Re: [PATCH] rust: simplify `Adapter::id_info`

[Onur <work@onurozkan.dev>]

On Wed, 25 Jun 2025 10:22:48 +0200
Danilo Krummrich <dakr@kernel.org> wrote:

> On Wed, Jun 25, 2025 at 07:36:30AM +0300, Onur Özkan wrote:
> > It was obviously unnecessary to check if `id` is `Some`.
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Onur Özkan <work@onurozkan.dev>
> > ---
> >  rust/kernel/driver.rs | 7 +------
> >  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 6 deletions(-)
> > 
> > diff --git a/rust/kernel/driver.rs b/rust/kernel/driver.rs
> > index ec9166cedfa7..1036755cb27d 100644
> > --- a/rust/kernel/driver.rs
> > +++ b/rust/kernel/driver.rs
> > @@ -178,11 +178,6 @@ fn of_id_info(_dev: &device::Device) ->
> > Option<&'static Self::IdInfo> { /// If this returns `None`, it
> > means that there is no match in any of the ID tables directly ///
> > associated with a [`device::Device`]. fn id_info(dev:
> > &device::Device) -> Option<&'static Self::IdInfo> {
> > -        let id = Self::of_id_info(dev);
> > -        if id.is_some() {
> > -            return id;
> > -        }
> > -
> > -        None
> 
> This was intentional, since I anticipated we'll get [1] eventually. :)
> 
> [1]
> https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20250620153914.295679-1-igor.korotin.linux@gmail.com/
> 
> > +        Self::of_id_info(dev)
> >      }
> >  }
> > --
> > 2.50.0
> > 

Even with that, it can be something like this:

fn id_info(dev: &device::Device) -> Option<&'static Self::IdInfo> {
    let id = Self::acpi_id_info(dev);
    if id.is_some() {
        return id;
    }

    Self::of_id_info(dev)
}

or maybe even this:

fn id_info(dev: &device::Device) -> Option<&'static Self::IdInfo> {
    Self::acpi_id_info(dev).or_else(|| Self::of_id_info(dev))
}