All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jeremy Kerr <jk@codeconstruct.com.au>
To: Matt Johnston <matt@codeconstruct.com.au>,
	 "David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
	Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>,
	 Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>,
	Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com>,  Simon Horman <horms@kernel.org>
Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH net-next v5 09/14] net: mctp: test: Add initial socket tests
Date: Wed, 02 Jul 2025 14:20:09 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20250702-dev-forwarding-v5-9-1468191da8a4@codeconstruct.com.au> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250702-dev-forwarding-v5-0-1468191da8a4@codeconstruct.com.au>

Recent changes have modified the extaddr path a little, so add a couple
of kunit tests to af-mctp.c. These check that we're correctly passing
lladdr data between sendmsg/recvmsg and the routing layer.

Signed-off-by: Jeremy Kerr <jk@codeconstruct.com.au>
---
 net/mctp/route.c          |   5 ++
 net/mctp/test/sock-test.c | 213 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
 2 files changed, 218 insertions(+)

diff --git a/net/mctp/route.c b/net/mctp/route.c
index 23f339b4364316817b90b4fb2952c9eac445dd24..c49c35c989d89e1c199c8f60ace4d6584ea0d8c8 100644
--- a/net/mctp/route.c
+++ b/net/mctp/route.c
@@ -17,6 +17,8 @@
 #include <linux/rtnetlink.h>
 #include <linux/skbuff.h>
 
+#include <kunit/static_stub.h>
+
 #include <uapi/linux/if_arp.h>
 
 #include <net/mctp.h>
@@ -1011,6 +1013,9 @@ int mctp_local_output(struct sock *sk, struct mctp_dst *dst,
 	int rc;
 	u8 tag;
 
+	KUNIT_STATIC_STUB_REDIRECT(mctp_local_output, sk, dst, skb, daddr,
+				   req_tag);
+
 	rc = -ENODEV;
 
 	spin_lock_irqsave(&dst->dev->addrs_lock, flags);
diff --git a/net/mctp/test/sock-test.c b/net/mctp/test/sock-test.c
index abaad82b4e256bead6c0a6ab0698bfa4f75f8473..5501f7794a8f96f1dcf26e93542bec04ddcfc769 100644
--- a/net/mctp/test/sock-test.c
+++ b/net/mctp/test/sock-test.c
@@ -1,10 +1,223 @@
 // SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0
 
+#include <kunit/static_stub.h>
 #include <kunit/test.h>
 
+#include <linux/socket.h>
+#include <linux/spinlock.h>
+
 #include "utils.h"
 
+static const u8 dev_default_lladdr[] = { 0x01, 0x02 };
+
+/* helper for simple sock setup: single device, with dev_default_lladdr as its
+ * hardware address, assigned with a local EID 8, and a route to EID 9
+ */
+static void __mctp_sock_test_init(struct kunit *test,
+				  struct mctp_test_dev **devp,
+				  struct mctp_test_route **rtp,
+				  struct socket **sockp)
+{
+	struct mctp_test_route *rt;
+	struct mctp_test_dev *dev;
+	struct socket *sock;
+	unsigned long flags;
+	u8 *addrs;
+	int rc;
+
+	dev = mctp_test_create_dev_lladdr(sizeof(dev_default_lladdr),
+					  dev_default_lladdr);
+	KUNIT_ASSERT_NOT_ERR_OR_NULL(test, dev);
+
+	addrs = kmalloc(1, GFP_KERNEL);
+	KUNIT_ASSERT_NOT_ERR_OR_NULL(test, addrs);
+	addrs[0] = 8;
+
+	spin_lock_irqsave(&dev->mdev->addrs_lock, flags);
+	dev->mdev->num_addrs = 1;
+	swap(addrs, dev->mdev->addrs);
+	spin_unlock_irqrestore(&dev->mdev->addrs_lock, flags);
+
+	kfree(addrs);
+
+	rt = mctp_test_create_route(dev_net(dev->ndev), dev->mdev, 9, 0);
+	KUNIT_ASSERT_NOT_ERR_OR_NULL(test, rt);
+
+	rc = sock_create_kern(&init_net, AF_MCTP, SOCK_DGRAM, 0, &sock);
+	KUNIT_ASSERT_EQ(test, rc, 0);
+
+	*devp = dev;
+	*rtp = rt;
+	*sockp = sock;
+}
+
+static void __mctp_sock_test_fini(struct kunit *test,
+				  struct mctp_test_dev *dev,
+				  struct mctp_test_route *rt,
+				  struct socket *sock)
+{
+	sock_release(sock);
+	mctp_test_route_destroy(test, rt);
+	mctp_test_destroy_dev(dev);
+}
+
+struct mctp_test_sock_local_output_config {
+	struct mctp_test_dev *dev;
+	size_t halen;
+	u8 haddr[MAX_ADDR_LEN];
+	bool invoked;
+	int rc;
+};
+
+static int mctp_test_sock_local_output(struct sock *sk,
+				       struct mctp_dst *dst,
+				       struct sk_buff *skb,
+				       mctp_eid_t daddr, u8 req_tag)
+{
+	struct kunit *test = kunit_get_current_test();
+	struct mctp_test_sock_local_output_config *cfg = test->priv;
+
+	KUNIT_EXPECT_PTR_EQ(test, dst->dev, cfg->dev->mdev);
+	KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, dst->halen, cfg->halen);
+	KUNIT_EXPECT_MEMEQ(test, dst->haddr, cfg->haddr, dst->halen);
+
+	cfg->invoked = true;
+
+	kfree_skb(skb);
+
+	return cfg->rc;
+}
+
+static void mctp_test_sock_sendmsg_extaddr(struct kunit *test)
+{
+	struct sockaddr_mctp_ext addr = {
+		.smctp_base = {
+			.smctp_family = AF_MCTP,
+			.smctp_tag = MCTP_TAG_OWNER,
+			.smctp_network = MCTP_NET_ANY,
+		},
+	};
+	struct mctp_test_sock_local_output_config cfg = { 0 };
+	u8 haddr[] = { 0xaa, 0x01 };
+	u8 buf[4] = { 0, 1, 2, 3 };
+	struct mctp_test_route *rt;
+	struct msghdr msg = { 0 };
+	struct mctp_test_dev *dev;
+	struct mctp_sock *msk;
+	struct socket *sock;
+	ssize_t send_len;
+	struct kvec vec = {
+		.iov_base = buf,
+		.iov_len = sizeof(buf),
+	};
+
+	__mctp_sock_test_init(test, &dev, &rt, &sock);
+
+	/* Expect to see the dst configured up with the addressing data we
+	 * provide in the struct sockaddr_mctp_ext
+	 */
+	cfg.dev = dev;
+	cfg.halen = sizeof(haddr);
+	memcpy(cfg.haddr, haddr, sizeof(haddr));
+
+	test->priv = &cfg;
+
+	kunit_activate_static_stub(test, mctp_local_output,
+				   mctp_test_sock_local_output);
+
+	/* enable and configure direct addressing */
+	msk = container_of(sock->sk, struct mctp_sock, sk);
+	msk->addr_ext = true;
+
+	addr.smctp_ifindex = dev->ndev->ifindex;
+	addr.smctp_halen = sizeof(haddr);
+	memcpy(addr.smctp_haddr, haddr, sizeof(haddr));
+
+	msg.msg_name = &addr;
+	msg.msg_namelen = sizeof(addr);
+
+	iov_iter_kvec(&msg.msg_iter, ITER_SOURCE, &vec, 1, sizeof(buf));
+	send_len = mctp_sendmsg(sock, &msg, sizeof(buf));
+	KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, send_len, sizeof(buf));
+	KUNIT_EXPECT_TRUE(test, cfg.invoked);
+
+	__mctp_sock_test_fini(test, dev, rt, sock);
+}
+
+static void mctp_test_sock_recvmsg_extaddr(struct kunit *test)
+{
+	struct sockaddr_mctp_ext recv_addr = { 0 };
+	u8 rcv_buf[1], rcv_data[] = { 0, 1 };
+	u8 haddr[] = { 0xaa, 0x02 };
+	struct mctp_test_route *rt;
+	struct mctp_test_dev *dev;
+	struct mctp_skb_cb *cb;
+	struct mctp_sock *msk;
+	struct sk_buff *skb;
+	struct mctp_hdr hdr;
+	struct socket *sock;
+	struct msghdr msg;
+	ssize_t recv_len;
+	int rc;
+	struct kvec vec = {
+		.iov_base = rcv_buf,
+		.iov_len = sizeof(rcv_buf),
+	};
+
+	__mctp_sock_test_init(test, &dev, &rt, &sock);
+
+	/* enable extended addressing on recv */
+	msk = container_of(sock->sk, struct mctp_sock, sk);
+	msk->addr_ext = true;
+
+	/* base incoming header, using a nul-EID dest */
+	hdr.ver = 1;
+	hdr.dest = 0;
+	hdr.src = 9;
+	hdr.flags_seq_tag = MCTP_HDR_FLAG_SOM | MCTP_HDR_FLAG_EOM |
+			    MCTP_HDR_FLAG_TO;
+
+	skb = mctp_test_create_skb_data(&hdr, &rcv_data);
+	KUNIT_ASSERT_NOT_ERR_OR_NULL(test, skb);
+
+	mctp_test_skb_set_dev(skb, dev);
+
+	/* set incoming extended address data */
+	cb = mctp_cb(skb);
+	cb->halen = sizeof(haddr);
+	cb->ifindex = dev->ndev->ifindex;
+	memcpy(cb->haddr, haddr, sizeof(haddr));
+
+	/* Deliver to socket. The route input path pulls the network header,
+	 * leaving skb data at type byte onwards. recvmsg will consume the
+	 * type for addr.smctp_type
+	 */
+	skb_pull(skb, sizeof(hdr));
+	rc = sock_queue_rcv_skb(sock->sk, skb);
+	KUNIT_ASSERT_EQ(test, rc, 0);
+
+	msg.msg_name = &recv_addr;
+	msg.msg_namelen = sizeof(recv_addr);
+	iov_iter_kvec(&msg.msg_iter, ITER_DEST, &vec, 1, sizeof(rcv_buf));
+
+	recv_len = mctp_recvmsg(sock, &msg, sizeof(rcv_buf),
+				MSG_DONTWAIT | MSG_TRUNC);
+
+	KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, recv_len, sizeof(rcv_buf));
+
+	/* expect our extended address to be populated from hdr and cb */
+	KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, msg.msg_namelen, sizeof(recv_addr));
+	KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, recv_addr.smctp_base.smctp_family, AF_MCTP);
+	KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, recv_addr.smctp_ifindex, dev->ndev->ifindex);
+	KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, recv_addr.smctp_halen, sizeof(haddr));
+	KUNIT_EXPECT_MEMEQ(test, recv_addr.smctp_haddr, haddr, sizeof(haddr));
+
+	__mctp_sock_test_fini(test, dev, rt, sock);
+}
+
 static struct kunit_case mctp_test_cases[] = {
+	KUNIT_CASE(mctp_test_sock_sendmsg_extaddr),
+	KUNIT_CASE(mctp_test_sock_recvmsg_extaddr),
 	{}
 };
 

-- 
2.39.5


  parent reply	other threads:[~2025-07-02  6:20 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2025-07-02  6:20 [PATCH net-next v5 00/14] net: mctp: Add support for gateway routing Jeremy Kerr
2025-07-02  6:20 ` [PATCH net-next v5 01/14] net: mctp: don't use source cb data when forwarding, ensure pkt_type is set Jeremy Kerr
2025-07-02  6:20 ` [PATCH net-next v5 02/14] net: mctp: test: make cloned_frag buffers more appropriately-sized Jeremy Kerr
2025-07-02  6:20 ` [PATCH net-next v5 03/14] net: mctp: separate routing database from routing operations Jeremy Kerr
2025-07-02  6:20 ` [PATCH net-next v5 04/14] net: mctp: separate cb from direct-addressing routing Jeremy Kerr
2025-07-02  6:20 ` [PATCH net-next v5 05/14] net: mctp: test: Add an addressed device constructor Jeremy Kerr
2025-07-02  6:20 ` [PATCH net-next v5 06/14] net: mctp: test: Add extaddr routing output test Jeremy Kerr
2025-07-02  6:20 ` [PATCH net-next v5 07/14] net: mctp: test: move functions into utils.[ch] Jeremy Kerr
2025-07-02  6:20 ` [PATCH net-next v5 08/14] net: mctp: test: add sock test infrastructure Jeremy Kerr
2025-07-02  6:20 ` Jeremy Kerr [this message]
2025-07-02  6:20 ` [PATCH net-next v5 10/14] net: mctp: pass net into route creation Jeremy Kerr
2025-07-02  6:20 ` [PATCH net-next v5 11/14] net: mctp: remove routes by netid, not by device Jeremy Kerr
2025-07-02  6:20 ` [PATCH net-next v5 12/14] net: mctp: allow NL parsing directly into a struct mctp_route Jeremy Kerr
2025-07-02  6:20 ` [PATCH net-next v5 13/14] net: mctp: add gateway routing support Jeremy Kerr
2025-07-02  6:20 ` [PATCH net-next v5 14/14] net: mctp: test: Add tests for gateway routes Jeremy Kerr
2025-07-08 11:00 ` [PATCH net-next v5 00/14] net: mctp: Add support for gateway routing patchwork-bot+netdevbpf

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20250702-dev-forwarding-v5-9-1468191da8a4@codeconstruct.com.au \
    --to=jk@codeconstruct.com.au \
    --cc=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=edumazet@google.com \
    --cc=horms@kernel.org \
    --cc=kuba@kernel.org \
    --cc=matt@codeconstruct.com.au \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.