From: Leon Romanovsky <leonro@nvidia.com>
To: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
Cc: Keith Busch <kbusch@kernel.org>,
Ben Copeland <ben.copeland@linaro.org>,
<linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>, <lkft-triage@lists.linaro.org>,
<regressions@lists.linux.dev>, <linux-nvme@lists.infradead.org>,
"Dan Carpenter" <dan.carpenter@linaro.org>, <axboe@kernel.dk>,
<sagi@grimberg.me>, <iommu@lists.linux.dev>
Subject: Re: next-20250627: IOMMU DMA warning during NVMe I/O completion after 06cae0e3f61c
Date: Tue, 1 Jul 2025 18:58:10 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20250701155810.GE6278@unreal> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250701132936.GA18807@lst.de>
On Tue, Jul 01, 2025 at 03:29:36PM +0200, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 30, 2025 at 02:25:23PM -0600, Keith Busch wrote:
> > I think the PRP handling is broken. At the very least, handling the last
> > element is wrong if it appears at the end of the list, so I think we
> > need something like this:
>
> Yeah.
>
> > But even that, the PRP setup doesn't match the teardown. We're calling
> > dma_map_page() on each PRP even if consecutive PRP's came from the same
> > dma mapping segment. So even if it had been coalesced, but if the device
> > doesn't support SGLs, then it would use the prp unmap path.
>
> Yes, that's broken, and I remember fixing it before. A little digging
> shows that my fixes disappeared between the oct 30 version of Leon's
> dma-split branch and the latest one somewhere.
Oct, 30 belongs to RFC/first version of patches.
Thanks
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-07-01 15:58 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <CGME20250630075218epcas5p1f3d467fffa468cac0ccd012c193e94df@epcas5p1.samsung.com>
2025-06-30 7:50 ` next-20250627: IOMMU DMA warning during NVMe I/O completion after 06cae0e3f61c Ben Copeland
2025-06-30 13:33 ` Christoph Hellwig
2025-06-30 19:51 ` Ben Copeland
2025-07-01 19:43 ` Keith Busch
2025-06-30 20:25 ` Keith Busch
2025-07-01 0:54 ` Keith Busch
2025-07-01 13:05 ` Ben Copeland
2025-07-01 14:20 ` Keith Busch
2025-07-01 13:29 ` Christoph Hellwig
2025-07-01 15:58 ` Leon Romanovsky [this message]
2025-07-01 21:00 ` Keith Busch
2025-07-03 9:30 ` Christoph Hellwig
2025-07-03 14:29 ` Keith Busch
2025-07-03 15:13 ` Ben Copeland
2025-07-03 5:54 ` Kanchan Joshi
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20250701155810.GE6278@unreal \
--to=leonro@nvidia.com \
--cc=axboe@kernel.dk \
--cc=ben.copeland@linaro.org \
--cc=dan.carpenter@linaro.org \
--cc=hch@lst.de \
--cc=iommu@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=kbusch@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-nvme@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=lkft-triage@lists.linaro.org \
--cc=regressions@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=sagi@grimberg.me \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.