From: Dev Jain <dev.jain@arm.com>
To: akpm@linux-foundation.org
Cc: ryan.roberts@arm.com, david@redhat.com, willy@infradead.org,
linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
catalin.marinas@arm.com, will@kernel.org,
Liam.Howlett@oracle.com, lorenzo.stoakes@oracle.com,
vbabka@suse.cz, jannh@google.com, anshuman.khandual@arm.com,
peterx@redhat.com, joey.gouly@arm.com, ioworker0@gmail.com,
baohua@kernel.org, kevin.brodsky@arm.com,
quic_zhenhuah@quicinc.com, christophe.leroy@csgroup.eu,
yangyicong@hisilicon.com, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
hughd@google.com, yang@os.amperecomputing.com, ziy@nvidia.com,
Dev Jain <dev.jain@arm.com>
Subject: [PATCH v4 0/4] Optimize mprotect() for large folios
Date: Sat, 28 Jun 2025 17:04:31 +0530 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20250628113435.46678-1-dev.jain@arm.com> (raw)
This patchset optimizes the mprotect() system call for large folios
by PTE-batching. No issues were observed with mm-selftests, build
tested on x86_64.
We use the following test cases to measure performance, mprotect()'ing
the mapped memory to read-only then read-write 40 times:
Test case 1: Mapping 1G of memory, touching it to get PMD-THPs, then
pte-mapping those THPs
Test case 2: Mapping 1G of memory with 64K mTHPs
Test case 3: Mapping 1G of memory with 4K pages
Average execution time on arm64, Apple M3:
Before the patchset:
T1: 7.9 seconds T2: 7.9 seconds T3: 4.2 seconds
After the patchset:
T1: 2.1 seconds T2: 2.2 seconds T3: 4.3 seconds
Observing T1/T2 and T3 before the patchset, we also remove the regression
introduced by ptep_get() on a contpte block. And, for large folios we get
an almost 74% performance improvement, albeit the trade-off being a slight
degradation in the small folio case.
Here is the test program:
#define _GNU_SOURCE
#include <sys/mman.h>
#include <stdlib.h>
#include <string.h>
#include <stdio.h>
#include <unistd.h>
#define SIZE (1024*1024*1024)
unsigned long pmdsize = (1UL << 21);
unsigned long pagesize = (1UL << 12);
static void pte_map_thps(char *mem, size_t size)
{
size_t offs;
int ret = 0;
/* PTE-map each THP by temporarily splitting the VMAs. */
for (offs = 0; offs < size; offs += pmdsize) {
ret |= madvise(mem + offs, pagesize, MADV_DONTFORK);
ret |= madvise(mem + offs, pagesize, MADV_DOFORK);
}
if (ret) {
fprintf(stderr, "ERROR: mprotect() failed\n");
exit(1);
}
}
int main(int argc, char *argv[])
{
char *p;
int ret = 0;
p = mmap((1UL << 30), SIZE, PROT_READ | PROT_WRITE, MAP_PRIVATE | MAP_ANONYMOUS, -1, 0);
if (p != (1UL << 30)) {
perror("mmap");
return 1;
}
memset(p, 0, SIZE);
if (madvise(p, SIZE, MADV_NOHUGEPAGE))
perror("madvise");
explicit_bzero(p, SIZE);
pte_map_thps(p, SIZE);
for (int loops = 0; loops < 40; loops++) {
if (mprotect(p, SIZE, PROT_READ))
perror("mprotect"), exit(1);
if (mprotect(p, SIZE, PROT_READ|PROT_WRITE))
perror("mprotect"), exit(1);
explicit_bzero(p, SIZE);
}
}
---
The patchset is rebased onto Saturday's mm-new.
v3->v4:
- Refactor skipping logic into a new function, edit patch 1 subject
to highlight it is only for MM_CP_PROT_NUMA case (David H)
- Refactor the optimization logic, add more documentation to the generic
batched functions, do not add clear_flush_ptes, squash patch 4
and 5 (Ryan)
v2->v3:
- Add comments for the new APIs (Ryan, Lorenzo)
- Instead of refactoring, use a "skip_batch" label
- Move arm64 patches at the end (Ryan)
- In can_change_pte_writable(), check AnonExclusive page-by-page (David H)
- Resolve implicit declaration; tested build on x86 (Lance Yang)
v1->v2:
- Rebase onto mm-unstable (6ebffe676fcf: util_macros.h: make the header more resilient)
- Abridge the anon-exclusive condition (Lance Yang)
Dev Jain (4):
mm: Optimize mprotect() for MM_CP_PROT_NUMA by batch-skipping PTEs
mm: Add batched versions of ptep_modify_prot_start/commit
mm: Optimize mprotect() by PTE-batching
arm64: Add batched versions of ptep_modify_prot_start/commit
arch/arm64/include/asm/pgtable.h | 10 ++
arch/arm64/mm/mmu.c | 28 +++-
include/linux/pgtable.h | 83 +++++++++-
mm/mprotect.c | 269 +++++++++++++++++++++++--------
4 files changed, 315 insertions(+), 75 deletions(-)
--
2.30.2
next reply other threads:[~2025-06-28 11:37 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 62+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-06-28 11:34 Dev Jain [this message]
2025-06-28 11:34 ` [PATCH v4 1/4] mm: Optimize mprotect() for MM_CP_PROT_NUMA by batch-skipping PTEs Dev Jain
2025-06-30 9:42 ` Ryan Roberts
2025-06-30 9:49 ` Dev Jain
2025-06-30 9:55 ` Ryan Roberts
2025-06-30 10:05 ` Dev Jain
2025-06-30 11:25 ` Lorenzo Stoakes
2025-06-30 11:39 ` Ryan Roberts
2025-06-30 11:53 ` Lorenzo Stoakes
2025-06-30 11:40 ` Dev Jain
2025-06-30 11:51 ` Lorenzo Stoakes
2025-06-30 11:56 ` Dev Jain
2025-07-02 9:37 ` Lorenzo Stoakes
2025-07-02 15:01 ` Dev Jain
2025-07-02 15:37 ` Lorenzo Stoakes
2025-06-28 11:34 ` [PATCH v4 2/4] mm: Add batched versions of ptep_modify_prot_start/commit Dev Jain
2025-06-30 10:10 ` Ryan Roberts
2025-06-30 10:17 ` Dev Jain
2025-06-30 10:35 ` Ryan Roberts
2025-06-30 10:42 ` Dev Jain
2025-06-30 12:57 ` Lorenzo Stoakes
2025-07-01 4:44 ` Dev Jain
2025-07-01 7:33 ` Ryan Roberts
2025-07-01 8:06 ` Lorenzo Stoakes
2025-07-01 8:23 ` Ryan Roberts
2025-07-01 8:34 ` Lorenzo Stoakes
2025-06-28 11:34 ` [PATCH v4 3/4] mm: Optimize mprotect() by PTE-batching Dev Jain
2025-06-28 12:39 ` Dev Jain
2025-06-30 10:31 ` Ryan Roberts
2025-06-30 11:21 ` Dev Jain
2025-06-30 11:47 ` Dev Jain
2025-06-30 11:50 ` Ryan Roberts
2025-06-30 11:53 ` Dev Jain
2025-07-01 5:47 ` Dev Jain
2025-07-01 7:39 ` Ryan Roberts
2025-06-30 12:52 ` Lorenzo Stoakes
2025-07-01 5:30 ` Dev Jain
2025-07-01 8:03 ` Ryan Roberts
2025-07-01 8:06 ` Dev Jain
2025-07-01 8:24 ` Ryan Roberts
2025-07-01 8:15 ` Lorenzo Stoakes
2025-07-01 8:30 ` Ryan Roberts
2025-07-01 8:51 ` Lorenzo Stoakes
2025-07-01 9:53 ` Ryan Roberts
2025-07-01 10:21 ` Lorenzo Stoakes
2025-07-01 11:31 ` Ryan Roberts
2025-07-01 13:40 ` Lorenzo Stoakes
2025-07-02 10:32 ` Lorenzo Stoakes
2025-07-02 15:03 ` Dev Jain
2025-07-02 15:22 ` Lorenzo Stoakes
2025-07-03 12:59 ` David Hildenbrand
2025-06-28 11:34 ` [PATCH v4 4/4] arm64: Add batched versions of ptep_modify_prot_start/commit Dev Jain
2025-06-30 10:43 ` Ryan Roberts
2025-06-29 23:05 ` [PATCH v4 0/4] Optimize mprotect() for large folios Andrew Morton
2025-06-30 3:33 ` Dev Jain
2025-06-30 10:45 ` Ryan Roberts
2025-06-30 11:22 ` Dev Jain
2025-06-30 11:17 ` Lorenzo Stoakes
2025-06-30 11:25 ` Dev Jain
2025-06-30 11:27 ` Lorenzo Stoakes
2025-06-30 11:43 ` Dev Jain
2025-07-01 0:08 ` Andrew Morton
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20250628113435.46678-1-dev.jain@arm.com \
--to=dev.jain@arm.com \
--cc=Liam.Howlett@oracle.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=anshuman.khandual@arm.com \
--cc=baohua@kernel.org \
--cc=catalin.marinas@arm.com \
--cc=christophe.leroy@csgroup.eu \
--cc=david@redhat.com \
--cc=hughd@google.com \
--cc=ioworker0@gmail.com \
--cc=jannh@google.com \
--cc=joey.gouly@arm.com \
--cc=kevin.brodsky@arm.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=lorenzo.stoakes@oracle.com \
--cc=peterx@redhat.com \
--cc=quic_zhenhuah@quicinc.com \
--cc=ryan.roberts@arm.com \
--cc=vbabka@suse.cz \
--cc=will@kernel.org \
--cc=willy@infradead.org \
--cc=yang@os.amperecomputing.com \
--cc=yangyicong@hisilicon.com \
--cc=ziy@nvidia.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.