All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Eduard Zingerman <eddyz87@gmail.com>
To: bpf@vger.kernel.org, ast@kernel.org, andrii@kernel.org
Cc: daniel@iogearbox.net, martin.lau@linux.dev, kernel-team@fb.com,
	yonghong.song@linux.dev, eddyz87@gmail.com
Subject: [PATCH bpf-next v1 4/4] selftests/bpf: check operations on untrusted ro pointers to mem
Date: Tue, 24 Jun 2025 12:10:09 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20250624191009.902874-5-eddyz87@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250624191009.902874-1-eddyz87@gmail.com>

The following cases are tested:
- it is ok to load memory at any offset from rdonly_untrusted_mem;
- rdonly_untrusted_mem offset/bounds are not tracked;
- writes into rdonly_untrusted_mem are forbidden;
- atomic operations on rdonly_untrusted_mem are forbidden;
- rdonly_untrusted_mem can't be passed as a memory argument of a
  helper of kfunc;
- it is ok to use PTR_TO_MEM and PTR_TO_BTF_ID in a same load
  instruction.

Signed-off-by: Eduard Zingerman <eddyz87@gmail.com>
---
 .../selftests/bpf/prog_tests/verifier.c       |   2 +
 .../bpf/progs/verifier_mem_rdonly_untrusted.c | 136 ++++++++++++++++++
 2 files changed, 138 insertions(+)
 create mode 100644 tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/verifier_mem_rdonly_untrusted.c

diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/verifier.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/verifier.c
index cedb86d8f717..5cb49ba089d2 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/verifier.c
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/verifier.c
@@ -57,6 +57,7 @@
 #include "verifier_may_goto_1.skel.h"
 #include "verifier_may_goto_2.skel.h"
 #include "verifier_meta_access.skel.h"
+#include "verifier_mem_rdonly_untrusted.skel.h"
 #include "verifier_movsx.skel.h"
 #include "verifier_mtu.skel.h"
 #include "verifier_netfilter_ctx.skel.h"
@@ -205,6 +206,7 @@ void test_verifier_prevent_map_lookup(void)   { RUN(verifier_prevent_map_lookup)
 void test_verifier_private_stack(void)        { RUN(verifier_private_stack); }
 void test_verifier_raw_stack(void)            { RUN(verifier_raw_stack); }
 void test_verifier_raw_tp_writable(void)      { RUN(verifier_raw_tp_writable); }
+void test_verifier_mem_rdonly_untrusted(void) { RUN_FULL_CAPS(verifier_mem_rdonly_untrusted); }
 void test_verifier_reg_equal(void)            { RUN(verifier_reg_equal); }
 void test_verifier_ref_tracking(void)         { RUN(verifier_ref_tracking); }
 void test_verifier_regalloc(void)             { RUN(verifier_regalloc); }
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/verifier_mem_rdonly_untrusted.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/verifier_mem_rdonly_untrusted.c
new file mode 100644
index 000000000000..00604755e698
--- /dev/null
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/verifier_mem_rdonly_untrusted.c
@@ -0,0 +1,136 @@
+// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0
+
+#include <vmlinux.h>
+#include <bpf/bpf_core_read.h>
+#include "bpf_misc.h"
+#include "../test_kmods/bpf_testmod_kfunc.h"
+
+SEC("socket")
+__success
+__retval(0)
+int ldx_is_ok_bad_addr(void *ctx)
+{
+	char *p;
+
+	if (!bpf_core_enum_value_exists(enum bpf_features, BPF_FEAT_RDONLY_CAST_TO_VOID))
+		return 42;
+
+	p = bpf_rdonly_cast(0, 0);
+	return p[0x7fff];
+}
+
+SEC("socket")
+__success
+__retval(1)
+int ldx_is_ok_good_addr(void *ctx)
+{
+	int v, *p;
+
+	v = 1;
+	p = bpf_rdonly_cast(&v, 0);
+	return *p;
+}
+
+SEC("socket")
+__success
+int offset_not_tracked(void *ctx)
+{
+	int *p, i, s;
+
+	p = bpf_rdonly_cast(0, 0);
+	s = 0;
+	bpf_for(i, 0, 1000 * 1000 * 1000) {
+		p++;
+		s += *p;
+	}
+	return s;
+}
+
+SEC("socket")
+__failure
+__msg("cannot write into rdonly_untrusted_mem")
+int stx_not_ok(void *ctx)
+{
+	int v, *p;
+
+	v = 1;
+	p = bpf_rdonly_cast(&v, 0);
+	*p = 1;
+	return 0;
+}
+
+SEC("socket")
+__failure
+__msg("cannot write into rdonly_untrusted_mem")
+int atomic_not_ok(void *ctx)
+{
+	int v, *p;
+
+	v = 1;
+	p = bpf_rdonly_cast(&v, 0);
+	__sync_fetch_and_add(p, 1);
+	return 0;
+}
+
+SEC("socket")
+__failure
+__msg("cannot write into rdonly_untrusted_mem")
+int atomic_rmw_not_ok(void *ctx)
+{
+	long v, *p;
+
+	v = 1;
+	p = bpf_rdonly_cast(&v, 0);
+	return __sync_val_compare_and_swap(p, 0, 42);
+}
+
+SEC("socket")
+__failure
+__msg("invalid access to memory, mem_size=0 off=0 size=4")
+__msg("R1 min value is outside of the allowed memory range")
+int kfunc_param_not_ok(void *ctx)
+{
+	int *p;
+
+	p = bpf_rdonly_cast(0, 0);
+	bpf_kfunc_trusted_num_test(p);
+	return 0;
+}
+
+SEC("?fentry.s/" SYS_PREFIX "sys_getpgid")
+__failure
+__msg("R1 type=rdonly_untrusted_mem expected=")
+int helper_param_not_ok(void *ctx)
+{
+	char *p;
+
+	p = bpf_rdonly_cast(0, 0);
+	/*
+	 * Any helper with ARG_CONST_SIZE_OR_ZERO constraint will do,
+	 * the most permissive constraint
+	 */
+	bpf_copy_from_user(p, 0, (void *)42);
+	return 0;
+}
+
+static __noinline u64 *get_some_addr(void)
+{
+	if (bpf_get_prandom_u32())
+		return bpf_rdonly_cast(0, bpf_core_type_id_kernel(struct sock));
+	else
+		return bpf_rdonly_cast(0, 0);
+}
+
+SEC("socket")
+__success
+__retval(0)
+int mixed_mem_type(void *ctx)
+{
+	u64 *p;
+
+	/* Try to avoid compiler hoisting load to if branches by using __noinline func. */
+	p = get_some_addr();
+	return *p;
+}
+
+char _license[] SEC("license") = "GPL";
-- 
2.47.1


      parent reply	other threads:[~2025-06-24 19:10 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2025-06-24 19:10 [PATCH bpf-next v1 0/4] bpf: allow void* cast using bpf_rdonly_cast() Eduard Zingerman
2025-06-24 19:10 ` [PATCH bpf-next v1 1/4] " Eduard Zingerman
2025-06-24 19:10 ` [PATCH bpf-next v1 2/4] bpf: add bpf_features enum Eduard Zingerman
2025-06-24 21:59   ` Alexei Starovoitov
2025-06-24 22:07     ` Eduard Zingerman
2025-06-24 19:10 ` [PATCH bpf-next v1 3/4] selftests/bpf: allow tests from verifier.c not to drop CAP_SYS_ADMIN Eduard Zingerman
2025-06-24 21:55   ` Alexei Starovoitov
2025-06-24 22:05     ` Eduard Zingerman
2025-06-24 23:31     ` Eduard Zingerman
2025-06-25  0:04       ` Alexei Starovoitov
2025-06-24 19:10 ` Eduard Zingerman [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20250624191009.902874-5-eddyz87@gmail.com \
    --to=eddyz87@gmail.com \
    --cc=andrii@kernel.org \
    --cc=ast@kernel.org \
    --cc=bpf@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=daniel@iogearbox.net \
    --cc=kernel-team@fb.com \
    --cc=martin.lau@linux.dev \
    --cc=yonghong.song@linux.dev \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.