * Clean up all resources associated with the connection and release
- * the initial reference taken by iw_create_cm_id.
- *
- * Returns true if and only if the last cm_id_priv reference has been dropped.
+ * Clean up all resources associated with the connection.
*/
-static bool destroy_cm_id(struct iw_cm_id *cm_id)
+static void destroy_cm_id(struct iw_cm_id *cm_id)
{
struct iwcm_id_private *cm_id_priv;
struct ib_qp *qp;
@@ -442,20 +439,22 @@ static bool destroy_cm_id(struct iw_cm_id *cm_id)
iwpm_remove_mapinfo(&cm_id->local_addr, &cm_id->m_local_addr);
iwpm_remove_mapping(&cm_id->local_addr, RDMA_NL_IWCM);
}
-
- return iwcm_deref_id(cm_id_priv);
}
/*
- * This function is only called by the application thread and cannot
- * be called by the event thread. The function will wait for all
- * references to be released on the cm_id and then kfree the cm_id
- * object.
+ * Destroy cm_id. If the cm_id still has other references, wait for all
+ * references to be released on the cm_id and then release the initial
+ * reference taken by iw_create_cm_id.
*/
void iw_destroy_cm_id(struct iw_cm_id *cm_id)
{
- if (!destroy_cm_id(cm_id))
+ struct iwcm_id_private *cm_id_priv;
+
+ cm_id_priv = container_of(cm_id, struct iwcm_id_private, id);
+ destroy_cm_id(cm_id);
+ if (refcount_read(&cm_id_priv->refcount) > 1)
flush_workqueue(iwcm_wq);
+ iwcm_deref_id(cm_id_priv);
}
EXPORT_SYMBOL(iw_destroy_cm_id);
@@ -1035,8 +1034,10 @@ static void cm_work_handler(struct work_struct *_work)
if (!test_bit(IWCM_F_DROP_EVENTS, &cm_id_priv->flags)) {
ret = process_event(cm_id_priv, &levent);
- if (ret)
- WARN_ON_ONCE(destroy_cm_id(&cm_id_priv->id));
+ if (ret) {
+ destroy_cm_id(&cm_id_priv->id);
+ WARN_ON_ONCE(iwcm_deref_id(cm_id_priv));
+ }
} else
pr_debug("dropping event %d\n", levent.event);
if (iwcm_deref_id(cm_id_priv))
reply other threads:[~2025-06-20 9:02 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: [no followups] expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=2025062004-henchman-staging-7b05@gregkh \
--to=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=leon@kernel.org \
--cc=shinichiro.kawasaki@wdc.com \
--cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=yanjun.zhu@linux.dev \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.