From: "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@redhat.com>
To: Jason Wang <jasowang@redhat.com>
Cc: xuanzhuo@linux.alibaba.com, eperezma@redhat.com,
virtualization@lists.linux.dev, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH V3 14/19] virtio_ring: determine descriptor flags at one time
Date: Tue, 1 Jul 2025 02:42:35 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20250701023157-mutt-send-email-mst@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250616082518.10411-15-jasowang@redhat.com>
On Mon, Jun 16, 2025 at 04:25:12PM +0800, Jason Wang wrote:
> Let's determine the last descriptor by counting the number of sg. This
> would be consistent with packed virtqueue implementation and ease the
> future in-order implementation.
>
> Reviewed-by: Xuan Zhuo <xuanzhuo@linux.alibaba.com>
> Signed-off-by: Jason Wang <jasowang@redhat.com>
> ---
> drivers/virtio/virtio_ring.c | 25 +++++++++++++------------
> 1 file changed, 13 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/virtio/virtio_ring.c b/drivers/virtio/virtio_ring.c
> index af32d1a1a1db..d5e4d4cd2487 100644
> --- a/drivers/virtio/virtio_ring.c
> +++ b/drivers/virtio/virtio_ring.c
> @@ -570,7 +570,7 @@ static inline int virtqueue_add_split(struct vring_virtqueue *vq,
> struct vring_desc_extra *extra;
> struct scatterlist *sg;
> struct vring_desc *desc;
> - unsigned int i, n, avail, descs_used, prev, err_idx;
> + unsigned int i, n, c, avail, descs_used, err_idx;
> int head;
> bool indirect;
>
> @@ -626,46 +626,47 @@ static inline int virtqueue_add_split(struct vring_virtqueue *vq,
> return -ENOSPC;
> }
>
> + c = 0;
initialize at point of declaration?
> for (n = 0; n < out_sgs; n++) {
> + sg = sgs[n];
> for (sg = sgs[n]; sg; sg = sg_next(sg)) {
> dma_addr_t addr;
> u32 len;
> + u16 flags = 0;
>
> if (vring_map_one_sg(vq, sg, DMA_TO_DEVICE, &addr, &len, premapped))
> goto unmap_release;
>
> - prev = i;
> + if (++c != total_sg)
> + flags = VRING_DESC_F_NEXT;
> +
Don't like it how the logic is split.
flags isn't used before that.
So I prefer:
flags = ++c == total_sg ? 0 : VRING_DESC_F_NEXT;
and at that point, we do not really need flags anymore:
> /* Note that we trust indirect descriptor
> * table since it use stream DMA mapping.
> */
> i = virtqueue_add_desc_split(vq, desc, extra, i, addr, len,
> - VRING_DESC_F_NEXT,
> + flags,
So just:
i = virtqueue_add_desc_split(vq, desc, extra, i, addr, len,
++c == total_sg ? 0 : VRING_DESC_F_NEXT,
here and we are done.
> premapped);
> }
> }
> for (; n < (out_sgs + in_sgs); n++) {
> for (sg = sgs[n]; sg; sg = sg_next(sg)) {
> + u16 flags = VRING_DESC_F_WRITE;
> dma_addr_t addr;
> u32 len;
>
> if (vring_map_one_sg(vq, sg, DMA_FROM_DEVICE, &addr, &len, premapped))
> goto unmap_release;
>
> - prev = i;
> + if (++c != total_sg)
> + flags |= VRING_DESC_F_NEXT;
> +
Don't like it that above it's "=" here it is "|=".
And flags isn't used before that.
So I prefer:
flags = ++c == total_sg ? VRING_DESC_F_WRITE : VRING_DESC_F_WRITE | VRING_DESC_F_NEXT;
and again we don't really need the variable:
> /* Note that we trust indirect descriptor
> * table since it use stream DMA mapping.
> */
> i = virtqueue_add_desc_split(vq, desc, extra, i, addr, len,
> - VRING_DESC_F_NEXT |
> - VRING_DESC_F_WRITE,
so just:
i = virtqueue_add_desc_split(vq, desc, extra, i, addr, len,
(++c == total_sg ? 0 : VRING_DESC_F_NEXT) |
VRING_DESC_F_WRITE,
is clearer, and the patch smaller.
> - premapped);
> + flags, premapped);
> }
> }
> - /* Last one doesn't continue. */
> - desc[prev].flags &= cpu_to_virtio16(vq->vq.vdev, ~VRING_DESC_F_NEXT);
> - if (!indirect && vring_need_unmap_buffer(vq, &extra[prev]))
> - vq->split.desc_extra[prev & (vq->split.vring.num - 1)].flags &=
> - ~VRING_DESC_F_NEXT;
>
> if (indirect) {
> /* Now that the indirect table is filled in, map it. */
> --
> 2.34.1
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-07-01 6:42 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 35+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-06-16 8:24 [PATCH V3 00/19] virtio_ring in order support Jason Wang
2025-06-16 8:24 ` [PATCH V3 01/19] virtio_ring: rename virtqueue_reinit_xxx to virtqueue_reset_xxx() Jason Wang
2025-06-24 10:35 ` Lei Yang
2025-06-16 8:25 ` [PATCH V3 02/19] virtio_ring: switch to use vring_virtqueue in virtqueue_poll variants Jason Wang
2025-06-16 8:25 ` [PATCH V3 03/19] virtio_ring: unify logic of virtqueue_poll() and more_used() Jason Wang
2025-06-16 8:25 ` [PATCH V3 04/19] virtio_ring: switch to use vring_virtqueue for virtqueue resize variants Jason Wang
2025-06-16 8:25 ` [PATCH V3 05/19] virtio_ring: switch to use vring_virtqueue for virtqueue_kick_prepare variants Jason Wang
2025-06-16 8:25 ` [PATCH V3 06/19] virtio_ring: switch to use vring_virtqueue for virtqueue_add variants Jason Wang
2025-06-16 8:25 ` [PATCH V3 07/19] virtio: " Jason Wang
2025-06-16 8:25 ` [PATCH V3 08/19] virtio_ring: switch to use vring_virtqueue for enable_cb_prepare variants Jason Wang
2025-06-16 8:25 ` [PATCH V3 09/19] virtio_ring: use vring_virtqueue for enable_cb_delayed variants Jason Wang
2025-06-16 8:25 ` [PATCH V3 10/19] virtio_ring: switch to use vring_virtqueue for disable_cb variants Jason Wang
2025-06-16 8:25 ` [PATCH V3 11/19] virtio_ring: switch to use vring_virtqueue for detach_unused_buf variants Jason Wang
2025-06-16 8:25 ` [PATCH V3 12/19] virtio_ring: use u16 for last_used_idx in virtqueue_poll_split() Jason Wang
2025-06-16 8:25 ` [PATCH V3 13/19] virtio_ring: introduce virtqueue ops Jason Wang
2025-07-01 6:28 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2025-07-03 3:20 ` Jason Wang
2025-06-16 8:25 ` [PATCH V3 14/19] virtio_ring: determine descriptor flags at one time Jason Wang
2025-07-01 6:42 ` Michael S. Tsirkin [this message]
2025-07-01 7:25 ` Jason Wang
2025-06-16 8:25 ` [PATCH V3 15/19] virtio_ring: factor out core logic of buffer detaching Jason Wang
2025-06-16 8:25 ` [PATCH V3 16/19] virtio_ring: factor out core logic for updating last_used_idx Jason Wang
2025-06-16 8:25 ` [PATCH V3 17/19] virtio_ring: factor out split indirect detaching logic Jason Wang
2025-07-01 6:44 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2025-06-16 8:25 ` [PATCH V3 18/19] virtio_ring: factor out split " Jason Wang
2025-07-01 6:45 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2025-06-16 8:25 ` [PATCH V3 19/19] virtio_ring: add in order support Jason Wang
2025-07-01 6:56 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2025-07-02 9:29 ` Jason Wang
2025-07-02 10:56 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2025-07-03 3:13 ` Jason Wang
2025-07-03 13:49 ` Jonah Palmer
2025-07-07 3:28 ` Jason Wang
2025-06-17 12:29 ` [PATCH V3 00/19] virtio_ring " Eugenio Perez Martin
2025-07-01 6:58 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20250701023157-mutt-send-email-mst@kernel.org \
--to=mst@redhat.com \
--cc=eperezma@redhat.com \
--cc=jasowang@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=virtualization@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=xuanzhuo@linux.alibaba.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.