All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Qingfang Deng <dqfext@gmail.com>
To: Andrew Lunn <andrew+netdev@lunn.ch>,
	"David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
	Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>,
	Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>, Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com>,
	linux-ppp@vger.kernel.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Guillaume Nault <gnault@redhat.com>
Subject: [PATCH net-next 3/3] ppp: synchronize netstats updates
Date: Wed, 25 Jun 2025 11:40:20 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20250625034021.3650359-4-dqfext@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250625034021.3650359-1-dqfext@gmail.com>

The PPP receive path can now run concurrently across CPUs (after converting
rlock to rwlock in an earlier patch). This may lead to data races on
net_device->stats.

Convert all stats updates in both transmit and receive paths to use the
DEV_STATS_INC() macro, which updates stats atomically.

Signed-off-by: Qingfang Deng <dqfext@gmail.com>
---
 drivers/net/ppp/ppp_generic.c | 18 +++++++++---------
 1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/net/ppp/ppp_generic.c b/drivers/net/ppp/ppp_generic.c
index f0f8a75e3aef..4e787d1823c1 100644
--- a/drivers/net/ppp/ppp_generic.c
+++ b/drivers/net/ppp/ppp_generic.c
@@ -1478,7 +1478,7 @@ ppp_start_xmit(struct sk_buff *skb, struct net_device *dev)
 
  outf:
 	kfree_skb(skb);
-	++dev->stats.tx_dropped;
+	DEV_STATS_INC(dev, tx_dropped);
 	return NETDEV_TX_OK;
 }
 
@@ -1851,7 +1851,7 @@ ppp_send_frame(struct ppp *ppp, struct sk_buff *skb)
 
  drop:
 	kfree_skb(skb);
-	++ppp->dev->stats.tx_errors;
+	DEV_STATS_INC(ppp->dev, tx_errors);
 }
 
 /*
@@ -2134,7 +2134,7 @@ static int ppp_mp_explode(struct ppp *ppp, struct sk_buff *skb)
 	spin_unlock(&pch->downl);
 	if (ppp->debug & 1)
 		netdev_err(ppp->dev, "PPP: no memory (fragment)\n");
-	++ppp->dev->stats.tx_errors;
+	DEV_STATS_INC(ppp->dev, tx_errors);
 	++ppp->nxseq;
 	return 1;	/* abandon the frame */
 }
@@ -2296,7 +2296,7 @@ ppp_input(struct ppp_channel *chan, struct sk_buff *skb)
 	if (!ppp_decompress_proto(skb)) {
 		kfree_skb(skb);
 		if (pch->ppp) {
-			++pch->ppp->dev->stats.rx_length_errors;
+			DEV_STATS_INC(pch->ppp->dev, rx_length_errors);
 			ppp_receive_error(pch->ppp);
 		}
 		goto done;
@@ -2367,7 +2367,7 @@ ppp_receive_frame(struct ppp *ppp, struct sk_buff *skb, struct channel *pch)
 static void
 ppp_receive_error(struct ppp *ppp)
 {
-	++ppp->dev->stats.rx_errors;
+	DEV_STATS_INC(ppp->dev, rx_errors);
 	if (ppp->vj)
 		slhc_toss(ppp->vj);
 }
@@ -2634,7 +2634,7 @@ ppp_receive_mp_frame(struct ppp *ppp, struct sk_buff *skb, struct channel *pch)
 	 */
 	if (seq_before(seq, ppp->nextseq)) {
 		kfree_skb(skb);
-		++ppp->dev->stats.rx_dropped;
+		DEV_STATS_INC(ppp->dev, rx_dropped);
 		ppp_receive_error(ppp);
 		return;
 	}
@@ -2670,7 +2670,7 @@ ppp_receive_mp_frame(struct ppp *ppp, struct sk_buff *skb, struct channel *pch)
 		if (pskb_may_pull(skb, 2))
 			ppp_receive_nonmp_frame(ppp, skb);
 		else {
-			++ppp->dev->stats.rx_length_errors;
+			DEV_STATS_INC(ppp->dev, rx_length_errors);
 			kfree_skb(skb);
 			ppp_receive_error(ppp);
 		}
@@ -2776,7 +2776,7 @@ ppp_mp_reconstruct(struct ppp *ppp)
 		if (lost == 0 && (PPP_MP_CB(p)->BEbits & E) &&
 		    (PPP_MP_CB(head)->BEbits & B)) {
 			if (len > ppp->mrru + 2) {
-				++ppp->dev->stats.rx_length_errors;
+				DEV_STATS_INC(ppp->dev, rx_length_errors);
 				netdev_printk(KERN_DEBUG, ppp->dev,
 					      "PPP: reconstructed packet"
 					      " is too long (%d)\n", len);
@@ -2831,7 +2831,7 @@ ppp_mp_reconstruct(struct ppp *ppp)
 					      "  missed pkts %u..%u\n",
 					      ppp->nextseq,
 					      PPP_MP_CB(head)->sequence-1);
-			++ppp->dev->stats.rx_dropped;
+			DEV_STATS_INC(ppp->dev, rx_dropped);
 			ppp_receive_error(ppp);
 		}
 
-- 
2.43.0


  parent reply	other threads:[~2025-06-25  3:40 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2025-06-25  3:40 [PATCH net-next 0/3] ppp: improve receive path performance Qingfang Deng
2025-06-25  3:40 ` [PATCH net-next 1/3] ppp: convert rlock to rwlock to improve RX concurrency Qingfang Deng
2025-06-25  8:11   ` Andrew Lunn
2025-06-26 16:23   ` Guillaume Nault
2025-06-27  3:58     ` Qingfang Deng
2025-06-27  6:44       ` Eric Dumazet
2025-06-27  9:23         ` Qingfang Deng
2025-06-25  3:40 ` [PATCH net-next 2/3] pppoe: bypass sk_receive_skb for PPPOX_BOUND sockets Qingfang Deng
2025-06-25  3:40 ` Qingfang Deng [this message]
2025-06-25  8:16   ` [PATCH net-next 3/3] ppp: synchronize netstats updates Andrew Lunn

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20250625034021.3650359-4-dqfext@gmail.com \
    --to=dqfext@gmail.com \
    --cc=andrew+netdev@lunn.ch \
    --cc=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=edumazet@google.com \
    --cc=gnault@redhat.com \
    --cc=kuba@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-ppp@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.