From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (aws-us-west-2-korg-mail-1.web.codeaurora.org [10.30.226.201]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 114682F1FCE; Thu, 26 Jun 2025 18:29:55 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1750962596; cv=none; b=HThAFsVy2P4ds2I65PEpAfFQ1ofUOExzSSQ1XGyvBuRyNOuCzDrgjj9Pj7lec8bnJPWX2UhIeXnou7sPIp+4Zf04+LXw8EdtLhOaQLzvi5c/2eihyB2CukmCgRpYocnXU6/fRFTgtlNyYtgqEFJFPbmWuR5p6QIT6v0n4yGbteI= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1750962596; c=relaxed/simple; bh=TtyXTqZHS7WMCX37CORNs51o3WK6Gt83ngInIItezg8=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:In-Reply-To:References: MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=VownYtsXBWRQVpWCaQUYrD+ltKOyWvFGzICzilxewt3DO/qyUxx2lWRPZgj+sdpQy1zm3E+6LtRmHfDX18gQ+6rQJj6EzltB2wcW/MH7ocj1YwsWX2g6Z+3h3z6Ej9YpGvu7pgg168+wNSyc68VuyP8c3Oht4OXG4T29nxiSdXY= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b=c7GFK1a1; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b="c7GFK1a1" Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 051E4C4CEEB; Thu, 26 Jun 2025 18:29:54 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=k20201202; t=1750962595; bh=TtyXTqZHS7WMCX37CORNs51o3WK6Gt83ngInIItezg8=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=c7GFK1a1t9dBNPzGktr/+eb67PkxOiElidnZ6I1BZmYRVIP9Wf8ipLIWyboXhAbTy fixal4soaaTKK0kHVAXftqWAdi+FOP3Tj3yBZXiw4VYjj9yUGPsQ2H9s2sPib+B0nL OCFZzQ9TLb43FPlqlTEPkmDu+SwQIVLEez3pQRH5tNWyMRPgENeKDU2jAVe2INgbqM AuGpM4Gwj+rLkvSOpasjJZi8zXUNRtvtNRGwQNDE5ea6OZDY6HW7wKUvNshUKTKaM4 WT1DPqiKdGbBqEPXS5MH7OsdBJC2h6TTKlzk1RbhX3Qev9D2tf2TsxtLhoCjF1FCXz 7cqTMPSjEtTuQ== Date: Thu, 26 Jun 2025 11:29:54 -0700 From: Jakub Kicinski To: Oleksij Rempel Cc: Woojung Huh , Simon Horman , Thangaraj Samynathan , netdev@vger.kernel.org, Phil Elwell , Russell King , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Andrew Lunn , Eric Dumazet , kernel@pengutronix.de, Rengarajan Sundararajan , Maxime Chevallier , Paolo Abeni , "David S. Miller" , UNGLinuxDriver@microchip.com Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v1 1/1] net: usb: lan78xx: fix WARN in __netif_napi_del_locked on disconnect Message-ID: <20250626112954.5987f2e9@kernel.org> In-Reply-To: References: <20250620085144.1858723-1-o.rempel@pengutronix.de> <20250623165537.53558fdb@kernel.org> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: netdev@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On Thu, 26 Jun 2025 12:18:29 +0200 Oleksij Rempel wrote: > > > This patch is intended for `net-next` since the issue existed before the > > > PHYLINK migration, but is more naturally and cleanly addressed now that > > > PHYLINK manages link state transitions. > > > > And repost that for net, please.. :) > > It will be not compatible with the PHYlink migration patch in the > net-next. Should i wait until PHYlink patch goes to the net and then > send different patch variants for stable before PHYlink migration and > after? The conflict will be relatively easy, we will have to cope. But you really, really should hold off net-next patches until you fix all the pre-existing bugs :|