From: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>
To: Gabriel Goller <g.goller@proxmox.com>,
Nicolas Dichtel <nicolas.dichtel@6wind.com>
Cc: "David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>,
Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com>, Simon Horman <horms@kernel.org>,
Jonathan Corbet <corbet@lwn.net>,
David Ahern <dsahern@kernel.org>,
netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-doc@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3] ipv6: add `force_forwarding` sysctl to enable per-interface forwarding
Date: Wed, 2 Jul 2025 07:34:58 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20250702073458.3294b431@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250702074619.139031-1-g.goller@proxmox.com>
On Wed, 2 Jul 2025 09:46:18 +0200 Gabriel Goller wrote:
> It is currently impossible to enable ipv6 forwarding on a per-interface
> basis like in ipv4. To enable forwarding on an ipv6 interface we need to
> enable it on all interfaces and disable it on the other interfaces using
> a netfilter rule. This is especially cumbersome if you have lots of
> interface and only want to enable forwarding on a few. According to the
> sysctl docs [0] the `net.ipv6.conf.all.forwarding` enables forwarding
> for all interfaces, while the interface-specific
> `net.ipv6.conf.<interface>.forwarding` configures the interface
> Host/Router configuration.
>
> Introduce a new sysctl flag `force_forwarding`, which can be set on every
> interface. The ip6_forwarding function will then check if the global
> forwarding flag OR the force_forwarding flag is active and forward the
> packet.
Should we invert the polarity? It appears that the condition below only
let's this setting _disable_ forwarding. IMO calling it "force" suggests
to the user that it will force it to be enabled.
Nicolas, how do you feel about asking for a selftest here?
The functionality is fairly trivial from datapath PoV, but feels odd
to merge uAPI these days without a selftest..
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-07-02 14:35 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-07-02 7:46 [PATCH v3] ipv6: add `force_forwarding` sysctl to enable per-interface forwarding Gabriel Goller
2025-07-02 10:05 ` Nicolas Dichtel
2025-07-02 22:26 ` Randy Dunlap
2025-07-03 6:58 ` Nicolas Dichtel
2025-07-04 4:09 ` Randy Dunlap
2025-07-03 11:04 ` Gabriel Goller
2025-07-03 14:04 ` Nicolas Dichtel
2025-07-03 14:50 ` Gabriel Goller
2025-07-02 14:34 ` Jakub Kicinski [this message]
2025-07-02 15:14 ` Nicolas Dichtel
2025-07-02 16:10 ` Jakub Kicinski
2025-07-02 16:17 ` Nicolas Dichtel
2025-07-03 11:05 ` Gabriel Goller
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20250702073458.3294b431@kernel.org \
--to=kuba@kernel.org \
--cc=corbet@lwn.net \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=dsahern@kernel.org \
--cc=edumazet@google.com \
--cc=g.goller@proxmox.com \
--cc=horms@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-doc@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=nicolas.dichtel@6wind.com \
--cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.