From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from frasgout.his.huawei.com (frasgout.his.huawei.com [185.176.79.56]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 721EF1DED52 for ; Tue, 1 Jul 2025 11:12:46 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=185.176.79.56 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1751368368; cv=none; b=O1vfZUEJLtHpG7d4MM9wxmMapuL0G02AAgx58qVd/M1AH6iwA9qyXgjQRaaKrDougWagOPyCnojRd77IfDrtM3aAXd8E7fq2U7zaMH50127RbXMKTMAyD9oSA3tbEwwv/F3gBDzrE6MKxoHqsOvmsAv/SngxyGTGOgXKAOMZtzA= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1751368368; c=relaxed/simple; bh=LgvztjXTcyymdScIhXwV3GRIdEcIxnEfjSMzv7XlQuU=; h=Date:From:To:CC:Subject:Message-ID:In-Reply-To:References: MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=Xj7fq3Y7XknFJ9ijjAduriAxbriWiv57Id+LMBeVp71S/DNsHaj+/f/SllECFiFeyQugrwESoFl4uO6LQvL6eOfkpWYF3K9Y7CsdifADu1UZIrYmEt1OME9wFOpokYdVrCDfoXQamiNBQMSO/MHBdxofJHDXlF99/CAZU3NPW8Y= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=quarantine dis=none) header.from=huawei.com; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=huawei.com; arc=none smtp.client-ip=185.176.79.56 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=quarantine dis=none) header.from=huawei.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=huawei.com Received: from mail.maildlp.com (unknown [172.18.186.216]) by frasgout.his.huawei.com (SkyGuard) with ESMTP id 4bWgNP3x86z6L5B0; Tue, 1 Jul 2025 19:12:21 +0800 (CST) Received: from frapeml500008.china.huawei.com (unknown [7.182.85.71]) by mail.maildlp.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 06703140373; Tue, 1 Jul 2025 19:12:44 +0800 (CST) Received: from localhost (10.203.177.66) by frapeml500008.china.huawei.com (7.182.85.71) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id 15.1.2507.39; Tue, 1 Jul 2025 13:12:43 +0200 Date: Tue, 1 Jul 2025 12:12:42 +0100 From: Jonathan Cameron To: Dave Jiang CC: , , , , , , Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 5/9] cxl/test: Add cxl_test support for new dport allocation scheme Message-ID: <20250701121242.00007738@huawei.com> In-Reply-To: <20250624213916.1665889-6-dave.jiang@intel.com> References: <20250624213916.1665889-1-dave.jiang@intel.com> <20250624213916.1665889-6-dave.jiang@intel.com> X-Mailer: Claws Mail 4.3.0 (GTK 3.24.42; x86_64-w64-mingw32) Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-cxl@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-ClientProxiedBy: lhrpeml100006.china.huawei.com (7.191.160.224) To frapeml500008.china.huawei.com (7.182.85.71) On Tue, 24 Jun 2025 14:39:12 -0700 Dave Jiang wrote: > In the delayed dport allocation scheme, the total number of dports > need to be discovered during port probe. Add the mock function > that does it for cxl_test. > > Signed-off-by: Dave Jiang I'm far from an expert on cxl_test but this looks sensible to me Reviewed-by: Jonathan Cameron