From: Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>
To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Cc: "Will Deacon" <will@kernel.org>, "Keir Fraser" <keirf@google.com>,
"Steven Moreland" <smoreland@google.com>,
"Frederick Mayle" <fmayle@google.com>,
"Stefan Hajnoczi" <stefanha@redhat.com>,
"Stefano Garzarella" <sgarzare@redhat.com>,
"Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@redhat.com>,
"Jason Wang" <jasowang@redhat.com>,
"Eugenio Pérez" <eperezma@redhat.com>,
netdev@vger.kernel.org, virtualization@lists.linux.dev
Subject: [PATCH v2 8/8] vsock/virtio: Allocate nonlinear SKBs for handling large transmit buffers
Date: Tue, 1 Jul 2025 17:45:07 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20250701164507.14883-9-will@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250701164507.14883-1-will@kernel.org>
When transmitting a vsock packet, virtio_transport_send_pkt_info() calls
virtio_transport_alloc_linear_skb() to allocate and fill SKBs with the
transmit data. Unfortunately, these are always linear allocations and
can therefore result in significant pressure on kmalloc() considering
that the maximum packet size (VIRTIO_VSOCK_MAX_PKT_BUF_SIZE +
VIRTIO_VSOCK_SKB_HEADROOM) is a little over 64KiB, resulting in a 128KiB
allocation for each packet.
Rework the vsock SKB allocation so that, for sizes with page order
greater than PAGE_ALLOC_COSTLY_ORDER, a nonlinear SKB is allocated
instead with the packet header in the SKB and the transmit data in the
fragments. No that this affects both the vhost and virtio transports.
Signed-off-by: Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>
---
net/vmw_vsock/virtio_transport_common.c | 5 +++--
1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/net/vmw_vsock/virtio_transport_common.c b/net/vmw_vsock/virtio_transport_common.c
index c9eb7f7ac00d..f74677c3511e 100644
--- a/net/vmw_vsock/virtio_transport_common.c
+++ b/net/vmw_vsock/virtio_transport_common.c
@@ -109,7 +109,8 @@ static int virtio_transport_fill_skb(struct sk_buff *skb,
return __zerocopy_sg_from_iter(info->msg, NULL, skb,
&info->msg->msg_iter, len, NULL);
- return memcpy_from_msg(skb_put(skb, len), info->msg, len);
+ virtio_vsock_skb_put(skb);
+ return skb_copy_datagram_from_iter(skb, 0, &info->msg->msg_iter, len);
}
static void virtio_transport_init_hdr(struct sk_buff *skb,
@@ -261,7 +262,7 @@ static struct sk_buff *virtio_transport_alloc_skb(struct virtio_vsock_pkt_info *
if (!zcopy)
skb_len += payload_len;
- skb = virtio_vsock_alloc_linear_skb(skb_len, GFP_KERNEL);
+ skb = virtio_vsock_alloc_skb(skb_len, GFP_KERNEL);
if (!skb)
return NULL;
--
2.50.0.727.gbf7dc18ff4-goog
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-07-01 16:45 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 21+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-07-01 16:44 [PATCH v2 0/8] vsock/virtio: SKB allocation improvements Will Deacon
2025-07-01 16:45 ` [PATCH v2 1/8] vhost/vsock: Avoid allocating arbitrarily-sized SKBs Will Deacon
2025-07-01 16:45 ` [PATCH v2 2/8] vsock/virtio: Validate length in packet header before skb_put() Will Deacon
2025-07-01 16:45 ` [PATCH v2 3/8] vsock/virtio: Move length check to callers of virtio_vsock_skb_rx_put() Will Deacon
2025-07-02 16:28 ` Stefano Garzarella
2025-07-13 21:26 ` Will Deacon
2025-07-01 16:45 ` [PATCH v2 4/8] vsock/virtio: Resize receive buffers so that each SKB fits in a page Will Deacon
2025-07-01 19:14 ` David Laight
2025-07-02 13:16 ` Stefano Garzarella
2025-07-13 21:26 ` Will Deacon
2025-07-01 16:45 ` [PATCH v2 5/8] vsock/virtio: Add vsock helper for linear SKB allocation Will Deacon
2025-07-02 16:40 ` Stefano Garzarella
2025-07-13 21:26 ` Will Deacon
2025-07-01 16:45 ` [PATCH v2 6/8] vhost/vsock: Allocate nonlinear SKBs for handling large receive buffers Will Deacon
2025-07-02 16:50 ` Stefano Garzarella
2025-07-13 21:37 ` Will Deacon
2025-07-01 16:45 ` [PATCH v2 7/8] vsock/virtio: Rename virtio_vsock_skb_rx_put() to virtio_vsock_skb_put() Will Deacon
2025-07-01 16:45 ` Will Deacon [this message]
2025-07-02 16:52 ` [PATCH v2 8/8] vsock/virtio: Allocate nonlinear SKBs for handling large transmit buffers Stefano Garzarella
2025-07-04 9:50 ` [PATCH v2 0/8] vsock/virtio: SKB allocation improvements Lei Yang
2025-07-13 20:18 ` Will Deacon
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20250701164507.14883-9-will@kernel.org \
--to=will@kernel.org \
--cc=eperezma@redhat.com \
--cc=fmayle@google.com \
--cc=jasowang@redhat.com \
--cc=keirf@google.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mst@redhat.com \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=sgarzare@redhat.com \
--cc=smoreland@google.com \
--cc=stefanha@redhat.com \
--cc=virtualization@lists.linux.dev \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.