From: "Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@mit.edu>
To: bugzilla-daemon@kernel.org
Cc: linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [Bug 220288] New: A typo Leads to loss of all data on disk
Date: Fri, 27 Jun 2025 22:48:37 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20250628024837.GC4253@mit.edu> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <bug-220288-13602@https.bugzilla.kernel.org/>
I don't see how that happened. /dev/sdc has a partition table at the
beginning of the disk. That partition table contains the definition
of /dev/sdc1.
So if you ran "fsck.ext4 /dev/sdc" instead of "fsck.ext4 /dev/sdc1",
you should have gotten something like this:
root@xfstests:~# fsck.ext4 /dev/sdb
e2fsck 1.47.2-rc1 (28-Nov-2024)
ext2fs_open2: Bad magic number in super-block
fsck.ext4: Superblock invalid, trying backup blocks...
fsck.ext4: Bad magic number in super-block while trying to open /dev/sdb
The superblock could not be read or does not describe a valid ext2/ext3/ext4
filesystem. If the device is valid and it really contains an ext2/ext3/ext4
filesystem (and not swap or ufs or something else), then the superblock
is corrupt, and you might try running e2fsck with an alternate superblock:
e2fsck -b 8193 <device>
or
e2fsck -b 32768 <device>
Found a gpt partition table in /dev/sdb
In any case, fsck.ext4 will not make any changes unless you give it
permission by answering "yes". For example (do not try this at home,
kids):
root@xfstests:~# debugfs -w -R "clri <2>" /dev/sdb1 ; debugfs -w -R "ssv state 2" /dev/sdb1
debugfs 1.47.2-rc1 (28-Nov-2024)
debugfs 1.47.2-rc1 (28-Nov-2024)
root@xfstests:~# fsck.ext4 /dev/sdb1
e2fsck 1.47.2-rc1 (28-Nov-2024)
/dev/sdb1 contains a file system with errors, check forced.
Pass 1: Checking inodes, blocks, and sizes
Root inode is not a directory. Clear<y>? yes
Pass 2: Checking directory structure
Entry '..' in <2>/<11> (11) has deleted/unused inode 2. Clear<y>? yes
Pass 3: Checking directory connectivity
Root inode not allocated. Allocate<y>? yes
Unconnected directory inode 11 (was in /)
Connect to /lost+found<y>? yes
/lost+found not found. Create<y>? yes
Pass 3A: Optimizing directories
Pass 4: Checking reference counts
Inode 11 ref count is 3, should be 2. Fix<y>? yes
Pass 5: Checking group summary information
/dev/sdb1: ***** FILE SYSTEM WAS MODIFIED *****
/dev/sdb1: 13/655360 files (0.0% non-contiguous), 67263/2620928 blocks
See how fsck.ext4 asks for permission before it makes any change to
the filesystem?
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-06-28 2:48 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-06-27 22:22 [Bug 220288] New: A typo Leads to loss of all data on disk bugzilla-daemon
2025-06-28 2:48 ` Theodore Ts'o [this message]
2025-06-28 2:48 ` [Bug 220288] " bugzilla-daemon
2025-06-28 8:47 ` bugzilla-daemon
2025-06-28 8:57 ` bugzilla-daemon
2025-06-28 9:37 ` bugzilla-daemon
2025-06-28 21:32 ` bugzilla-daemon
2025-06-28 21:39 ` bugzilla-daemon
2025-07-02 19:36 ` bugzilla-daemon
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20250628024837.GC4253@mit.edu \
--to=tytso@mit.edu \
--cc=bugzilla-daemon@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.